Survival is linked to the histopathologic distinction between usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP), the most commonly encountered fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. We retrospectively compared the prognostic significance of histopathologic diagnoses, baseline pulmonary function indices, and serial trends in pulmonary function indices (diffusing capacity, FVC, FEV1, the recently defined composite physiologic index) at 6 and 12 months in 104 patients (UIP, n = 63; fibrotic NSIP, n = 41). Survival was lower in UIP than in fibrotic NSIP (p = 0.001) but not in patients with severe functional impairment; mortality during the first 2 years was linked solely to the severity of functional impairment at presentation. The composite physiologic index was the strongest determinant of outcome (p < 0.001). At 6 months, serial diffusing capacity levels (p = 0.003) and histopathologic diagnosis (p = 0.002) were prognostically equivalent. At 12 months, serial pulmonary function trends were the only major prognostic determinant (p < 0.0005 for all variables), with no independent significance associated with the distinction between UIP and fibrotic NSIP. We conclude that at 12 months, serial pulmonary function trends have considerable prognostic value in UIP and NSIP. Their histologic distinction provides no additional prognostic information when pulmonary function trends are clear cut or when functional impairment is severe.
The recently published American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society classification for idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) (1, 2) now provides clinicians with an invaluable framework with which to estimate prognosis and the likely impact of treatment. The application of this system, based on either thoracoscopic biopsy or agreed noninvasive diagnostic criteria, is particularly useful when the diagnosis discloses an expected good outcome (e.g., inflammatory disorders such as respiratory bronchiolitis with associated interstitial lung disease and cellular nonspecific interstitial pneumonia [NSIP]). Prognostication is less certain in the two categories of IIP in which fibrosis predominates, hereafter termed fibrotic IIP (usual interstitial pneumonia [UIP] and fibrotic NSIP). The more indolent examples of fibrotic NSIP—associated with connective tissue disease (3, 4) or with clinical and radiologic features of organizing pneumonia (5, 6) or hypersensitivity pneumonitis (7)—are usually readily identifiable at initial evaluation and are not included here among the fibrotic IIPs. However, an important subgroup of fibrotic NSIP patients present with clinical features indistinguishable from those showing UIP and having idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Although analyses of the fibrotic NSIP group consistently show a better survival than in UIP (8–11), there is considerable individual overlap in outcome, with many fibrotic NSIP patients having a UIP-like outcome (9–11). Thus, it has been argued that when a histopathologic diagnosis of NSIP has been made, the work of the clinician has only just begun (12).
In practice, clinicians generally refine prognostic impressions (and sometimes revisit histologic diagnoses) in individual cases according to longitudinal behavior. Pulmonary function evaluation at presentation is disappointingly imprecise, prognostically (13, 14); however, the prognostic value of pulmonary function trends over time may prove more useful. We have therefore retrospectively compared the prognostic value of the histopathologic diagnosis, baseline functional impairment, and observed pulmonary function trends at 6 and 12 months in the combined group of patients presenting with features of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and a biopsy diagnosis of UIP or NSIP. Some of this work has been presented previously in the form of American Thoracic Society abstracts (15, 16).
Between January 1, 1978, and December 31, 1998, 104 patients met clinical and open-lung or thoracoscopic biopsy criteria for fibrotic IIP and make up the study population. These comprise all biopsied patients included in our files as cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis, a term considered equivalent to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A further six patients with cellular NSIP were excluded. Part of the cohort has been reported previously in studies of outcome against histopathologic diagnosis in IIP (10, 11). In patients presenting before 1987 (n = 42), clinical criteria comprised the following: (1) bilateral predominantly basal crackles, (2) evidence of predominantly basal bilateral lung fibrosis on chest radiography with no consolidation, (3) a restrictive functional defect (total lung capacity of less than 80% of predicted, in association with a restrictive FEV1/FVC ratio) or isolated reduction in diffusing capacity (DlCO), and (4) no known primary cause for pulmonary fibrosis (17). After 1987 (n = 64), computed tomography criteria were used (predominantly basal/subpleural distribution; a mixture of reticular and ground-glass abnormalities, with traction bronchiectasis when ground-glass attenuation was prominent; the absence of consolidation or nodules) (18) in addition to clinical criteria.
