American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Previous studies of the insertion/deletion (I/D) polymorphism of the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene in sarcoidosis have revealed both ethnic heterogeneity of I/D frequencies and controversy surrounding the association between the polymorphism and severity of disease. The objective of this study was, therefore, to clarify the role of the ACE I/D polymorphism in (1) disease susceptibility, (2) pulmonary disease severity (with particular reference to pulmonary fibrosis), and (3) pulmonary disease progression, in two distinct European sarcoidosis populations. Standard chest radiographic staging was performed on 118 UK and 56 Czech white patients with sarcoidosis at 2 yr from presentation. Pulmonary function data were analyzed, and patients were then categorized according to disease severity. A PCR-SSP assay was used to determine the ACE I/D genotype of each patient studied. The I/D allele frequencies from these patients were compared with frequencies from ethnically matched UK (n = 386) and Czech (n = 179) control subjects using a chi-square contingency table. No significant differences were seen in the distribution of the ACE I/D genotypes, allele frequencies or phenotype frequencies. Furthermore, no association was found between the ACE I/D polymorphism and pulmonary disease severity, fibrosis, and progression. We conclude that the ACE I/D polymorphism has no role in sarcoidosis susceptibility in European whites and that it is not a regulatory variant in this disease.

Keywords: ACE; polymorphism; susceptibility gene; sarcoidosis; ethnicity

Elevated serum angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) levels are found in approximately 60% of patients with sarcoidosis (1). Although initially thought to be a useful tool in monitoring the clinical course of the disease, controversy now surrounds the role of ACE levels in sarcoidosis (2)

The gene-encoding ACE (or dipeptidyl carboxy peptidase 1: DCP1) is located on chromosome 17q35 and consists of 26 exons spread over approximately 24 kb. A 250-bp deletion/insertion polymorphism exists in intron 16 of the ACE gene and the deletion variant is associated with higher serum levels of the enzyme. Thus, serum ACE levels correspond to ACE insertion/deletion (I/D) genotypes in the order: II < ID < DD. This I/D polymorphism is reported to account for 47% of the phenotypic variation in serum ACE levels (3).

The discovery of the I/D polymorphism with its consequent effects on serum ACE levels has encouraged several studies in patients with sarcoidosis to determine whether this variation influences susceptibility to disease or disease outcome (Table 1). Two main conclusions can be drawn from these studies: (1) Sarcoidosis populations differ substantially in their I/D frequencies (For example, in the Japanese, the I allele is more common than in whites); (2) Controversy persists as to whether there is an association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and sarcoidosis disease severity (3, 9, 12, 13).

Table 1.  STUDIES OF THE ACE GENE INSERTION/DELETION POLYMORPHISM ALLELE FREQUENCIES IN SARCOIDOSIS*

StudyPopulationPatients (n)Control Subjects (n)PatientsControl Subjects
I (freq)D (freq)I (freq)D (freq)
Furuya et al (5)Japanese103341 0.61 0.39 0.67 0.33
Arbustini et al (3)Italian 61 800.36 0.64 0.40 0.60
Sharma et al (6)UK white 471460.45 0.55 0.48 0.52
Garrib et al (7)UK white 541000.37 0.63 0.47 0.53
Csaszar et al (8)Hungarian 31 290.40 0.60 0.35 0.65
Tomita et al (9)Japanese207314 0.62 0.38 0.65 0.35
Takemoto et al (10)Japanese100247 0.63 0.37 0.63 0.37
Nimi et al (11)Japanese 21 18 0.57 0.43
Maliarik et al (12)US white 60 480.48 0.52 0.420.58
African-
 American1831110.43 0.57 0.56 0.44
Pietinalho et al (13)Finnish 59 700.42 0.58 0.49 0.51

*The most common allele in each population is shown in bold.

