American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Female sex/gender is an undercharacterized variable in studies related to lung development and disease. Notwithstanding, many aspects of lung and sleep biology and pathobiology are impacted by female sex and female reproductive transitions. These may manifest as differential gene expression or peculiar organ development. Some conditions are more prevalent in women, such as asthma and insomnia, or, in the case of lymphangioleiomyomatosis, are seen almost exclusively in women. In other diseases, presentation differs, such as the higher frequency of exacerbations experienced by women with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or greater cardiac morbidity among women with sleep-disordered breathing. Recent advances in -omics and behavioral science provide an opportunity to specifically address sex-based differences and explore research needs and opportunities that will elucidate biochemical pathways, thus enabling more targeted/personalized therapies. To explore the status of and opportunities for research in this area, the NHLBI, in partnership with the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health and the Office of Rare Diseases Research, convened a workshop of investigators in Bethesda, Maryland on September 18 and 19, 2017. At the workshop, the participants reviewed the current understanding of the biological, behavioral, and clinical implications of female sex and gender on lung and sleep health and disease, and formulated recommendations that address research gaps, with a view to achieving better health outcomes through more precise management of female patients with nonneoplastic lung disease. This report summarizes those discussions.

The NIH is committed to improving the health of all individuals. Central to this mission is supporting research that informs prevention and treatment strategies for both men and women. The role of sex and gender in scientific discovery, disease detection, diagnosis, and treatment is often underappreciated. To this end, the NHLBI, in partnership with the NIH Office of Research on Women’s Health and the Office of Rare Diseases Research, convened a 2-day workshop of investigators in Bethesda, Maryland in September 2017. At the workshop, the participants, chosen based on their expertise in women’s health as it applies to various aspects of lung and sleep medicine, reviewed the current understanding of the biological, behavioral, and clinical implications of female sex and gender on lung and sleep health and disease. Topics were chosen by the NHLBI and workshop chairs. Experts presented data with subsequent discussion. After the workshop, electronic discussions continued with participants formulating recommendations that address research gaps, with a view to achieving better health outcomes through more precise management of female patients with nonneoplastic lung disease.

Central to these discussions at the outset was to be precise regarding the difference between the terms “sex” and “gender.” Whereas “sex” refers to biological differences between females and males, including chromosomes, sex organs, and endogenous hormonal profiles, “gender” refers to socially constructed and enacted roles and behaviors, which occur in a historical and cultural context and vary not only across societies and over time, but may also impact individuals differently across the lifespan. Gender encompasses factors, such as social support, environmental exposures, and work roles (i.e., shift work exposure causing circadian misalignment is prevalent in women). Ultimately, health is influenced by the interactions between both sex and gender. However, including women and diverse populations in research is not just a matter of enrolling women and diverse populations in clinical studies, but requires changing current paradigms of how research is designed. Researchers must consider the impact that their experimental design has on the sex hormonal profile and accurately analyze data focusing on the impact of sex, not only of the individual being studied, but also of the cell used in an in vitro experiment. Treating all adults as equivalent, drawing conclusions devoid of sex, gender, age, race, and environment, is imprecise, and focusing research only on one sex or gender to the exclusion of the other is no longer acceptable (1). Exploring the potential influences of both sex and gender on lung and sleep research is the focus of this report.

Sex Hormones in Lung Development and Disease

Inherent sex differences in human lung structure and function are apparent even in utero, and manifest throughout the lifespan (2). Sex differences in lung structure/function at puberty, pregnancy, menopause, and in aging suggest additional modulatory roles of sex steroids (estrogen, progesterone, testosterone) and/or their metabolites. Relationships between sex steroids and lung structure/function are underscored by sex differences in susceptibility to and incidence and severity of, for example, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pulmonary fibrosis, lung cancers, and pulmonary hypertension. A greater female-to-male ratio, or worse outcomes in women, emphasize the need to understand the relative roles of intrinsic sex differences versus the roles of sex steroids per se (particularly female sex steroids) in disease pathophysiology. Appreciation of how sex steroids or their metabolites exert their action, both as gonadally derived hormones and locally produced, may be important. Furthermore, it is necessary to understand the likely substantial cellular, tissue, or even species heterogeneity in basic sex steroid and receptor signaling pathways, as well as interactions between sex steroids. Understanding the role of sex steroid signaling in the lung could contribute to development of novel biomarkers and therapeutic strategies to target lung diseases (3).

Tobacco Use, Sex/Gender, and Lung Disease

Tobacco use is the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality in the United States, resulting in roughly 500,000 deaths yearly (4). The disease risks from smoking by women, including lung disease, have risen sharply over the last 50 years, and are now equal to those for men (5). Historically, males have initiated tobacco substance abuse at earlier ages and in higher proportions than females (6), although current smoking prevalence for teenage boys and girls is roughly similar (7). Unfortunately, the age of smoking initiation for most adults who smoke is before 18 years of age (7). Limited reports suggest that early tobacco initiation may be associated with delayed puberty in both girls and boys (8, 9). The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has outlined a strategy to reduce tobacco-related disease, which includes minimizing the abuse liability of cigarettes, and investigating whether “less harmful” tobacco/nicotine products can support this public health goal (10). It is critical to understand whether this approach would be equally effective for women and men. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration is also supporting research evaluating whether reduced-nicotine cigarettes translate to reductions in smoking behavior. It is more difficult for women to quit smoking, and women’s smoking behavior is less tied to nicotine content and nicotine-related reinforcement. Continued research designed to investigate sex and gender differences in response to reduced-nicotine-content cigarettes is critical. The prevalence of e-cigarette use continues to increase, especially among adolescents. There is much conflicting data about whether e-cigarettes contribute to smoking cessation behavior, and it is unknown whether there are sex differences in these relationships or in their health impact. Animal models of tobacco exposure have just begun to explore some of these issues.