Slides were reviewed by two pulmonary histopathologists (A.G.N. and T.V.C.) who were without knowledge of clinical data, and they were classified according to consensus criteria (2, 19). When classification differed between pathologists (κ coefficient of agreement = 0.46), a joint opinion on the overall histopathologic pattern was reached. When biopsies were taken from two sites (n = 58, 56%), both were interpreted; a pattern of UIP in one biopsy was taken to indicate an overall diagnosis of UIP.
Clinical data (smoking status, drug treatment, clinical findings, absence of previous environmental exposures, and connective tissue disease) were extracted from case records. Patients were categorized as nonsmokers, current smokers, or ex-smokers (a minimum of one cigarette a day for a minimum of 1 year, stopping at least 6 months before presentation). In all but two cases, both with mild disease, patients were treated during follow-up. The treatment regimen consisted of (1) high-dose prednisolone initially (40–60 mg daily), reducing to a maintenance average daily dose of 10 mg, or (2) prednisolone 10 mg daily in combination with azathioprine or cyclophosphamide. Changes were made during follow-up (introduction of or changes in immunosuppressive agents) as clinically warranted; for this reason and because efficacy differs little between these regimens (20, 21), treatment effects were not evaluated.
Analyzed lung function measurements consisted of FVC, FEV1 (both measured using an Ohio water-seal spirometer; Ohio instruments, Atlanta, GA), and carbon monoxide DlCO using a single breath technique or a rebreathing technique with adjustment to single breath values (P.K Morgan respirometer; P.K Morgan, Chatham, Kent, UK). Results were expressed as percentages of predicted values (22). The recently defined composite physiologic index (CPI) (23), derived from FEV1, FVC, and DlCO levels (CPI = 91.0 – [0.65 × percent predicted DlCO] − [0.53 × percent predicted FVC] + [0.34 − percent predicted FEV1]), which corrects for the confounding effects of concurrent emphysema, was also evaluated. Measurement of earlobe capillary gases was performed on air at rest. Serial trends in pulmonary function tests (DlCO, FVC, FEV1, all quantified as percentage change from baseline, and unadjusted changes in CPI scores) were defined in survivors at 6 months (4–8 months, n = 85) and at 1 year (9–15 months, n = 72). Trends in earlobe capillary gases (not repeated in a significant minority) were not evaluated.
Group comparisons were made using unpaired t tests, Wilcoxon's rank sum tests, or chi-squared statistics as appropriate. Survival was evaluated using proportional hazards regression (24) (STATA software; Computing Resource Center, Santa Monica, CA). The prognostic values of clinical indices, histopathologic diagnosis, functional indices at baseline, and serial functional trends were examined at presentation and after 6 and 12 months of follow-up.
Of 104 patients who had a prior clinicopathologic diagnosis of cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis (roughly equivalent to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis), 61 (59%) were reclassified as UIP and 43 (41%) as NSIP. As shown in Table 1
UIP (n = 61) | NSIP (n = 43) | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 55.4 ± 7.5 | 55.4 ± 7.5 |
| Male/female | 52/9 | 32/11 |
| Current smokers | 15 (25%) | 12 (28%) |
| Ex-smokers | 33 (54%) | 17 (40%) |
| Nonsmokers | 13 (21%) | 14 (33%) |
| Duration dyspnea, month* | 16 (0–120) | 14 (0–181) |
| CPI, unadjusted units | 48.1 ± 12.3 | 49.9 ± 14.7 |
| FEV1, % predicted | 75.1 ± 14.4 | 72.9 ± 19.5 |
| FVC, % predicted | 72.0 ± 17.9 | 73.1 ± 23.2 |
| DLCO, % predicted | 46.6 ± 14.0 | 41.9 ± 15.0 |
| PO2, kPa | 9.9 ± 1.6 | 9.8 ± 1.8 |
| Clubbing† | 36/53 (68%) | 22/42 (52%) |
| Treatment‡: prednisolone | 25 (41%) | 18 (42%) |
| Treatment‡: combination | 35 (57%) | 24 (56%) |
| No treatment | 1 (2%) | 1 (2%) |
In 95 cases, follow-up was complete to death or, in survivors, until February 28, 2001, and was censored in nine patients. There were 73 deaths during a median follow-up of 32 months (UIP 48 of 61, 79%; NSIP 25 of 43, 58%). As shown in Figure 1

Figure 1. Survival compared between patients with usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP, n = 61) and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP, n = 43). Early mortality was associated solely with the severity of lung function impairment at presentation, but mortality after 2 years of follow-up was primarily linked to the histopathologic diagnosis.
