American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

In the last 30 years, we have learned much about the molecular, cellular, and physiological mechanisms that regulate the resolution of pulmonary edema in both the normal and the injured lung. Although the physiological mechanisms responsible for the formation of pulmonary edema were identified by 1980, the mechanisms that explain the resolution of pulmonary edema were not well understood at that time. However, in the 1980s several investigators provided novel evidence that the primary mechanism for removal of alveolar edema fluid depended on active ion transport across the alveolar epithelium. Sodium enters through apical channels, primarily the epithelial sodium channel, and is pumped into the lung interstitium by basolaterally located Na/K-ATPase, thus creating a local osmotic gradient to reabsorb the water fraction of the edema fluid from the airspaces of the lungs. The resolution of alveolar edema across the normally tight epithelial barrier can be up-regulated by cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP)-dependent mechanisms through adrenergic or dopamine receptor stimulation, and by several cAMP-independent mechanisms, including glucocorticoids, thyroid hormone, dopamine, and growth factors. Whereas resolution of alveolar edema in cardiogenic pulmonary edema can be rapid, the rate of edema resolution in most patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is markedly impaired, a finding that correlates with higher mortality. Several mechanisms impair the resolution of alveolar edema in ARDS, including cell injury from unfavorable ventilator strategies or pathogens, hypoxia, cytokines, and oxidative stress. In patients with severe ARDS, alveolar epithelial cell death is a major mechanism that prevents the resolution of lung edema.

The physiological basis for the formation of pulmonary edema was established by 1980. Cardiogenic pulmonary edema develops because of elevated vascular pressures in the lung (1), hence the term hydrostatic lung edema. Noncardiogenic pulmonary edema, clinically recognized as the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), is primarily the consequence of an increase in lung vascular and epithelial permeability (2). Several experimental studies had reported that the combination of elevated vascular pressure and an increase in lung vascular permeability would increase the accumulation of pulmonary edema (3, 4). And, in fact, elevated lung vascular pressures do coexist with an increase in lung vascular permeability in some clinical conditions that lead to ARDS, including sepsis and major trauma, as demonstrated definitively in a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute–supported multicenter clinical trial (5).

However, the mechanisms responsible for the resolution of pulmonary edema were not well understood until research in the 1980s identified the primary mechanism responsible for the resolution of alveolar edema—active ion transport across the alveolar epithelium. This discovery led to a more comprehensive understanding of the molecular, cellular, and physiological basis for the resolution of pulmonary edema over the last 30 years. Considerable progress has been made in understanding the absorption of perinatal lung fluid by active ion transport, though this topic is beyond the scope of this essay (6).

The first section of this essay focuses on the removal of pulmonary edema fluid in the uninjured lung, most relevant to the resolution of hydrostatic or cardiogenic pulmonary edema, with a focus on how the science in this field evolved historically. The second section considers the mechanisms that impair the resolution of lung edema in the presence of acute lung injury or ARDS. The final section briefly considers promising areas for future research.

The resolution of alveolar edema can be appreciated radiographically or histologically, as shown in Figure 1. The scientific challenge was to account for net reabsorption of edema fluid across the alveolar epithelium, normally a tight epithelium that restricts the passive movement of even small solutes (7). Prevailing theories had suggested that reabsorption of alveolar edema fluid might be driven by negative interstitial pressure, protein osmotic pressure differences, or by a transpulmonary airway pressure gradient, but there were no convincing data for these hypotheses. However, in the 1980s, a combination of in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrated that the primary mechanism driving the resolution of alveolar edema was vectorial transport of sodium into the interstitial space, thereby creating an osmotic gradient for absorption of water from the distal airspaces of the lung (7). Several investigators demonstrated that the excess interstitial fluid was cleared by lung lymphatics, and by bulk flow across the low-resistance visceral pleura into the pleural space (1, 8). A negative interstitial pressure gradient, even under conditions of edema, was shown to be the major force for the removal of interstitial edema fluid into lung lymphatics and the mediastinum (9).