Although some studies did not find an association between the ACE I/D polymorphism and sarcoidosis disease severity (3, 9), a study of Finnish patients (13) revealed an association between the deletion variant (D) and disease progression. In that study disease progression was defined as persistent chest radiographic changes and/or extrapulmonary disease at 5 yr from presentation. The association was identified only after the ID and DD genotypes were grouped together. In the African-American population (12) the reverse was the case: those with the insertion variant (I) had a threefold greater risk of chest radiographic progression after 2 yr, after grouping the ID and DD genotypes together. This association was not found in a US white population (12).

In a murine model of radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis (4) the extent of fibrosis was inversely correlated with the intrinsic lung activity of both plasminogen activator (PLA) and ACE, supporting the choice of the ACE gene as a strong candidate gene for the development of fibrosis in sarcoidosis. However, previous studies concerning the clinical significance of the ACE I/D polymorphism rendered contradictory findings. Our study, therefore, aimed to clarify whether the ACE I/D polymorphism is associated with: (1) sarcoidosis disease susceptibility; (2) pulmonary disease severity, particularly fibrosis at 2 and at 4 yr from presentation; (3) pulmonary disease progression at 2 and at 4 yr from presentation. We examined two distinct European populations in order to detect whether the effects of the polymorphisms, if any, are independent of geographic and ethnic bias.

Subjects

UK cases (n = 184) and Czech cases (n = 56) were recruited consecutively for the outpatient clinics at the Royal Brompton Hospital, London (tertiary referral center), and the Olomouc Hospital (secondary center). Informed consent for genetic analysis was obtained prior to phlebotomy. All patients had (1) clinical features of pulmonary sarcoidosis, (2) diagnosis confirmed on transbronchial, Kveim, or lymphnode biopsy, and (3) received the appropriate treatment for care of the disease. Age at presentation, sex, and treatment history of both the UK and Czech sarcoidosis populations studied are outlined in Table 2. Current smoking history, defined as the smoking history at the time of presentation and throughout a 2-yr follow up period, is also recorded.

Table 2.  DEMOGRAPHIC DATA FOR UK AND CZECH PATIENTS WITH SARCOIDOSIS

UK SarcoidCzech Sarcoid
(F )(M )(Total Pop.)(F )(M )(Total Pop.)
Patients, n84100184312556
Age at presentation, yr
 Mean40 39 40494346
 SEM10  8  9 9 9 9
Current smoker, n
 Yes 3  5  8 1 3 4
 No81 95176302252
Received treatment, n
 Yes66 80146202141
 No18 20 3811 415

The healthy control UK population data used for comparison were published previously (14) and comprised unmatched white patients (n = 386) of UK origin recruited from three centers: London, Cardiff, and Belfast. The Czech control population consisted of unrelated, age, sex, and ethnically matched white blood donors (n = 179) from a region close to Olomouc.

Although ethnic uniformity (defined as “uniformity of people with a common cultural heritage that sets them apart from others”: MeSH browser, Pubmed, National Library of Medicine) was thought to prevail within each group studied, it was assumed that the UK and Czech populations are ethnically distinct from each other. Project approval was granted by the local ethics committee at each of the centers.

Evaluating Sarcoidosis Pulmonary Disease Severity

Radiography. The chest radiographic series for each patient was examined and compared to determine disease course—when possible these comprised radiographs on presentation to hospital, followed by radiographs from 2 and 4 yr later, and the final/most recent radiograph. Each patient's radiographs were analyzed for disease severity by a respiratory physician using standard radiographic staging for sarcoidosis. Briefly, this staging comprises five broad stages: Stage 0, normal; Stage I, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy (BHL); Stage II, bilateral hilar lymphadenopathy and parenchymal infiltration; Stage III, parenchymal infiltration with early features of fibrosis; Stage IV, irreversible fibrosis with loss of lung volume. Those who improved were defined as those patients whose radiologic appearances had changed from a higher to a lower radiologic stage, and those who progressed were defined as those who had changed from a lower to a higher stage at these two time intervals. Radiologic appearances were otherwise classified as unchanged. As a quality control measure, another respiratory physician carried out a blind assessment of the chest radiographs. Comparison of radiograph staging from the two independent assessments showed that < 5% of the results differed.