Circadian Rhythms, Sex/Gender, and Lung Disease

Circadian rhythms are endogenous variations in physiology resulting from feedback loops that produce rhythms in gene expression with a cycle length of approximately 24 hours (11). The suprachiasmatic nucleus, a master pacemaker in the hypothalamus, receives light/dark information, synchronizes this system to the 24-hour solar day, and then transmits timing information to the rest of the body via autonomic and endocrine signals. Cells, tissues, and organs of the body also receive circadian timing information from feeding and other behaviors. When synchronized and optimally timed, the circadian system allows the body to anticipate and prepare for regular physiologic challenges (11). However, access to artificial light, irregular sleep schedules, travel across time zones, shift work, and other aspects of modern 24/7 society can desynchronize these rhythms, resulting in suboptimal functioning in the short term and, over the longer term, increase the risk of cardiovascular disease, diabetes, cancer, depression, and reproductive complications, among other conditions affecting women. Sex differences in key features of the human circadian system may result in differential susceptibility to circadian misalignment, circadian rhythm sleep disorders, and circadian-coupled pathophysiology disease risk in men and women (12). In fact, in a clinical study where sleep–wake cycle was purposefully disrupted, women experienced more cognitive impairment than men, suggesting that women may be more susceptible to the effects of shift work and jet lag (13). Nearly half of protein-coding genes show circadian expression, and there is major overlap of those genes with disease-associated genes and molecular targets of medications. These discoveries may be leveraged to identify circadian-dependent molecular signatures and mechanisms of disease pathophysiology to improve the prevention and management of diseases affecting women’s health across the lifespan (14).

Microbiome, Sex/Gender, and Lung Disease

The human microbiome, a complex system comprised of bacteria, viruses, fungi, and archaea that inhabit various niches, plays a role in a number of diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes, obesity, and cancer. Several reasons point to a potential influence of sex and gender on the microbiome. Differences in anatomy, environmental exposures, hormones, and medications may alter both the types of microbes present at a given body site and their functions. Cross-talk between the host and microbes may occur via effects of sex hormones on bacterial growth and signaling, as well as through bacterial metabolism of sex hormones. The microbiome may also differ over the lifespan and across reproductive phases, such as puberty, pregnancy, and menopause. There may also be sex differences in the microbial community structure and function in the gut, where most microbiome studies have so far been focused. The microbiome of the lung is less-well understood. Investigators are exploring the role of the lung microbiome in diseases, such as asthma, cystic fibrosis (CF), and COPD, but very little has been reported about the influence of sex and gender. A study of patients with CF found that exacerbations increased during the menstrual cycle in correspondence of higher estradiol levels, and women taking oral contraceptives had fewer exacerbations (15). In a mouse asthma model of vitamin D supplementation, investigators reported that the lung microbiome differed in male and female mice (16).

Animal and Cellular Models of Lung Disease and Sex/Gender

Understanding of the biology and pathobiology of lung disease has been greatly enhanced by the availability of animal models of lung diseases (17). However, many variables in mouse experimental models, including sex, can confound comparisons among papers published from different groups, but often go unreported. It is critical that investigators provide detailed reporting of their model(s). This is of particular importance when modeling lifespan stages (puberty, adulthood, old age) in animal models. Asthma is a prime example where discrepancies exist in the literature (18). Due to differences in lung structure, the inflammatory response, and airway hyperresponsiveness to allergens in mouse versus human lungs, developing animal models that attempt to more closely resemble different human asthma endotypes is warranted (19). There is a need to better model and understand the effect of female sex and obesity on allergic lung inflammation, as well as premenstrual exacerbations, de novo asthma postmenopause, and severe steroid-resistant asthma (20, 21). Animal models have also been widely used to study tobacco smoke exposure (22, 23), but there is a scarcity of experimental data on sex differences. Evidence suggests that increased small airway wall remodeling is observed in female compared with male mice (24, 25). Data on airspace enlargement are less conclusive, with reports that cigarette smoke–induced emphysema occurs more readily in female compared with male mice, whereas other studies did not observe differences between sexes (26, 27). Clearly, further studies are warranted to assess sex differences in animal models of COPD. These same principles are relevant to cell lines where sex, age, time of collection, and culture conditions must also be carefully considered and detailed (28). The products of the X and Y genes include functions beyond those related to development of sex hormones. Differential gene expression by sex has been noted in many tissues, and may have marked impact on biology. However, a review of articles published in 2013 in the American Journal of Physiology–Cell Physiology, which requires sex of cell lines to be reported, demonstrated 20% of cell lines used to be of male origin, 5% female, and the other 75% still unreported (29). To further illustrate, of the most commonly used lung epithelial cell lines reported in that journal, both are of male origin. Yet male sex has also been associated with reduced alveolar epithelial sodium transport capacity (30) and impaired regenerative capacity after injury (31), demonstrating the importance of accounting for cell sex in respiratory research

