For patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), mechanical ventilation is often an obligatory life-saving intervention. Mechanical ventilation itself may, however, evoke ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI) (1). In spite of lung-protective ventilation strategies with, for example, low Vt having been implemented into clinical practice (2), ventilated areas of ARDS lungs may still encounter injurious transparenchymal forces because of a marked reduction in aerated lung size (“baby lung”). The absence of a definite safety threshold for VILI therefore necessitates further efforts to minimize VILI, even more so as the requirement for mechanical power to ensure adequate ventilation increases the sicker the patient is. To solve this obvious dilemma, personalized ventilation and novel therapeutic strategies based on point-of-care monitoring of the mechanical forces acting on the lung tissue and better insight into the mechanotransduction pathways that convert these forces into injurious cellular responses are required. To this end, a body of work has identified various inflammatory and barrier-disruptive mediators as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets in VILI. Yet, this knowledge has so far not translated into improved patient care or novel treatment approaches.
In this issue of the Journal, Koh and colleagues (pp. 421–430) report findings from animal experiments and patient sample analyses that suggest secreted extracellular CypA (cyclophilin A) as a biomarker and mediator of VILI (3). Originally, Handschumacher and colleagues had identified CypA as a ubiquitously expressed cytosolic protein that intracellularly binds cyclosporin A, thereby mediating its immunosuppressive activity (4). Subsequently, CypA was shown to also serve as an extracellular signaling molecule that can be secreted by endothelial and epithelial cells, monocytes, or macrophages in response to, for example, oxidative stress or LPS and then acts as a proinflammatory cytokine in acute and chronic inflammatory diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, coronary artery disease, or sepsis (5). CypA is considered to exert its proinflammatory effects by activation of the transmembrane protein CD147, a member of the immunoglobulin superfamily expressed by many cell types, including epithelial cells, endothelial cells, and leukocytes. Of late, CypA was also identified as an endogenous ligand for another immunoglobulin superfamily receptor, TREM-2 (triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2), to which it binds with even higher affinity to elicit both pro- and antiinflammatory responses (6). Yet, despite abundant evidence for CypA’s involvement in inflammatory processes, its role in acute lung injury and specifically VILI has so far not been addressed.
In their present study, Koh and colleagues show CypA levels to be 5- to 6-fold elevated in the BAL fluid (BALF) of patients with ARDS as compared with healthy volunteers and similarly in mice ventilated with excessive Vt of 35–40 ml/kg body weight as compared with mice undergoing lung-protective ventilation. In overventilated mice, flow cytometric analyses detected a concomitant decrease in intracellular CypA in alveolar epithelial cells but not in alveolar macrophages, whereas cyclic stretch of primary human alveolar epithelial cells in vitro resulted in CypA secretion into the supernatant. In vivo, CypA blockade by MM-284, a nonimmunosuppressive cyclosporin A derivative that inhibits CypA extracellular signaling, improved survival and classic parameters of lung injury in overventilated mice, including lung function and oxygenation, and reduced alveolocapillary barrier dysfunction and epithelial injury. Ex vivo stimulation with recombinant CypA induced inflammatory responses in human monocyte-derived macrophages, including IL-6 secretion, yet not in primary alveolar epithelial cells. These data thus suggest a scenario in which overventilation causes CypA secretion from stretched alveolar epithelial cells, which in turn activates alveolar macrophages, triggering proinflammatory responses that will ultimately drive alveolocapillary barrier failure and impaired lung function and oxygenation (Figure 1). Although this concept is coherent, the exact cellular sources of CypA in VILI, its auto- or paracrine target cells, and the individual receptors mediating these effects (e.g., CD147 vs. TREM2) remain to be validated in vivo by cell-specific conditional knockout models and/or single-cell transcriptomic analyses.