[More] [Minimize]Combined Population (n = 104) | UIP (n = 61) | NSIP (n = 43) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CPI | 1.03 (1.01, 1.05) | 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) | 1.03 (1.00, 1.07) |
| p < 0.001 | p < 0.0005 | p = 0.06 | |
| DLCO, % predicted | 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) | 0.97 (0.95, 0.99) | 0.97 (0.95, 1.00) |
| p = 0.02 | p = 0.02 | p = 0.09 | |
| FVC, % predicted | 0.98 (0.97, 0.99) | 0.9 (0.96, 0.99) | 0.98 (0.96, 1.00) |
| p = 0.002 | p < 0.005 | p = 0.05 | |
| FEV1, % predicted | 0.98 (0.97, 1.00) | NS | 0.97 (0.95, 1.00) |
| p = 0.02 | p = 0.03 | ||
| PO2, kPa | 0.86 (0.73, 1.00) | NS | NS |
| P = 0.06 |
Mortality did not differ significantly between NSIP and UIP during the first 2 years (p = 0.41) but was significantly higher in UIP at 3 years of follow-up (p < 0.05) and subsequently (Figure 1). Therefore, mortality was subclassified as early (deaths during the 3 years after presentation in the whole population; UIP, n = 20; NSIP, n = 11) and late (subsequent deaths, in 65 patients surviving more than two years; UIP, n = 28; NSIP, n =14). Clinical variables at presentation in relationship to the timing of mortality are shown in Table 3
Early Deaths (n = 31) | Late Deaths (n = 31) | Statistical Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 53.9 ± 10.4 | 56.3 ± 6.4 | NS |
| Male/female | 23:8 | 38:4 | p = 0.06 |
| Duration dyspnea, month* | 24 (2–120) | 9.5 (0–65) | p = 0.001 |
| CPI, unadjusted units | 55.3 ± 13.4 | 46.7 ± 7.8 | P < 0.001 |
| FEV1, % predicted | 67.2 ± 16.6 | 79.8 ± 12.1 | p < 0.0005 |
| FVC, % predicted | 62.0 ± 20.0 | 78.7 ± 14.3 | p < 0.0001 |
| DLCO, % predicted | 39.4 ± 14.5 | 45.8 ± 11.3 | p = 0.04 |
| PO2, kPa | 8.8 ± 1.8 | 10.4 ± 1.4 | p < 0.0005 |
Early Mortality | Late Mortality | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | p Value | HR (95% CI) | p Value | |||
| NSIP vs. UIP, controlling for the CPI score | — | 0.23 | 0.26 (0.12, 0.54) | < 0.0005 | ||
| CPI, unadjusted units | 1.06 (1.03, 1.09) | < 0.0005 | 1.03 (1.01, 1.06) | p = 0.02 | ||
| NSIP vs. UIP, controlling for % predicted FVC | — | = 0.39 | 0.32 (0.16, 0.64) | < 0.001 | ||
| FVC, % predicted | 0.96 (0.94, 0.98) | < 0.0005 | — | = 0.22 | ||
| NSIP vs. UIP, controlling for % predicted DLCO | — | = 0.19 | 0.28 (0.14, 0.57) | < 0.0005 | ||
| DLCO, % predicted | 0.96 (0.94, 0.99) | < 0.005 | 0.98 (0.95, 1.00) | p = 0.05 | ||
Outcome was re-evaluated in 28 patients (UIP, n = 12; NSIP, n = 16) with DlCO levels less than 35% predicted (the level at which patients are considered for lung transplantation at our institution). This subgroup was characterized by a worse 3-year survival than in the remaining patients (p = 0.03). As shown in Figure 2

Figure 2. Three-year survival in relationship to the level of gas transfer at presentation. Survival was better in patients with diffusing capacity (DLCO) of more than 35% predicted (n = 76) than in those with DLCO of less than 35% predicted (n = 28, shown as separate UIP and NSIP subgroups) (p = 0.03). In the latter group, survival did not differ between UIP and NSIP (p = 0.28).