Presentation chest radiographic data were available only on 129 of the 184 UK patients with sarcoidosis studied. The rest had been previously returned to their appropriate referring hospitals. Chest radiographs, taken at least 2 yr after initial presentation, were available on 118 of the UK patients. Of this group, a total of 101 had radiologic follow-up at 4 yr. The difference in patient numbers at presentation compared with 4 yr onwards is accounted for by the presence of patients in whom a diagnosis had been recently made in this study. These patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for study inclusion, but because their diagnosis dates were more recent, they had not been assessed by radiography for the preferred 4-yr period.

Although a complete radiologic time series was not available for the Czech patients, chest radiographs taken 2 yr from presentation were available on 56 patients. Pulmonary severity for both UK and Czech populations was therefore assessed on radiologic appearances at 2 yr after presentation.

In the absence of a complete radiologic series for the Czech population, ACE genotype and progression of chest radiographic appearances (from presentation to 4 yr) were analyzed only in the UK sarcoid population (n = 101). Patients with Stage IV disease at presentation (n = 18), by definition, cannot improve or worsen radiologically and were therefore omitted from analysis.

Pulmonary function testing. All patients who had pulmonary function performed in the same laboratory at presentation and at the 4-yr follow-up were included for analysis. Ninety-five patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria for assessment of pulmonary function. The following parameters were recorded: FEV1 and FVC (PK Morgan Instruments, Kent, England). Gas transfer measurements (Dl CO) were performed by using the carbon monoxide diffusing lung capacity single-breath technique and were adjusted for alveolar volume (6200 Autobox DL; Sensormedics, Yorba Linda, CA); the results were corrected for hemoglobin. Severity data were expressed as percent-predicted values. Disease progression data at 4 yr were expressed as the percentage change from presentation value.

Identification of the Polymorphism and Primer Sequences

Polymerase chain reaction with sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP) was used to determine the ACE I/D genotype of each person studied. The conditions were identical to those described previously (15). The forward and reverse primer sequences consisted of 5′-CTGGAGACCACTCCCATCCTTT-3′ and 5′-GATGTGGCCATCACATTCGT, respectively. From the 184 UK patients initially identified, 180 were successfully genotyped (98%); all 56 Czech sarcoid patients were typed.

Statistical Analysis

The MS-DOS computer package EpiInfo6 (available from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, USA via the internet http://www.cdc.gov/epo/epi/epiinfo.htm) was used to estimate the statistical power to detect significant differences between study groups given the group sizes and estimated/observed frequency of the factor being compared. The study was designed to predict an odds ratio of 2.0 with 80% confidence intervals (CI) and a power of 95%.

Statistical analysis of the ACE frequency and radiologic data for the two populations studied were calculated using chi-square contingency table analysis with the appropriate number of degrees of freedom. Analysis of pulmonary function data was performed using the Mann-Whitney U test. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.

ACE I/D Polymorphism and Sarcoidosis Susceptibility in UK and Czech Populations

The results of the ACE genotyping for the UK and Czech populations are given in Table 3. No significant difference was seen in the distribution of ACE I/D genotypes between patients and controls for allele, genotype, and phenotype frequencies.

Table 3.  ACE I/D GENOTYPING IN THE UK AND CZECH PATIENTS AND CONTROL SUBJECTS

UK Control Subjects (n = 386 )UK Patients (n = 180)Czech Control Subjects (n = 179)Czech Patients (n = 56 )
(n)(freq)(n)(freq)(n)(freq)(n)(freq)
Genotypes
 II 890.23 450.25 470.26170.30
 ID1800.47 840.47 940.53250.45
 DD1170.30 510.28 380.21140.25
Allele freq
 I3580.461740.481880.53590.53
 D4140.541860.521700.47530.47
Phenotype
 I2690.701290.721410.79420.75
 D2970.771350.751320.74390.70

Sarcoidosis Pulmonary Disease Severity

Radiology. For the 101 UK patients with a complete 4-yr chest radiographic series, the proportion of patients in each of the four severity categories varied according to the time points (Figure 1). At presentation, the proportions comprised 0% normal or Stage 0, 22.8% Stage I, 33.7% Stage II, 20.8% Stage III, and 22.7% Stage IV. At the 2-yr, 4-yr, and most recent/current assessment points, the proportions of patients in Stages II and III were found to have fallen dramatically, whereas the proportions in Stages I and IV had risen.