Asthma

Asthma is caused by complex heterogeneous pathological processes that affect the airways (32). In females, asthma is influenced by the rise during puberty, and then fluctuating levels, of sex hormones. Early-onset menarche resulting in greater cumulative estrogen and progesterone increases the risk of asthma (33). Asthma incidence and hazard rate increases in women on hormone replacement therapy, and asthma worsens perimenstrually in 30–40% of females. Puberty also marks the point in which women develop higher adiposity and a greater ratio of leptin to adiponectin, adipokines implicated in asthma. These hormonal changes, together with differences in airway size (i.e., dysanapsis [34]), contribute to the higher asthma prevalence in women. Clinically, women have more frequent and severe asthma symptoms, poorer quality of life, greater healthcare utilization, greater likelihood of hospitalization, and a higher mortality rate (35). The Severe Asthma Research Program showed that asthma is worse in boys than in girls and in women than in men. Androgens are generally associated with higher lung function in asthma; in a large Norwegian population study, lower FEV1 was associated with lower testosterone (36). Similar findings were observed in a large Australian cohort (37). Inhaled dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) improves asthma symptoms (38). Testosterone can promote airway smooth muscle relaxation. DHEA inhibits human airway smooth muscle and fibroblast proliferation, and is a bronchodilator in guinea pigs (39). In the Severe Asthma Research Program cohort, endocrine substudies revealed differences in levels of DHEA and testosterone associated with the severe asthma phenotype. Surprisingly, both males and females with severe asthma improve in adolescence, but asthma severity increases among women in adulthood. These facts underscore the need to better understand asthma in females, taking into account not only the cellular and tissue-specific alterations, but also the interplay of the complex hormonal milieu and the impact of sex/gender (40).

CF

CF is an autosomal recessive disease that results in progressive airway obstruction and is characterized by chronic inflammation and infection of the lungs. Although equally prevalent in males and females, females exhibit a decreased life span due to complications of more severe lung disease. The United States CF Foundation patient registry showed a sex disparity with regard to median life expectancy, which was found to be nearly 3 years shorter in females (41). Females with CF after puberty also have a higher rate of pulmonary exacerbations (42). Furthermore, Pseudomonas aeruginosa is acquired by females with CF earlier in life, and is associated with a more rapid decline in lung function (43). Interestingly, although females with CF receive lung transplantation at a younger age than males, the post-transplantation survival is equal between sexes regardless of the sex of the donor lung (44). Discrepancies in adherence, access to care, size of the airways, and activity or exercise levels may account for some of the differences. Existing data also implicate sex hormone–mediated effects on CF lung disease. One hypothesis is that 17β-estradiol contributes to worse female outcomes through modulation of bacterial morphology, airway epithelial ion channels, inflammation, and neutrophil functions. 17β-estradiol induces a mucoid conversion of P. aeruginosa in vitro, and higher levels of 17β-estradiol are associated with increased exacerbations in CF (15). 17β-estradiol affects uridine triphosphate–induced chloride secretion on airway epithelium, resulting in a further decreased air surface liquid layer in females (45). 17β-Estradiol induces marked impairment in P. aeruginosa–killing capacity by neutrophils, correlating with an exaggerated inflammatory response (46). The effects of other sex hormones, including progestin and androgen, have not been thoroughly evaluated in CF. These data show that CF may provide a model disease to understand differences in male and female outcomes in a lung disease. The robust national registry supported by the CF Foundation can track the influence of sex hormones across the lifespan, and a large subset of lung transplant data allows for analysis of the impact of transplant sex mismatch.

COPD

COPD is a complex condition, characterized by progressive and largely irreversible airflow limitation (47). Although COPD affects both men and women, COPD prevalence is increasing more rapidly in women, particularly in younger women (48). In the United States, COPD-related hospitalizations and deaths in women now also surpass those in men (48). Women also predominate the roughly 25% of nonsmokers with COPD (49). Sex-specific susceptibility to COPD is poorly understood; however, published data suggest that women are more susceptible to tobacco smoke (48). Women with COPD also face challenges related to their interface with the healthcare system. Women are more likely to be misdiagnosed (50), and survey data also suggest that women are more likely to perceive a delay in diagnosis, attributing it to lack of availability of providers and poor insurance (51). Although individuals with COPD tend to have lower socioeconomic status than those without COPD, income for women with COPD tends to be even lower than that for men. It is not known exactly what impact this has on the ability to obtain appropriate care and other clinical outcomes. Multiple studies outside of COPD demonstrate that women in general are less likely to be adherent to medication, which could also impact disease presentation and management (52). Although socioeconomic factors certainly could influence adherence, differences appear to persist even after adjusting for socioeconomic factors (53).

Women report more dyspnea than men despite similar lung function testing and fewer pack years of smoking (54). Factors that may contribute include greater prevalence of anxiety and depression and increased frequency of COPD exacerbations in women (54, 55). Differences for COPD risk and manifestations are likely multifactorial: smaller lung size in women, estrogen impacts on xenobiotic metabolism of cigarette smoke, and environmental exposures may also contribute. In addition, the perimenopausal period represents a time of significant lung function decline in women. Molecular analyses suggest sex differences in inflammatory burden. Sex-specific genetic and epigenetic associations, gene-by-smoking interactions, and X chromosome associations all contribute to the differential impact in women. These findings present an opportunity for the development of sex-specific therapeutics.

Multiple studies suggest that it is more difficult for women to quit smoking, but data from the Lung Health Study also suggest that smoking cessation results in greater lung function improvement for women (56). Additional data from the Lung Health Study also suggest greater FEV1 response to inhaled ipratropium for women, possibly due to greater M3 relative to M2 receptor expression in women (57), and a pooled analysis of indacaterol/glycopyrronium studies reported greater quality-of-life improvements in women (58). Taken together, the compendium of evidence suggests that gender-specific approaches to COPD are imperative. As gender is clearly multidimensional, systems-based analytic approaches may also allow us to refine early diagnosis, therapeutics, and primary prevention to account for these differences (59).