[More] [Minimize]At 6 months, 85 of the 94 known survivors remained under review and underwent repeat pulmonary function tests (UIP, n = 49; NSIP, n = 36). Survival (from the date of repeat pulmonary function testing) was examined in relationship to age, sex, histopathologic diagnosis, the CPI, and pulmonary function trends over the preceding 6 months (with trends in each functional variable examined in a separate model). The histopathologic diagnosis (p < 0.005 in all models) and pulmonary function trends (DlCO, p < 0.005; CPI, p = 0.02; FVC, p = 0.02; FEV1, p = 0.04) were the only independent determinants of survival. When examined in separate models, functional variables measured at 6 months (CPI, DlCO, FVC, FEV1) had no independent prognostic value, after adjustment for changes in DlCO in the preceding 6 months and the histopathologic diagnosis.
Pulmonary function trends in all variables were examined jointly in a further proportional hazards model, with the histopathologic diagnosis also included as a covariate. Trends in DlCO levels (p = 0.003) and the histopathologic diagnosis (p = 0.002) were independent determinants of mortality, with no independent prognostic information obtained from trends in other functional indices. When the analysis was repeated with the exclusion of DlCO data, trends in the CPI (p = 0.02) and the histopathologic diagnosis (p = 0.002) were the sole independent determinants of mortality (p < 0.0005).
At 12 months, 72 of the 82 known survivors remained under review and underwent repeat pulmonary function tests (UIP, n = 41; NSIP, n = 31). Survival (from the date of repeat pulmonary function testing) was examined in relationship to age, sex, histopathologic diagnosis, the CPI, and pulmonary function trends over the preceding 12 months (with trends in each functional variable examined in a separate model). Pulmonary function trends predicted mortality much more strongly than other covariates (change in DlCO, CPI, FVC, FEV1, all p < 0.0005). Age, sex, and the histopathologic diagnosis had no independent prognostic value in any analysis. As shown in Figure 3

Figure 3. Survival in 72 patients remaining under follow-up at 12 months in relationship to serial 12-month changes in total gas transfer (DLCO). Mortality was substantially higher in those with a significant (more than 15%) deterioration in gas transfer (p < 0.0005) but did not differ between UIP and NSIP, after DLCO trends had been taken into account.
[More] [Minimize]Pulmonary function trends were examined jointly in a further proportional hazards model. Trends in DlCO levels were the cardinal determinant of mortality (p < 0.0005), with no independent prognostic information obtained from trends in other functional indices. When analysis was repeated with the exclusion of DlCO data, changes in the CPI were the sole independent determinant of mortality (p < 0.0005).
In fibrotic IIP, the histopathologic distinction between UIP and fibrotic NSIP provides useful prognostic information (8–11). However, the considerable overlap in longitudinal behavior between these two entities poses considerable difficulties in prognostic evaluation. We compare, for the first time, the prognostic values of short-term serial pulmonary function trends and the histopathologic diagnosis. After 6 months of follow-up, changes in functional indices (especially changes in gas transfer levels) were as powerful a determinant of outcome as the original histopathologic diagnosis. After 12 months of follow-up, the distinction between UIP and fibrotic NSIP provided no additional prognostic information, once serial pulmonary function trends had been taken into account. Thus, our findings confirm the anecdotal impression of many clinicians that in the difficult clinical problem of fibrotic IIP, longitudinal behavior is a more accurate determinant of outcome than evaluation at a single point in time. Changes in gas transfer levels provided the most accurate indication of survival, with no additional information gained by evaluating changes in other pulmonary function indices. However, changes in other indices at 1 year, including the recently described CPI (23), were also substantially more predictive of outcome than the histopathologic diagnosis.
A further novel aspect of this study was the separation of outcome into early and late mortality, not attempted formally in previous comparisons between UIP and NSIP. The fact that mortality in the first 2 years was primarily linked to the severity of pulmonary function impairment and not to the histopathologic diagnosis has important clinical implications for the initial management of fibrotic IIP. The role of thoracoscopic biopsy needs to be considered critically in the context of functionally severe disease, in which fibrosis appears to be established. In a minority of patients (approximately 25% in the present cohort) with DlCO levels less than 35% of predicted normally, biopsy evaluation provided no prognostically useful information. This cutoff was selected for two reasons. This level of functional impairment should stimulate consideration of transplantation (25) (in view of the need to avoid a delay in pretransplant investigations in inexorably progressive disease and the predicament of referring for transplantation too late). However, importantly, the risks of thoracoscopic biopsy may rise significantly as gas transfer levels approach 30% of predicted normal (26). The lack of a histopathologic diagnosis in this situation is stressful for clinicians. However, these data indicate that a UIP-like course is usual in this context, even when a diagnosis of fibrotic NSIP has been secured.
