American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Rationale: Patients with diabetes represent almost 20% of all ICU admissions and might respond differently to high-dose early active mobilization.

Objectives: To assess whether diabetes modified the relationship between the dose of early mobilization on clinical outcomes in the TEAM trial.

Methods: All TEAM trial patients were included. The primary outcome was days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180. Secondary outcomes included 180-day mortality and long-term functional outcomes at Day 180. Logistic and median regression models were used to explore the effect of high-dose early mobilization on outcomes by diabetes status.

Measurements and Main Results: All 741 patients from the original trial were included. Of these, 159 patients (21.4%) had diabetes. Patients with diabetes had fewer days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180 (124 [0–153] vs. 147 [82–164]; P = 0.013) and higher 180-day mortality (30% vs. 18%; P = 0.044). In patients receiving high-dose early mobilization, the number of days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180 was 73.0 (0.0–144.5) in patients with diabetes and 146.5 (95.8–163.0) in patients without diabetes (P value for interaction = 0.108). However, in patients with diabetes, high-dose early mobilization increased the odds of mortality at 180 days (adjusted odds ratio, 3.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.67–7.61; P value for interaction = 0.001).

Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of the TEAM trial, in patients with diabetes, a high-dose early mobilization strategy did not significantly decrease the number of days alive and out of the hospital at Day 180, but it increased 180-day mortality.

Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Carol L. Hodgson, Ph.D., Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Research Centre, 553 St. Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. E-mail: .

* A complete list of investigators in the TEAM trial is provided in the online supplement.

Supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and the Health Research Council of New Zealand.

Authors Contributions: Conception and design: A.S.N., M.B., R.B., P.J.Y., and C.L.H. Acquisition of data: all authors. Data analysis: A.S.N. and M.B. Interpretation of data: all authors. Drafting the work or reviewing it: all authors. Final approval: all authors.

This article has a related editorial.

A data supplement for this article is available via the Supplements tab at the top of the online article.

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202312-2289OC on May 19, 2024

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

Comments Post a Comment




New User Registration

Not Yet Registered?
Benefits of Registration Include:
 •  A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)
 •  The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level
 •  The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
210
6

Click to see any corrections or updates and to confirm this is the authentic version of record