Pulmonary Fibrosis

Interstitial lung diseases are a heterogeneous group of disorders that are increasing in prevalence. The most common of these diseases, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), displays evidence of sexual dimorphism (60). Men are affected by IPF more than women, and female sex is predictive of better outcomes in IPF, including outcomes with surgical lung biopsy, lung transplantation over the age of 65 years, and overall survival (6163). However, women are more burdened by the symptoms of IPF compared with men, and have worse health-related quality of life (64). There have been a few animal models of pulmonary fibrosis that have sought to understand this sexual dimorphism, mostly pointing toward the adverse effect of testosterone (65). However, confirmatory studies in humans are absent. Interestingly, in one population-based case–control study, the adverse effect of smoking on development of severe pulmonary fibrosis was amplified by male gender (66). The other main group of ILDs that display sexual dimorphism in regard to prevalence and natural history are the autoimmune-related interstitial lung diseases. Young women are most commonly affected by this condition, yet men who get this disease generally have a worse natural history compared with women (67).

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis

Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a destructive, progressive lung disease that can lead to respiratory failure in young women. LAM is caused by inactivating mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) genes, TSC1 and TSC2, leading to activation of mTORC1 (68). For reasons that are incompletely understood, but possibly associated with estrogen pathways, LAM affects women almost exclusively, with one of the strongest gender predispositions of all human diseases, except for diseases of the genital organs (69, 70). LAM progresses more rapidly in premenopausal women, further supporting a key role of hormonal factors. It is believed that LAM cells originate outside the lungs, although the precise site of origin is not established; the uterus, pericytes, and neural crest are candidates. Both cell-autonomous effects of hormones on cell proliferation and metabolism, and non–cell-autonomous effects on lymphangiogenesis and the destruction of lung parenchyma are likely to contribute to LAM pathogenesis. Recent data show that targeting estrogen receptors may be efficacious in the treatment of LAM (71).

Pulmonary Hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), a progressive cardiopulmonary disease that involves remodeling and vasoconstriction of vessels in the lung, is a sexually dimorphic disease more common in women (72). Despite female preponderance of disease development, female patients with PAH exhibit better survival than males (73, 74). This puzzling observation has been termed the “estrogen paradox” of PAH. An additional estrogen paradox in PAH research centers on the fact that estrogens have been shown to be protective in several animal models of PAH, an observation that is opposed to the clinical finding of female susceptibility to disease development (72). On the other hand, animal studies exist in which estrogens (in particular, 16α-hydroxyestrone) have been linked to disease development (72). The reasons for the discrepancy are unclear, but it is likely that differences in experimental models used, differences in estrogen delivery, and/or differences in the age of experimental animals contribute to these findings. The underlying etiology of PAH/pulmonary hypertension (PH), the presence of genetic alterations (e.g., mutations in the BMPR2 gene) and the stage of the disease (early vs. late) may determine whether estrogens are beneficial or harmful in PAH. In humans with established PAH, it is clear that sex affects success of some PAH-directed therapies, in addition to survival (75, 76). A fairly uniform body of evidence suggests that 17β-estradiol has important direct and indirect effects on right ventricular (RV) function, which allow for better RV adaptation to the PAH-induced increase in RV afterload (72). The etiology of the observed sex-based difference in treatment responses is presently unknown.

Sleep-disordered Breathing

Sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) is a serious medical condition characterized by recurrent episodes of airway closure and reopening during sleep, typically resulting in intermittent hypoxia, elevated sympathetic tone, oxidative stress, as well as fragmented and poor sleep quality (77). Sleep apnea is associated with an array of disease risks and outcomes common in women, including hypertension, myocardial infarction, heart failure, stroke, diabetes, cancer, depression, dementia, and quality-of-life measures (77). Women tend to report different sleep apnea symptoms than men, more commonly noting insomnia, fatigue, and/or depressive symptoms, rather than the more traditional symptoms of chronic snoring and gasping for air during sleep (78). Sleep questionnaires are not routinely designed and validated taking sex differences in SDB clinical presentation into consideration. Women are less likely than men to seek medical attention for concerns about SDB, and medical professionals less likely to recognize women’s symptoms of SDB, leaving the large majority of women with SDB undiagnosed and untreated (78, 79). There is a critical need to improve the identification of patient-reported symptoms and physiological risk factors of SDB in women to reduce the number of undiagnosed cases.

The severity of SDB generally differs in women compared with men, including a lower apnea–hypopnea index, shorter duration of individual apnea/hypopnea events, less oxygen desaturation, and greater occurrence of airflow limitation accompanied by microarousals from sleep (79). Although sleep apnea is overall less prevalent in women, susceptibility increases with overweight/obesity, and during particular life stages, including pregnancy and menopause (78). Research is needed to more completely understand mechanisms underlying sex differences in the etiology of SDB, including upper airway anatomy, neuromuscular function, sex hormone effects on ventilatory control, and genetic susceptibility. For example, sex-specific differences have been identified in the sleep-state–dependent hypoxic ventilatory response (80). RAI1 and obstructive sleep apnea–related quantitative trait locus in men, but not women, suggest that different biologic pathways may be involved in the etiology of SDB in men compared with women (81).

Although epidemiologic findings point to middle-aged men as most vulnerable to sleep apnea–related mortality and coronary heart disease, recent findings point to an array of SDB-associated cardiometabolic risks in women (79), with even greater susceptibility to elevated hs-troponin levels, increased left ventricular mass, incident heart failure, impaired endothelial function, and brain white matter loss (79, 8284). Emerging experimental intermittent hypoxia models support a link between estradiol and SDB-triggered cardiopulmonary dysfunction (85). In addition, associations of SDB with cardiovascular and metabolic outcomes in pregnancy, such as pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes, have been consistently described (86, 87), both conditions anticipating cardiovascular and metabolic disease later in life. Maternal SDB is linked to adverse neonatal outcomes that are associated with long-term morbidity in the offspring, such as preterm birth and possibly growth restriction (86). The effect of SDB exposure (e.g., oxidative stress, inflammation, sympathetic drive) on mechanisms of placental function and in utero development are not well understood. A better understanding of SDB-triggered mechanisms of pathobiology in women is needed to identify intermediate markers and therapeutic targets to mitigate SDB risk to women’s health. SDB is frequently comorbid with insomnia, depression, fatigue, asthma, and chronic pain, and may contribute to the etiology, severity, and the ability to effectively treat these conditions (78, 79). In summary, SDB is a risk factor for many conditions affecting women, and needs to be considered as an important variable in research studies, and evaluated as a key factor in the health of women.