This observation is likely to explain a striking dichotomy in the determinants of early and late mortality in our cohort. During the first two years of follow-up, the level of functional impairment was the sole major determinant of survival in the combined cohort, and this can be ascribed to the strong link between early death and severe functional impairment, in UIP and fibrotic NSIP alike. In contrast, in individuals with less severe functional impairment, the longitudinal behavior of fibrotic NSIP appears to be truly heterogeneous, whereas UIP continues to progress in almost all cases: Thus, the histopathologic diagnosis was the cardinal determinant of late mortality. A decline in serial lung function indices at 1 year was much more prevalent in UIP than in NSIP, although a minority of NSIP cases with the longitudinal functional behavior of UIP at 1 year appear to have a UIP-like outcome.
From the overall survival profile in this study and the contrasts in longitudinal behavior within the NSIP cohort, it can thus be concluded that there are two important groups of patients associated with a histopathologic diagnosis of fibrotic NSIP. A large subset, identifiable by their functional severity at presentation or a decline in functional indices at 6 to 12 months despite treatment can be regarded, for practical therapeutic purposes, as equivalent to UIP. In contrast, a long-term survival of 40% in the fibrotic NSIP cohort is indicative of a separate important subset with a much better outcome.
Flaherty and colleagues have argued that the histopathologic distinction between UIP and (at least some cases of) fibrotic NSIP is flawed because of heterogeneity between and even within biopsied lobes in histopathologic classification (27). They showed that in patients with multiple biopsies, not all lobes showed the same histology: Those with UIP in one biopsy and NSIP in another were termed discordant UIP (approximately 25% of patients). The remaining 75% were either concordant UIP (approximately 50%) or concordant NSIP (approximately 25%). The authors suggested that some cases of NSIP may “evolve” to UIP, a hypothesis that has not been proven but might provide some support for the recent concept of “active” and “inactive” UIP (12). The observations of Flaherty and colleagues might also support our concept that there may be subgroups among patients with fibrotic NSIP, some of whom fare better than others. It appears clear that a separate entity of “true” fibrotic NSIP among the IIPs exists, with no evolution to UIP, judging from outcome findings in a subset of patients in this study. Thus, our findings highlight the importance of distinguishing between an NSIP/UIP overlap picture and true NSIP, a distinction probably best made using serial lung function trends.
The finding that serial trends in gas transfer were the most accurate determinants of outcome should be interpreted with caution. Serial trends in FVC were little inferior in this regard and may be more reliable than gas transfer trends in lung function laboratories without high exposure to interstitial lung disease, in view of the well recognized variability in gas transfer measurements (28). Serial trends in the recently defined CPI (23) did not add usefully to DlCO trends, although providing similarly strong prognostic information. This finding is not surprising; the value of the CPI lies in correcting for the confounding effects of emphysema, which is likely to be less prevalent in a younger population undergoing lung biopsy. Moreover, the value of an index at a single point in time does not always equate with its role in longitudinal monitoring. It is likely that the functional effects of emphysema change relatively little in 12 months; thus, changes in DlCO and FVC may be little affected by concurrent emphysema, despite major confounding by emphysema of measured values at presentation.
It should be stressed that our findings do not justify a policy of nonbiopsy at presentation in fibrotic IIP. First, our analysis presupposes that other histopathologic entities have been excluded, including inflammatory IIPs and hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and this conclusion cannot always be made confidently using noninvasive modalities. More importantly, the prognostic value of longitudinal functional behavior has been established in a treated cohort.
It appears possible, although unproven, that treatment is crucial in some patients with fibrotic NSIP, even if current regimens may be of limited value in UIP. In this cohort, the duration of dyspnea and levels of functional impairment were virtually identical at presentation in UIP and fibrotic NSIP, implying little difference in the rate of disease progression before presentation. Thus, it is possible that the good outcome in some NSIP patients in our cohort resulted from therapeutic intervention. If treatment is to be rationalized at presentation, immediate biopsy evaluation remains useful; however, our findings do suggest that biopsy is most useful when performed immediately, rather than when instigated following the observation of longitudinal behavior. It is also likely that biopsy evaluation will itself be refined, with additional prognostic information gleaned from the profusion of fibroblastic foci (29, 30) and clinical information (31) in proven UIP. Furthermore, lung function trends are especially useful when they show unequivocal change (decline or clear-cut stability). However, a large subset of patients exhibits marginal deterioration, which may represent either true decline or the “noise” of measurement. Thus, despite its cardinal prognostic role in the whole cohort in this study, longitudinal behavior over 1 year is not an infallible guide to outcome in every case.