In Vivo Studies

The development of a clinically relevant model in sheep to study the resolution of alveolar edema provided new insights into the mechanisms responsible for removal of fluid from the distal air spaces of the lung. After instillation of a known quantity of autologous serum or plasma into the distal airspaces of one lung in anesthetized and ventilated sheep, much of the liquid or water volume was removed rapidly over 4 hours while the instilled protein concentrated in the airspaces to levels above the plasma protein concentration (10). In spontaneously ventilating sheep, 75% of the liquid volume was removed over 24 hours while only 25% of the alveolar protein was cleared from the airspaces (11). In these experiments, alveolar protein concentration increased at 24 hours to 13 g/100 ml while the circulating plasma protein concentration remained at 6 g/100 ml. The alveolar protein osmotic pressure was approximately 40 cm H2O higher than the protein osmotic pressure in the interstitial or vascular spaces of the lung (10, 11), a difference that would be expected to draw fluid into the alveolar compartment, based on the elevated alveolar protein osmotic pressure; nevertheless, net removal of alveolar fluid continued. The term alveolar fluid clearance (AFC) was used to describe this process (11). The removal of all of the instilled fluid from the lung was termed lung liquid clearance, which can be measured by standard gravimetric methods (7, 11). Normally, the rate-limiting step for the resolution of pulmonary edema is the reabsorption of edema fluid across the alveolar epithelial barrier.

Additional in vivo studies performed by several investigators in large and small animal models provided direct evidence that active sodium transport was responsible for the resolution of alveolar edema. The rate of AFC could be reduced by approximately 50% with an apical sodium channel inhibitor (amiloride), or blocked completely in the isolated perfused lung with ouabain, an inhibitor of Na/K-ATPase, or by perfusion at low temperature (1216). Basolaterally localized Na/K-ATPase establishes a transepithelial sodium concentration gradient by extruding sodium out of polarized epithelial cells while sodium enters the apical cell surface through sodium channels. This sodium concentration gradient was thus established as the force that drives the osmotic reabsorption of water from the alveoli into the lung interstitium.

In Vitro and In Situ Studies

In parallel with the in vivo studies and perfused lung experiments, several in vitro studies established that cultured, polarized rat alveolar epithelial type II cells had the capacity to transport sodium from an apical to a basolateral direction. Tight monolayers of cultured type II cells formed domes of fluid, and dome formation was inhibited if sodium was not included in the culture medium or amiloride was added (17, 18). A number of different experimental preparations demonstrated a major role for Na/K-ATPase activity. As a result of Na/K-ATPase activity, the potassium electrochemical potential is larger inside the cell, and potassium efflux is regulated by channels localized to the basolateral membrane (7). In the alveolar epithelium, Na/K-ATPase is a heterodimeric transmembrane protein composed of a catalytic α1 subunit and a regulatory β subunit. These isoforms are needed for functional insertion of Na/K-ATPase in the cell membrane, and several mechanisms can up- or down-regulate the abundance of Na/K-ATPase on the basolateral surface of alveolar epithelial cells as well as pump activity (19). Several investigators contributed to our understanding of this process with Ussing chamber studies to measure short-circuit current and ion flux as well as with patch-clamp studies for both distal airway epithelium and alveolar epithelial cells, including novel in situ lung slice tissue studies (7, 2023).

Epithelial sodium channel.

The molecular basis for most of the apical uptake of sodium in the alveolar epithelium was established when the three subunits of the epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) were cloned (α, β, γ) in 1994 (24). ENaC was found to be expressed throughout the lung epithelium (as well as in the kidneys, large intestine, and other organs). Knockout of the α subunit in mice resulted in persistent lung fluid at birth and death from respiratory failure (24). Interestingly, a case report described a homozygous ENaC-α preterm infant who did not suffer any evidence of respiratory failure (25). Thus, in contrast to mice, clearance of alveolar fluid after birth in humans may not critically depend on ENaC. This report could be explained by a role for the δ ENaC subunit (26) or could be explained by up-regulation of other ENaC subunits, or a greater reliance on non-ENaC sodium channels. Several studies have shown that ENaC is regulated by transcriptional, translational, and posttranslational mechanisms, including trafficking and stability on the apical cell membrane. Also, membrane-bound extracellular serine proteases, termed channel-activating proteases, have been shown to regulate ENaC sodium conductance (27). Some investigators also established a role for other, less well-characterized channels for sodium uptake across alveolar epithelium, including nonselective cation channels, cyclic nucleotide–gated channels, and other selective cation channels (7, 21, 27). Although alveolar epithelial type II cells were initially thought to be the primary cell responsible for vectorial sodium transport, subsequent studies demonstrated that alveolar epithelial type I cells probably play an important role in driving AFC (28). Type I cells have ENaC and other sodium channels on the apical surface and Na/K-ATPase on the basolateral surface, demonstrated by elegant morphological and biophysical methods, including studies in the in situ lung (23, 2931).