One of the most important issues on which biomedical researchers and social scientists can collaborate is defining the mechanisms by which the environment modifies the phenotype, central to which is the interplay between sex and gender. This report highlights variations in disease prevalence, presentation, and progression that may be mediated by biological or social factors, or both. Personalized medicine will not advance without inclusion of the roles of sex/gender in biology and pathobiology (88). A key goal of the workshop was to develop a list of future recommendations to advance our understanding of the roles of sex and gender in sleep and lung diseases, as outlined in Table 1. Although multiple recommendations were developed, top priorities that could be implemented within the next few years include, first, the need for guidelines standardizing reporting of sex for cellular and animal models. Second, the participants recommend that multidisciplinary platforms, particularly including endocrinologists, be developed to encourage broader understanding regarding the role of sex steroids in the mechanisms of health and disease. The workshop itself brought together individuals with a wide variety of research focus and expertise. These types of collaborative efforts will be crucial to expanding our understanding the role of sex and gender. A third recommendation is that clinical trials report sex-stratified analyses when possible to allow for future meta-analyses, which would be fairly easy to implement. Fourth, we must leverage new scientific advancements, including gene editing and epigenetic modifications. We now know that genetic expression is moderated through epigenetics, not confined to the methylation of DNA only. Some examples of epigenetic phenomena/action include X chromosome inactivation, sex-specific gene expression in tissues during development, the creation of the sex-specific setting for disease later in life, and the establishment of the machinery for the heredity of epigenetic modifications. Societal trends, where chromosomal and hormonal sex are mismatched, may also represent an opportunity to clarify the role of sex versus gender in health and disease. Finally, we must enhance the training for future researchers in big data methods that accommodate systems biology and network modeling of sex and gender and their impact on sleep and lung disease.

Table 1. Workshop Recommendations

Key recommendations:
 
• Establish guidelines/standardization encompassing sex for reporting of cellular and animal models for in vitro experiments
• Develop multidisciplinary platforms, with the inclusion of endocrinologists, for understanding sex steroid expression and signaling in both basic and clinical research
• Encourage the reporting of sex-stratified analyses when possible (as supplemental tables), to allow future meta-analyses of sex differences
• Train pulmonary researchers in big data methods that accommodate systems biology and network modeling of sex and gender and their impact on lung diseases and sleep disorders
 
Additional recommendations:
 
 Basic research
  • Include female animals and take into account the estrous cycle of the female mice in all modeling of lung/sleep disorders
  • Microbiome studies should incorporate sex as a variable and address causal pathways by which sex/gender influences the structure and function of the microbiome, including metabolomics and transcriptomics
  • Develop a multi-institutional “biobank” specific to exploration of women’s lung and sleep health and promote sex-specific analysis of genome-wide association studies in various populations
 
 Clinical research
  • Perform preclinical and clinical trials to determine how hormonally based therapies can be used to benefit women with lung diseases and sleep disorders
  • Understand the impact of gender on symptoms of disease and therapeutic choices
  • Understand the impact of sex and gender on side-effect sensitivities to therapies, including pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic (e.g., oxygen, pulmonary rehabilitation) options, and drug metabolism
  • Study the effects of modifying factors, such as age, menopausal state, and nutrition, on sex hormone signaling in pulmonary diseases and sleep disorders
  • Clarify how gender disparities in comorbidities of lung diseases/sleep disorders may impact disease progression and prognosis
  • Clarify the impact of hormone contraceptive therapy and hormone replacement therapy on lung diseases/sleep disorders
  • Study in detail sex hormones, ratios, and metabolites other than estrogens
  • Study of how sex/gender may mechanistically alter drug responses
 
 Training
  • Train pulmonary care providers in the biological, environmental, and psychosocial aspects of gender as it relates to lung disease/sleep disorders
  • Train pulmonary care providers about sex differences in lung biology and pathobiology/sleep disorders, and their manifestations across the life course, including susceptibility, presentation, and severity of disease
  • Train pulmonary care providers in the chromosomal and endocrinological differences that may drive health effects in lung diseases/sleep disorders

Additional Participants in the Joint NHLBI–Office of Research on Women’s Health–Office of Rare Diseases Research Workshop:

Krithika Lingappan, Baylor College of Medicine; Patricia Silveyra, Pennsylvania State University; Joe Zein, Cleveland Clinic; Lisa Begg, Office of Research on Women’s Health, NIH–Office of the Director; Elisabet Caler, NHLBI; Sandra Colombini-Hatch, NHLBI; Michelle M. Freemer, NHLBI; Patricia Noel, NHLBI; Lisa Postow, NHLBI; John Sheridan, NHLBI; Michael Twery, NHLBI; Neil Aggarwal, NHLBI; and Lisa Viviano, NHLBI.