In common with all histopathologic studies, the problem of selection bias needs to be considered. In the first half of the study period, a prospective policy was in place to biopsy all patients with suspected idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. The group of patients with the most severe disease were necessarily excluded, but our findings indicate that in patients with more severe disease undergoing biopsy, the prognostic distinction between UIP and fibrotic NSIP adds little. Furthermore, in common with all biopsied cohorts from referral centers, the mean patient age was considerably lower than in populations drawn from secondary centers or the community. More important, in the last decade, computed tomography has been an increasingly important influence on the selection of cases to biopsy. In common with others (32, 33), we have tended to place most reliance on a computed tomography picture of predominantly peripheral subpleural honeycombing, as strongly indicative of underlying UIP, often obviating biopsy. Thus, there is undoubtedly some bias in the latter half of our cohort toward a biopsy diagnosis of fibrotic NSIP. However, in all of these regards, our patients may be typical of those in whom biopsy is generally performed, in the computed tomography era.
In conclusion, we have documented the considerable prognostic value in fibrotic IIP of serial pulmonary function trends at 6 and 12 months in a treated cohort. Longitudinal behavior is an invaluable prognostic supplement to lung biopsy at presentation. In treated patients, observed pulmonary function trends at 12 months may obviate biopsy in some cases. Our findings also disclose the marginal prognostic value of biopsy evaluation in functionally severe fibrotic IIP, underlining the potential importance of early biopsy evaluation in these difficult diseases.
| 1. | American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: diagnosis and treatment: International Consensus Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;161:646–664. |
| 2. | American Thoracic Society, European Respiratory Society. American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society international multidisciplinary consensus classification of the idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:277–304. |
| 3. | Bouros D, Wells AU, Nicholson AG, Colby TV, Polychronopoulos P, Pantelidis P, Haslam PL, Vassilakis DA, Black CM, du Bois RM. Histopathologic subsets of fibrosing alveolitis in patients with systemic sclerosis and their relationship to outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1581–1586. |
| 4. | Douglas WW, Tazelaar HD, Hartman TE, Hartman RP, Decker PA, Schroeder DR, Ryu JH. Polymyositis-dermatomyositis-associated interstitial lung disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1182–1185. |
| 5. | Nagai S, Kitaichi M, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Izumi T, Colby TV. Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia/fibrosis: comparison with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and BOOP. Eur Respir J 1998;12:1010–1019. |
| 6. | Park JS, Lee KS, Kim JS, Park CS, Suh YL, Choi DL, Kim KJ. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia with fibrosis: radiographic and CT findings in seven patients. Radiology 1995;195:645–648. |
| 7. | Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Hansell DM, Colby TV, Myers JL, Tazelaar HD, Nicholson AG, Wells AU, Ryu JH, et al. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: variable appearance at high resolution chest CT. Radiology 2000;217:701–705. |
| 8. | Bjoraker JA, Ryu JH, Edwin MK, Myers JL, Tazelaar HD, Schroeder DR, Offord KP. Prognostic significance of histopathological subsets in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:199–203. |
| 9. | Travis WD, Matsui K, Moss J, Ferrans VJ. Idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: prognostic significance of cellular and fibrosing patterns: survival comparison with usual interstitial pneumonia and desquamative interstitial pneumonia. Am J Surg Pathol 2000;24:19–33. |
| 10. | Daniil ZD, Gilchrist FC, Nicholson AG, Hansell DM, Harris J, Colby TV, du Bois RM. A histologic pattern of nonspecific interstitial pneumonia is associated with a better prognosis than usual interstitial pneumonia in patients with cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1999;160:899–905. |
| 11. | Nicholson AG, Colby TV, du Bois RM, Hansell DM, Wells AU. The prognostic significance of the histologic pattern of interstitial pneumonia in patients presenting with the clinical entity of cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2000;162:2213–2217. |
| 12. | Nicholson AG, Wells AU. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: nobody said it's perfect. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1553–1554. |