The patients included in the Czech group were found to represent all stages of disease severity, from those patients who had a normal chest radiograph appearance, to those who had features of permanent fibrotic changes. The stratification of patients according to disease severity in the UK and Czech populations is given in Table 4. No association was identified between ACE I/D genotype, allele or phenotype frequency, and each radiographic severity group in either sarcoid population.

Table 4.  UK AND CZECH PULMONARY SARCOIDOSIS SEVERITY ANALYSIS-CHEST RADIOGRAPH STAGING RESULTS

StagingUK SarcoidCzech Sarcoid
Present (n = 129)Two Years (n = 118)Four Years (n = 101)Two Years (n = 56)
(n)(%)(n)(%)(n)(%)(n)(%)
Normal/0 4 3.11411.91413.9 1 1.8
I3627.92521.22827.72850
II4031.03630.51918.81933.9
III2317.81411.9 5 4.9 814.3
IV2620.12924.63534.7 0 0

The distribution of the severity groups (normal/Stage 0 = 1.8%, Stage I = 50%, Stage II = 33.9%, Stage III = 14.3%, and Stage IV = 0%) in the Czech population differed from that of the UK population (normal/Stage 0 = 11.9%, Stage I = 21.2%, Stage II = 30.5%, Stage III = 11.9%, and Stage IV = 24.6%) for the same 2-yr time interval. The clinical significance of this is difficult to ascertain.

Pulmonary function testing. The median percentages of predicted values (range) at presentation for the three pulmonary function parameters were as follows: FEV1 = 91 (26 to 136)%; FVC = 98 (33 to 146)%; Dl CO = 77 (20 to 145)%. When analyzed for ACE I/D genotype, the mean percentages of predicted values (± SDs) of FEV1, FVC, and Dl CO (Figure 2) at presentation were remarkably similar for all three subgroups: II (FEV1 = 85.7 ± 23.7%, FVC = 96.5 ± 22.7%, Dl CO = 70.4 ± 18.7), ID (FEV1 = 83.1 ± 23.0%, FVC = 96.1 ± 15.2, Dl CO = 74.6 ± 14.9) and DD (FEV1 = 87.5 ± 22.1, FVC = 96.0 ± 21.4%, Dl CO = 75.3 ± 23.4). Likewise, no difference was demonstrated between phenotype and allele frequency data and disease severity defined on pulmonary function testing.

ACE I/D Polymorphism and Pulmonary Fibrosis

Analysis of ACE I/D genotype in relation to pulmonary fibrosis did not reveal any significant findings for either the UK (p = 0.9) or Czech (p = 0.7) populations.

ACE I/D Polymorphism and Pulmonary Disease Progression

Radiology. Thirty-eight patients (46%) demonstrated radiologic improvement, 26 (31%) progression, and 19 (23%) no change. An association was not identified between genotype frequency and radiographic progression at 2 yr or at 4 yr (Figure 3) from presentation. Similarly, no association was detected for phenotype or allele (Table 5) frequency. The genotypes were then grouped in a similar method (II + ID versus DD and ID + DD versus II) to the previous studies (12, 13). This approach revealed an association between carriage of the I allele (II + ID versus DD) and disease progression (p = 0.02).

Table 5.  ACE I/D ALLELE FREQUENCY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROGNOSIS AT 4 yr IN UK POPULATION

PrognosisAllele Frequency
ID
Stable/Improved0.330.35
Progressed0.170.14

From the radiologic data it was seen that, over time, the patients' distribution tended to taper toward the two extremes, i.e., normal (Stage 0) or severe (Stage IV) disease (Figure 1). Because the largest changes in distribution were seen in patients with Stages II and III, these were analyzed more closely to determine if there was an association between ACE I/D genotype and progression from Stage II/III to Stages I or IV. Again no association was detected.