1. Mauvais-Jarvis F, Arnold AP, Reue K. A guide for the design of pre-clinical studies on sex differences in metabolism. Cell Metab 2017;25:12161230.
2. Seaborn T, Simard M, Provost PR, Piedboeuf B, Tremblay Y. Sex hormone metabolism in lung development and maturation. Trends Endocrinol Metab 2010;21:729738.
3. Sathish V, Martin YN, Prakash YS. Sex steroid signaling: implications for lung diseases. Pharmacol Ther 2015;150:94108.
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Fact sheets: diseases and death. 2018 Apr 2 [accessed 2018 Apr 6]. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/index.htm.
5. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The health consequences of smoking—50 years of progress: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2014.
6. Westling E, Andrews JA, Hampson SE, Peterson M. Pubertal timing and substance use: the effects of gender, parental monitoring and deviant peers. J Adolesc Health 2008;42:555-563.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2012.
8. Peck JD, Peck BM, Skaggs VJ, Fukushima M, Kaplan HB. Socio-environmental factors associated with pubertal development in female adolescents: the role of prepubertal tobacco and alcohol use. J Adolesc Health 2011;48:241-246.
9. Davis EM, Peck JD, Peck BM, Kaplan HB. Associations between early alcohol and tobacco use and prolonged time to puberty in boys. Child Care Health Dev 2015;41:459466.
10. Gottlieb S, Zeller M. A nicotine-focused framework for public health. N Engl J Med 2017;377:11111114.
11. Hastings MH, Reddy AB, Maywood ES. A clockwork web: circadian timing in brain and periphery, in health and disease. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003;4:649661.
12. Duffy JF, Cain SW, Chang AM, Phillips AJ, Münch MY, Gronfier C, et al. Sex difference in the near-24-hour intrinsic period of the human circadian timing system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:1560215608.
13. Santhi N, Lazar AS, McCabe PJ, Lo JC, Groeger JA, Dijk DJ. Sex differences in the circadian regulation of sleep and waking cognition in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016;113:E2730E2739.
14. Zhang R, Lahens NF, Ballance HI, Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB. A circadian gene expression atlas in mammals: implications for biology and medicine. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014;111:1621916224.
15. Chotirmall SH, Smith SG, Gunaratnam C, Cosgrove S, Dimitrov BD, O’Neill SJ, et al. Effect of estrogen on Pseudomonas mucoidy and exacerbations in cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012;366:19781986.
16. Roggenbuck M, Anderson D, Barfod KK, Feelisch M, Geldenhuys S, Sørensen SJ, et al. Vitamin D and allergic airway disease shape the murine lung microbiome in a sex-specific manner. Respir Res 2016;17:116.
17. Mercer PF, Abbott-Banner K, Adcock IM, Knowles RG. Translational models of lung disease. Clin Sci (Lond) 2015;128:235256.
18. Takeda M, Tanabe M, Ito W, Ueki S, Konnno Y, Chihara M, et al. Gender difference in allergic airway remodelling and immunoglobulin production in mouse model of asthma. Respirology 2013;18:797806.
19. Stevenson CS, Birrell MA. Moving towards a new generation of animal models for asthma and COPD with improved clinical relevance. Pharmacol Ther 2011;130:93105.
20. Zein JG, Erzurum SC. Asthma is different in women. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2015;15:28.
21. Ray A, Raundhal M, Oriss TB, Ray P, Wenzel SE. Current concepts of severe asthma. J Clin Invest 2016;126:23942403.
22. Shapiro SD. Animal models for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: age of klotho and Marlboro mice. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2000;22:47.
23. Churg A, Sin DD, Wright JL. Everything prevents emphysema: are animal models of cigarette smoke–induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease any use? Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2011;45:11111115.
24. Tam A, Bates JH, Churg A, Wright JL, Man SF, Sin DD. Sex-related differences in pulmonary function following 6 months of cigarette exposure: implications for sexual dimorphism in mild COPD. PLoS One 2016;11:e0164835.
25. Tam A, Churg A, Wright JL, Zhou S, Kirby M, Coxson HO, et al. Sex differences in airway remodeling in a mouse model of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:825834.
26. March TH, Wilder JA, Esparza DC, Cossey PY, Blair LF, Herrera LK, et al. Modulators of cigarette smoke–induced pulmonary emphysema in A/J mice. Toxicol Sci 2006;92:545559.
27. Awji EG, Seagrave JC, Tesfaigzi Y. Correlation of cigarette smoke–induced pulmonary inflammation and emphysema in C3H and C57Bl/6 mice. Toxicol Sci 2015;147:7583.
28. de Souza Santos R, Frank AP, Clegg DJ. The impact of sex and sex hormones on cell function. Steroids 2017;128:7274.
29. Shah K, McCormack CE, Bradbury NA. Do you know the sex of your cells? Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2014;306:C3C18.
30. Kaltofen T, Haase M, Thome UH, Laube M. Male sex is associated with a reduced alveolar epithelial sodium transport. PLoS One 2015;10:e0136178.
31. Oliver JR, Kushwah R, Wu J, Cutz E, Yeger H, Waddell TK, et al. Gender differences in pulmonary regenerative response to naphthalene-induced bronchiolar epithelial cell injury. Cell Prolif 2009;42:672687.
32. Pavord ID, Beasley R, Agusti A, Anderson GP, Bel E, Brusselle G, et al. After asthma: redefining airways diseases. Lancet 2018;391:350400.
33. Salam MT, Wenten M, Gilliland FD. Endogenous and exogenous sex steroid hormones and asthma and wheeze in young women. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;117:10011007.
34. Thompson BR. Dysanapsis—once believed to be a physiological curiosity—is now clinically important. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2017;195:277278.
35. Sinclair AH, Tolsma DD. Gender differences in asthma experience and disease care in a managed care organization. J Asthma 2006;43:363367.
36. Svartberg J, Schirmer H, Medbø A, Melbye H, Aasebø U. Reduced pulmonary function is associated with lower levels of endogenous total and free testosterone: the Tromsø study. Eur J Epidemiol 2007;22:107112.