| 13. | Schwartz DA, Helmers RA, Galvin JR, Van Fossen DS, Frees KL, Dayton CS, Burmeister LF, Hunninghake GW. Determinants of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:450–454. |
| 14. | Gay SE, Kazerooni EA, Toews GB, Lynch JP III, Gross BH, Cascade PN, Spizarny DL, Flint A, Schork MA, Whyte RI, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: predicting response to therapy and survival. Am J Respir Crit Care Med; 157:1063–1072. |
| 15. | Latsi PI, Wells AU, Veeraraghavan S, Bisirtzoglou D, Vassilakis DA, Nikolakopoulou A, du Bois RM. Idiopathic UIP and NSIP: changes in lung function at one year [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:A135. |
| 16. | Latsi PI, Wells AU, Veeraraghavan S, Bisirtzoglou D, Vassilakis DA, Nikolakopoulou A, du Bois RM. Predictors of survival in idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:A136. |
| 17. | Wells AU, King AD, Rubens MB, Cramer D, du Bois RM, Hansell DM. Lone cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis: a functional-morphologic correlation based on extent of disease on thin section computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997;155:1367–1375. |
| 18. | MacDonald SL, Rubens MB, Hansell DM, Copley SJ, Desai SR, du Bois RM, Nicholson AG, Colby TV, Wells AU. Nonspecific interstitial pneumonia and usual interstitial pneumonia: comparative appearances and diagnostic accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography. Radiology 2001;221:600–605. |
| 19. | Katzenstein ALA, Myers JL. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: clinical relevance of pathologic classification. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;157:1301–1315. |
| 20. | Johnson MA, Kwan S, Snell NJ, Nunn AJ, Darbyshire JH, Turner-Warwick M. Randomised controlled trial comparing prednisolone alone with cyclophosphamide and low dose prednisolone in combination in cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. Thorax 1989;44:280–288. |
| 21. | Raghu G, Depaso WJ, Cain K, Hammar SP, Wetzel CE, Dreis DF, Hutchinson J, Pardee NP, Winterbauer RH. Azathioprine combined with prednisone in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a prospective double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Am Rev Respir Dis 1991;144:291–296. |
| 22. | Quanjer PH. Standardised lung function testing. Clin Respir Physiol 1983;19:1–95. |
| 23. | Wells AU, Desai SR, Rubens MB, Goh NSL, Cramer D, Nicholson AG, Colby TV, du Bois RM, Hansell DM. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a composite physiologic index derived from disease extent observed by computed tomography. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2003;167:962–969. |
| 24. | Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller R. Applied regression analysis and other multivariate methods. Boston: Kent; 1988. |
| 25. | Mogulkoc N, Brutsche MH, Bishop PW, Greaves SM, Horrocks AW, Egan JJ. Pulmonary function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and referral for lung transplantation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:103–108. |
| 26. | Utz JP, Ryu JH, Douglas WW, Tazelaar HD, Myers JL, Allen MS, Schroeder DR. Hugh short-term mortality following lung biopsy for usual interstitial pneumonia. Eur Respir J 2001;17:175–179. |
| 27. | Flaherty KR, Travis WD, Colby TV, Toews GB, Kazerooni EA, Gross BH, Jain A, Strawderman RL, Flint A, Lynch JP, et al. Histopathologic variability in usual and nonspecific interstitial pneumonias. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1722–1727. |
| 28. | Snow M, Stein C, Fallat R. Interlaboratory variability of pulmonary function tests. Am Rev Respir Diagn 1983;2:43–45. |
| 29. | King TE Jr, Schwarz MI, Brown K, Tooze JA, Colby TV, Waldron JA Jr, Flint A, Thurlbeck W, Cherniack RM. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: relationship between histopathologic features and mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1025–1032. |
| 30. | Nicholson AG, Fulford LG, Colby TV, du Bois RM, Hansell DM, Wells AU. The relationship between individual histologic features and disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:173–177. |
| 31. | King TE, Tooze JA, Schwarz MI, Brown KR, Cherniack RM. Predicting survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: scoring system and survival model. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:1171–1181. |
| 32. | Raghu G, Mageto YN, Lockhart D, Schmidt RA, Wood DE, Godwin JD. The accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of new-onset idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and other interstitial lung disease. Chest 1999;116:1168–1174. |
| 33. | Hunninghake GW, Zimmerman MB, Schwartz DA, King TE Jr, Lynch J, Hegele R, Waldron J, Colby T, Muller N, Lynch D, et al. Utility of a lung biopsy for the diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;164:193–196. |