Pulmonary function testing. No significant differences and no marginal trends in FEV1, FVC, or Dl CO (Figure 4) over a 4-yr period were detected when comparison was made for the three ACE I/D genotype groups (Table 6). Similarly, no associations were identified between pulmonary function testing and ACE I/D phenotype or allele frequency. In contrast to radiologic progression, genotype grouping did not yield any differences in pulmonary disease progression defined on lung function testing.

Table 6.  UK AND CZECH PULMONARY SARCOIDOSIS PROGRESSION ANALYSIS AT 4 yr*

Pulmonary FunctionGenotypeComparisonp Value
II (n = 20)ID (n = 41)DD (n = 34)
Median (Range)Median (Range)Median (Range)
II vs DD0.1
FEV1%−5.8−4.00.3II vs ID0.5
(−24.5 to +32.9)(−70.3 to +95.9)(−22.2 to +53.3)DD vs ID0.3
II vs DD0.2
FVC%−4.1−5.71.8II vs ID0.9
(−36.5 to +33.6)(−95.0 to +19.1)(−34.9 to +64.6)DD vs ID0.1
Dl CO%−3.4−1.3−6.75II vs DD0.9
(−37.3 to +43.4)(−46.7 to +45.5)(−82.8 to +65.5)II vs ID0.6
DD vs ID0.9

*Serial changes in lung function, defined as median values of percent predicted.

This study was designed to attempt to clarify the relationship between the ACE I/D polymorphism and the severity and progression of lung disease in sarcoidosis. In order to remove any bias of local geographic or ethnic differences, UK white and Slavic (Czech) white patient cohorts were studied. We found no association between genotype or allele frequencies and disease severity and progression in either of these populations.

The large number of previous association studies examining the ACE I/D polymorphism in this disease reflects the interest in the role of this gene in sarcoidosis. The ACE I/D polymorphism has been shown to affect serum ACE levels (3). However, controversy surrounds not only the role of serum ACE levels in sarcoidosis but also the ACE I/D polymorphism in sarcoidosis susceptibility and disease progression. This study aimed to clarify this role and to look particularly for a relationship between the polymorphism and pulmonary fibrosis with which serum ACE levels are associated. The results from this study do not support a role for the ACE I/D polymorphism in sarcoidosis susceptibility in the United Kingdom and Czech white populations. This concurs with the findings of Maliarik and colleagues (12) in the United States white populaton but differs from the African-American population, which showed an increased risk for sarcoidosis associated with ID heterozygotes (RR = 1.3; 95% CI = 0.72 to 2.36) and DD homozygotes (RR = 3.17; 95% CI = 1.5 to 6.71). Furthermore, disease progression was paradoxically associated with the II variant in the latter population. The difference in findings between the white and African-American populations suggests that the role of the I/D polymorphism is population-dependent. Consistent with this is that a racial difference in the relationship between serum ACE levels and the I/D polymorphism has been reported (16).

This study did not demonstrate any association between ACE I/D genotype or allele frequency and pulmonary disease severity or progression in two distinct European white sarcoid populations. These findings concur with those of Papadopoulos and colleagues (17) who found no association between isolated cases of sarcoidosis and disease severity despite observing a significant increase in DD genotype in patients with coexisting autoimmune disease and sarcoidosis and chest radiographic Stage III. Genotype grouping analysis (II + ID versus DD and DD + ID versus II) in this study revealed an association between carriage of the insertion allele (II + ID) and radiographic progression. However, physiologic assessment of disease progression yielded no association. These findings differ from those of the Finnish study of white individuals in which an association between disease progression and the deletion variant was found. Although the United States African-American study revealed a similar association between the insertion variant and radiologic progression, the use of radiologic change as the sole criterion for progression of sarcoidosis is suspect. Furthermore, as the functional role of the homozygote and heterozygote states of the ACE I/D polymorphism remain unknown, clear conclusions cannot be derived from genotype grouping. Analysis of allele frequency, as in this study, may be more informative.