37. Mohan SS, Knuiman MW, Divitini ML, James AL, Musk AW, Handelsman DJ, et al. Higher serum testosterone and dihydrotestosterone, but not oestradiol, are independently associated with favourable indices of lung function in community-dwelling men. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2015;83:268276.
38. Wenzel SE, Robinson CB, Leonard JM, Panettieri RA Jr. Nebulized dehydroepiandrosterone-3-sulfate improves asthma control in the moderate-to-severe asthma results of a 6-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Allergy Asthma Proc 2010;31:461471.
39. Espinoza J, Montaño LM, Perusquía M. Nongenomic bronchodilating action elicited by dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in a guinea pig asthma model. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 2013;138:174182.
40. Cephus JY, Stier MT, Fuseini H, Yung JA, Toki S, Bloodworth MH, et al. Testosterone attenuates group 2 innate lymphoid cell–mediated airway inflammation. Cell Reports 2017;21:24872499.
41. Harness-Brumley CL, Elliott AC, Rosenbluth DB, Raghavan D, Jain R. Gender differences in outcomes of patients with cystic fibrosis. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014;23:10121020.
42. Sutton S, Rosenbluth D, Raghavan D, Zheng J, Jain R. Effects of puberty on cystic fibrosis related pulmonary exacerbations in women versus men. Pediatr Pulmonol 2014;49:2835.
43. Demko CA, Byard PJ, Davis PB. Gender differences in cystic fibrosis: Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:10411049.
44. Raghavan D, Gao A, Ahn C, Kaza V, Finklea J, Torres F, et al. Lung transplantation and gender effects on survival of recipients with cystic fibrosis. J Heart Lung Transplant 2016;35:14871496.
45. Coakley RD, Sun H, Clunes LA, Rasmussen JE, Stackhouse JR, Okada SF, et al. 17beta-estradiol inhibits Ca2+-dependent homeostasis of airway surface liquid volume in human cystic fibrosis airway epithelia. J Clin Invest 2008;118:40254035.
46. Abid S, Xie S, Bose M, Shaul PW, Terada LS, Brody SL, et al. 17β-estradiol dysregulates innate immune responses to Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection and is modulated by estrogen receptor antagonism. Infect Immun 2017;85:e00422-17.
47. Vestbo J, Hurd SS, Agustí AG, Jones PW, Vogelmeier C, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:347365.
48. Jenkins CR, Chapman KR, Donohue JF, Roche N, Tsiligianni I, Han MK. Improving the management of COPD in women. Chest 2017;151:686696.
49. Birring SS, Brightling CE, Bradding P, Entwisle JJ, Vara DD, Grigg J, et al. Clinical, radiologic, and induced sputum features of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in nonsmokers: a descriptive study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:10781083.
50. Chapman KR, Tashkin DP, Pye DJ. Gender bias in the diagnosis of COPD. Chest 2001;119:16911695.
51. Martinez CH, Raparla S, Plauschinat CA, Giardino ND, Rogers B, Beresford J, et al. Gender differences in symptoms and care delivery for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2012;21:12671274.
52. Chen SL, Lee WL, Liang T, Liao IC. Factors associated with gender differences in medication adherence: a longitudinal study. J Adv Nurs 2014;70:20312040.
53. Thunander Sundbom L, Bingefors K. Women and men report different behaviours in, and reasons for medication non-adherence: a nationwide Swedish survey. Pharm Pract (Granada) 2012;10:207221.
54. Di Marco F, Verga M, Reggente M, Maria Casanova F, Santus P, Blasi F, et al. Anxiety and depression in COPD patients: the roles of gender and disease severity. Respir Med 2006;100:17671774.
55. Celli B, Vestbo J, Jenkins CR, Jones PW, Ferguson GT, Calverley PM, et al.; Investigators of the TORCH Study. Sex differences in mortality and clinical expressions of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the TORCH experience. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:317322.
56. Connett JE, Murray RP, Buist AS, Wise RA, Bailey WC, Lindgren PG, et al.; Lung Health Study Research Group. Changes in smoking status affect women more than men: results of the Lung Health Study. Am J Epidemiol 2003;157:973979.
57. Li X, Obeidat M, Zhou G, Leung JM, Tashkin D, Wise R, et al. Responsiveness to ipratropium bromide in male and female patients with mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. EBioMedicine 2017;19:139145.
58. Tsiligianni I, Mezzi K, Fucile S, Kostikas K, Shen S, Banerji D, et al. Response to indacaterol/glycopyrronium (IND/GLY) by sex in patients with COPD: a pooled analysis from the IGNITE Program. COPD 2017;14:375381.
59. Agusti A, Sobradillo P, Celli B. Addressing the complexity of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: from phenotypes and biomarkers to scale-free networks, systems biology, and P4 medicine. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;183:11291137.
60. Raghu G, Weycker D, Edelsberg J, Bradford WZ, Oster G. Incidence and prevalence of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:810816.
61. Hutchinson JP, Fogarty AW, McKeever TM, Hubbard RB. In-hospital mortality after surgical lung biopsy for interstitial lung disease in the United States: 2000 to 2011. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016;193:11611167.
62. Sheikh SI, Hayes D Jr, Kirkby SE, Tobias JD, Tumin D. Age-dependent gender disparities in post lung transplant survival among patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Thorac Surg 2017;103:441446.
63. Han MK, Murray S, Fell CD, Flaherty KR, Toews GB, Myers J, et al. Sex differences in physiological progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2008;31:11831188.
64. Han MK, Swigris J, Liu L, Bartholmai B, Murray S, Giardino N, et al. Gender influences health-related quality of life in IPF. Respir Med 2010;104:724730.
65. Voltz JW, Card JW, Carey MA, Degraff LM, Ferguson CD, Flake GP, et al. Male sex hormones exacerbate lung function impairment after bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2008;39:4552.