May CypA hence present a promising therapeutic target to reduce lung injury and improve survival in patients with ARDS? The following aspects should be considered. First, although MM-284 attenuated lung injury in overventilated lungs of naïve mice, evidence that CypA blockade similarly reduces VILI in lungs preinjured by, for example, pneumonia or sepsis is presently lacking. The plethora of inflammatory pathways triggered in such critical inflammatory conditions may simply outweigh the benefits of CypA blockade in VILI. On the other hand, therapeutic effects of CypA blockade in ARDS may not be restricted to VILI but may also target inflammatory pathways of ARDS and its underlying diseases. Although this might point toward a broader therapeutic potential of CypA blockade, it also raises the question of the perfect timing for this intervention. In their preclinical study, Koh and colleagues tested the prophylactic administration before overventilation, which may be translated into treatment start right before intubation in a patient. Unless CypA blockade also has therapeutic potential to reverse rather than prevent ongoing inflammation, however, this approach may prove too late if CypA already contributes critically to the inflammatory condition that is the cause for intubation. Analogously, it remains to be shown whether increased CypA levels in the BALF of patients with ARDS are specific for mechanical ventilation or equally present in patients with nonventilated sepsis or pneumonia, which would preclude the use of CypA as a specific biomarker for VILI.
Second, recent work by Calfee and colleagues identified specific subphenotypes of ARDS, which display major differences not only in terms of presentation but also in response to therapy, stressing the need for personalized therapy (7, 8). As such, a potential treatment response to CypA blockade may be restricted to specific endotypes. Based on CypA’s role as a proinflammatory mediator, it is tempting to speculate that CypA blockade may be particularly effective in patients with an inflammatory phenotype, yet this notion remains to be tested.
Third, therapeutic CypA blockade should probably be commenced as early as possible in the course of the disease. To identify appropriate patients promptly, CypA would ideally be used as a theragnostic or, in other words, as both a biomarker and therapeutic target. As CypA was increased in BALF but not plasma, theragnostic CypA quantification would require BALF sampling, which is typically not feasible in spontaneously breathing patients acutely deteriorating toward the need for intubation. Thus, the earliest time to obtain BALF is commonly after intubation, which would require point-of-care CypA testing capabilities to ensure a timely start of targeted therapy in case of increased CypA levels.
Although experimental research published in this issue of the Journal has thus laid an important foundation for CypA targeting as a putative new therapeutic strategy in ARDS, considerable translational hurdles remain, which necessitate in-depth follow-up analyses to better understand CypA’s mode of action, the exact cell types and signaling pathways involved, and further translational experimental studies to evaluate its diagnostic and therapeutic potential in ARDS and VILI, respectively.
1. | Slutsky AS, Ranieri VM. Ventilator-induced lung injury. N Engl J Med 2013;369:2126–2136. |
2. | Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:1301–1308. |
3. | Koh MW, Baldi RF, Soni S, Handslip R, Tan YY, O’Dea KP, et al. Secreted extracellular cyclophilin A is a novel mediator of ventilator-induced lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2021;204:421–430. |
4. | Handschumacher RE, Harding MW, Rice J, Drugge RJ, Speicher DW. Cyclophilin: a specific cytosolic binding protein for cyclosporin A. Science 1984;226:544–547. |
5. | Hoffmann H, Schiene-Fischer C. Functional aspects of extracellular cyclophilins. Biol Chem 2014;395:721–735. |
6. | Ji KY, Kim SM, Yee SM, Kim MJ, Ban YJ, Kim EM, et al. Cyclophilin A is an endogenous ligand for the triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-2 (TREM2). FASEB J 2021;35:e21479. |
7. | Calfee CS, Delucchi K, Parsons PE, Thompson BT, Ware LB, Matthay MA; NHLBI ARDS Network. Subphenotypes in acute respiratory distress syndrome: latent class analysis of data from two randomised controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med 2014;2:611–620. |
8. | Famous KR, Delucchi K, Ware LB, Kangelaris KN, Liu KD, Thompson BT, et al.; ARDS Network. Acute respiratory distress syndrome subphenotypes respond differently to randomized fluid management strategy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195: 331–338. |
Supported by grants from the German Research Foundation (SFB-TR84 C6 and C9, SFB 1449 B1 and B2, KU1218/9-1, and KU1218/11-1) and the German Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the CAPSyS (01ZX1304B), CAPSyS-COVID (01ZX1604B), SYMPATH (01ZX1906A), PROVID (01KI20160A) P4C (16GW0141), MAPVAP (16GW0247), and NUM-NAPKON (01KX2021).
Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.202104-0919ED on May 25, 2021
Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.