No association was demonstrated between the ACE I/D polymorphism and pulmonary fibrosis in the two sarcoid populations we studied. This is the first study to look for an association with lung fibrosis specifically. Approximately 20% of patients with sarcoidosis develop fibrosis (18). Although data from the Czech population in this study were in keeping with this number (14%), the United Kingdom population contained a significantly higher proportion of subjects with fibrosis (47%). The main reason for this is the patient population from which the United Kingdom group was recruited. These patients were derived from a specialist tertiary respiratory hospital to which asymptomatic patients are less likely to be referred. Furthermore, as those with more severe disease are followed at more frequent intervals and for a longer period, the likelihood of these patients being recruited to this study was higher.

One criticism of this study is that the control United Kingdom data were unmatched for age and sex, which could account for the absence of any association between ACE I/D genotype and sarcoidosis susceptibility and pulmonary severity or progression. However, as there was no significant difference in ACE I/D genotype distribution between this unmatched control United Kingdom population and control data from previously published United Kingdom studies (6, 7), we believe our comparison to be acceptable. Furthermore, as the genotype frequency in both United Kingdom and Czech patients are similar to the patient data from the two United Kingdom studies of whites mentioned as well as patient data from the aforementioned United States white group (12), this suggests that the results in this study are not biased by either ethnic or geographic population similarities or variations.

In summary, we aimed to clarify the role of the ACE I/D polymorphism in sarcoidosis susceptibility and specifically pulmonary severity, fibrosis, and progression. We conclude that the I/D polymorphism has no role in sarcoidosis susceptibility in European white individuals and that it is not a regulatory variant in this disease. We believe that an additional functional variant, possibly in linkage with the I/D polymorphism, exists within the ACE gene. This variant may have a regulatory region that contains a response element to either the causal agent of sarcoidosis or to a mediator that this agent releases. This theory is supported by the work of Rigat and colleagues (19) and Tiret and coworkers (20) who demonstrated that the I/D polymorphism accounted for only 47 and 28% of the phenotypic variance of serum ACE, respectively. A recent sequence variation analysis of the complete dipeptidyl carboxypeptidase-I (angiotensin-I-converting enzyme) DCP1 gene and its flanking regions revealed 78 polymorphisms within the ACE gene that can be grouped into three main haplotype branches (21, 22). Of these 78 polymorphisms, five resulted in amino acid changes. Further genetic studies are necessary to identify which of these polymorphisms provides the functional basis of the ACE gene. This knowledge will allow us to determine the exact contribution of this gene in sarcoidosis.

The authors would like to thank the staff of the Olomouc Bronchology Unit and Dr. Drabek for his assistance in collecting DNA samples of Czech patients.