66. Ekström M, Gustafson T, Boman K, Nilsson K, Tornling G, Murgia N, et al. Effects of smoking, gender and occupational exposure on the risk of severe pulmonary fibrosis: a population-based case–control study. BMJ Open 2014;4:e004018.
67. Suzuki A, Kondoh Y, Fischer A. Recent advances in connective tissue disease related interstitial lung disease. Expert Rev Respir Med 2017;11:591603.
68. Carsillo T, Astrinidis A, Henske EP. Mutations in the tuberous sclerosis complex gene TSC2 are a cause of sporadic pulmonary lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000;97:60856090.
69. Yu JJ, Robb VA, Morrison TA, Ariazi EA, Karbowniczek M, Astrinidis A, et al. Estrogen promotes the survival and pulmonary metastasis of tuberin-null cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:26352640.
70. Gu X, Yu JJ, Ilter D, Blenis N, Henske EP, Blenis J. Integration of mTOR and estrogen-ERK2 signaling in lymphangioleiomyomatosis pathogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2013;110:1496014965.
71. Li C, Zhou X, Sun Y, Zhang E, Mancini JD, Parkhitko A, et al. Faslodex inhibits estradiol-induced extracellular matrix dynamics and lung metastasis in a model of lymphangioleiomyomatosis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2013;49:135142.
72. Lahm T, Tuder RM, Petrache I. Progress in solving the sex hormone paradox in pulmonary hypertension. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2014;307:L7L26.
73. Jacobs W, van de Veerdonk MC, Trip P, de Man F, Heymans MW, Marcus JT, et al. The right ventricle explains sex differences in survival in idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2014;145:12301236.
74. Olsson KM, Delcroix M, Ghofrani HA, Tiede H, Huscher D, Speich R, et al. Anticoagulation and survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: results from the Comparative, Prospective Registry of Newly Initiated Therapies for Pulmonary Hypertension (COMPERA). Circulation 2014;129:5765.
75. Gabler NB, French B, Strom BL, Liu Z, Palevsky HI, Taichman DB, et al. Race and sex differences in response to endothelin receptor antagonists for pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2012;141:2026.
76. Mathai SC, Hassoun PM, Puhan MA, Zhou Y, Wise RA. Sex differences in response to tadalafil in pulmonary arterial hypertension. Chest 2015;147:188197.
77. Javaheri S, Barbe F, Campos-Rodriguez F, Dempsey JA, Khayat R, Javaheri S, et al. Sleep apnea: types, mechanisms, and clinical cardiovascular consequences. J Am Coll Cardiol 2017;69:841858.
78. Mallampalli MP, Carter CL. Exploring sex and gender differences in sleep health: a Society for Women’s Health Research report. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2014;23:553562.
79. Wimms A, Woehrle H, Ketheeswaran S, Ramanan D, Armitstead J. Obstructive sleep apnea in women: specific issues and interventions. Biomed Res Int 2016;2016:1764837.
80. Alif SM, Dharmage SC, Benke G, Dennekamp M, Burgess JA, Perret JL, et al. Occupational exposure to pesticides are associated with fixed airflow obstruction in middle-age. Thorax 2017;72:990997.
81. Chen H, Cade BE, Gleason KJ, Bjonnes AC, Stilp AM, Sofer T, et al. Multiethnic meta-analysis identifies RAI1 as a possible obstructive sleep apnea–related quantitative trait locus in men. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2018;58:391401.
82. Macey PM, Kumar R, Yan-Go FL, Woo MA, Harper RM. Sex differences in white matter alterations accompanying obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep (Basel) 2012;35:16031613.
83. Querejeta Roca G, Redline S, Punjabi N, Claggett B, Ballantyne CM, Solomon SD, et al. Sleep apnea is associated with subclinical myocardial injury in the community: the ARIC-SHHS study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:14601465.
84. Faulx MD, Larkin EK, Hoit BD, Aylor JE, Wright AT, Redline S. Sex influences endothelial function in sleep-disordered breathing. Sleep 2004;27:11131120.
85. Laouafa S, Ribon-Demars A, Marcouiller F, Roussel D, Bairam A, Pialoux V, et al. Estradiol protects against cardiorespiratory dysfunctions and oxidative stress in intermittent hypoxia. Sleep (Basel) 2017;40:zsx104.
86. Bin YS, Cistulli PA, Ford JB. Population-based study of sleep apnea in pregnancy and maternal and infant outcomes. J Clin Sleep Med 2016;12:871877.
87. Bourjeily G, Danilack VA, Bublitz MH, Lipkind H, Muri J, Caldwell D, et al. Obstructive sleep apnea in pregnancy is associated with adverse maternal outcomes: a national cohort. Sleep Med 2017;38:5057.
88. Legato MJ, Johnson PA, Manson JE. Consideration of sex differences in medicine to improve health care and patient outcomes. JAMA 2016;316:18651866.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Xenia Tigno, Ph.D., M.S., Division of Lung Diseases, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Two Rockledge Centre, Suite 10042, 6701 Rockledge Drive, MSC 7952, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail: .

Supported by the NIH; the Joint NHLBI–Office of Research on Women’s Health–Office of Rare Diseases Research Workshop was made possible through cofunding contributions from the three institutes/offices. Attendance at the workshop was free of charge to all participants. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the NIH, or the NHLBI.

Author Contributions: All authors contributed to the content and writing of this manuscript; X.T. and A.P. wrote the first draft of this manuscript; all authors meet the definition of an author as stated by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors, and all have seen and approved the final manuscript.

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201801-0168WS on May 10, 2018

Author disclosures are available with the text of this article at www.atsjournals.org.

Related

No related items
Comments Post a Comment




New User Registration

Not Yet Registered?
Benefits of Registration Include:
 •  A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)
 •  The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level
 •  The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
198
7

Click to see any corrections or updates and to confirm this is the authentic version of record