1. Sharma OP, Said ADiagnosis, pathogenesis, and treatment of sarcoidosis. Curr Opin Respir Med11995392400
2. Newman LS, Rose CS, Maier LASarcoidosis. N Engl J Med336199712241234
3. Arbustini E, Grasso M, Leo G, Tinelli C, Fasani R, Diegoli M, Banchieri M, Cipriani A, Gorrini M, Semenzato G, et al.. Polymorphism of angiotensin-converting enzyme gene in sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1531996851854
4. Franko AJ, Sharplin J, Ward WF, Taylor JMEvidence for 2 patterns of inheritance of sensitivity to induction of lung fibrosis in mice by radiation, one of which involves 2 genes. Radiat Res14619966874
5. Furuya K, Yamaguchi E, Itoh A, Hizawa N, Ohnuma J, Kodama N, Kawakami YDeletion polymorphism in the angiotensin-1 converting-enzyme (ACE) gene as a genetic risk factor for sarcoidosis. Thorax511996777780
6. Sharma P, Smith I, Maguire G, Stewart S, Shneerson J, Brown MJClinical value of ACE genotyping in diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Lancet349199716021603
7. Garrib A, Zhou W, Sherwood R, Peters TAngiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism in patients with sarcoidosis. Biochem Soc Trans261998S137
8. Csaszar A, Halmos B, Palicz T, Szalai C, Romics LInterpopulation effect of ACE I/D polymorphism on serum concentration of ACE in diagnosis of sarcoidosis. Lancet3501997518
9. Tomita H, Ina Y, Sugiura Y, Sato S, Kawaguchi H, Morishita M, Yamamoto M, Ueda RPolymorphism in the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) gene and sarcoidosis. Am J Resp Crit Care Med1561997255259
10. Takemoto Y, Sakatani M, Takami S, Tachibana T, Higaki J, Ogihara T, Miki T, Katsuya T, Tsuchiyama T, Yoshida A, et al.. Association between angiotensin II receptor gene polymorphism and serum angiotensin converting enzyme (SACE) activity in patients with sarcoidosis. Thorax531998459462
11. Nimi T, Tomita H, Sato S, Mori T, Kawaguchi H, Sugiura YBronchial responsiveness and angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism in sarcoidosis patients. Chest1141998495499
12. Maliarik MJ, Rybicki BA, Malvitz E, Sheffer RG, Major M, Popovich J, Iannuzzi MCAngiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism and risk of sarcoidosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med158199815661570
13. Pietinalho A, Furuya K, Yamaguchi E, Kawakami K, Selroos OThe angiotensin-converting enzyme DD gene is associated with poor prognosis in Finnish sarcoidosis patients. Eur Respir J131999723726
14. Kehoe PG, Russ C, McIlroy S, Williams H, Holmans P, Holmes C, Liolitsa D, Vahidassr D, Powell J, McGleenon B, et al. Variation in DCP1, encoding ACE, is associated with susceptibility to Alzheimer's disease. Nat Genet 1999;21;71–72.
15. Bunce M, O'Neill CM, Barnardo MC, Krausa P, Browning MJ, Welsh KIPhototyping: comprehensive DNA typing for HLA-A, HLA-B, HLA-C, DRB1, DRB3, DRB4, DRB5 and DQB1 by PCR with 144 primer mixes utilizing sequence-specific primers (PCR-SSP). Tissue Antigens461995355367
16. Bloem LJ, Manatunga AK, Pratt JHRacial difference in the relationship of an angiotensin I-converting enzyme gene polymorphism to serum angiotensin I-converting enzyme activity. Hypertension2719966266
17. Papadopoulos KI, Melander O, Orho-Melander M, Groop LC, Carlsson M, Hallengren BAngiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene polymorphism in sarcoidosis in relation to associated autoimmune disease. J Intern Med24720007177
18. Sharma OP. Clinical features. In: Sarcoidosis: clinical management, 6th ed. London: Butterworths; 1996. p. 22–24.
19. Rigat B, Hubert C, Alhenc-Gelas F, Cambien F, Carvol P, Soubrier FAn insertion/deletion polymorphism in the angiotensin 1-converting enzyme gene accounting for half the variance of serum enzyme levels. J Clin Invest86199013431346
20. Tiret L, Rigat B, Visvikis S, Breda C, Corvol P, Cambien F, Soubrier FEvidence, from combined segregation and linkage analysis, that a variant of the angiotensin 1-converting enzyme (ACE) gene controls plasma ACE levels. Am J Hum Genet511992197205
21. Reider MJ, Taylor SL, Clark AG, Nickerson DASequence variation in the human angiotensin converting enzyme. Nat Genet2219995962
22. Keavney B, McKenzie CA, Connell JM, Julier C, Ratcliffe PJ, Lathrop M, Farrall MMeasured haplotype analysis of the angiotensin-I converting enzyme gene. Hum Mol Genet7199817451751
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Prof. R.M. du Bois, Interstitial Lung Disease Unit, Department of Occupational & Environmental Medicine, National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College of Science, Technology & Medicine, London, SW3 6LR, UK. E-mail

Participation of the Olomouc investigators was supported by grant aid from the Czech Government (MSMT: CEZ J 14/98 151100002).

Related

No related items
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
164
2

Click to see any corrections or updates and to confirm this is the authentic version of record