Aquaporins.

Although biophysicists had postulated the existence of specific water transcellular channels, the discovery in 1992 of aquaporin-1 opened a new field with identification of large numbers of aquaporins with major relevance to mammalian and plant biology (32). Aquaporin-1 was found to be distributed throughout the lung endothelium, and aquaporin-5 was expressed on the apical surface of alveolar epithelial type I cells. Type I cells were shown to be highly water permeable, primarily because of the existence of aquaporin-5 (33). However, a series of single- and double-knockout studies for aquaporin-1 and -5 in mice indicated that the absence of either or both aquaporins did not alter the rate of alveolar fluid clearance (34, 35). The osmotic clearance of water generated by the ion transport gradient across the alveolar epithelium probably occurs by paracellular pathways, although some water may cross by a transcellular route through aquaporins.

Figure 2A summarizes the pathways and principal transporters responsible for the resolution of alveolar edema in the normal lung under basal conditions.

Alveolar fluid clearance in patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema.

In ventilated patients with cardiogenic pulmonary edema the resolution of alveolar edema could be estimated by measuring sequential concentrations of total protein in undiluted edema fluid samples suctioned from a 14-gauge catheter through the endotracheal tube over 4–12 hours (36, 37). This measurement reflects net clearance of edema fluid, and thus AFC might be reduced because of ongoing alveolar edema formation. Maximal AFC in patients with hydrostatic pulmonary edema was greater than 14%/hour and submaximal clearance was 3–14%/hour (37). The submaximal clearance rate may be explained by persistently elevated lung vascular pressures in some patients, resulting in flooding, although other mechanisms are possible (38). More recent studies in the ex vivo perfused uninjured human lung indicate that basal AFC is approximately 20%/hour (39), a fast rate that helps to explain why cardiogenic pulmonary edema can resolve rapidly in patients once the primary cause has been successfully treated and vascular pressures in the lung microcirculation are normalized.

Regulation of alveolar fluid clearance.

The rate of AFC was shown to be increased by cAMP stimulation (7, 27), an effect that can be explained in part by increased sodium conductance, recruitment of more ENaCs to the apical membrane with more open time, as well as an increase in the enzymatic activity of Na/K-ATPase (7, 27). cAMP stimulation with β-adrenergic agonists accelerated AFC in sheep, dogs, rats, and mice. The potential clinical relevance of this pathway was established by studies in an ex vivo human lung preparation showing that AFC could be markedly increased in human lungs by a β2-adrenergic agonist and inhibited by amiloride or ouabain (13). In addition, experimental studies demonstrated that an increase in endogenous plasma levels of epinephrine from shock of any cause induces an acute increase in the rate of AFC that can be inhibited by β-adrenergic blockade, indicating that the up-regulation of AFC can be driven by pathological conditions that may predispose to pulmonary edema, including sepsis (27, 40).

It has been difficult to determine how chloride transfers across the alveolar epithelium. Chloride transport is required to maintain electrical neutrality to match cationic sodium clearance from the airspaces. Some in vitro evidence indicated that chloride may move through paracellular and transcellular pathways (41, 42), and more recent data suggested that chloride might be regulated by claudins, in particular claudin-4, by conferring relative chloride selectivity to the paracellular pathway (43). In the presence of cAMP stimulation, cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) opens on the apical membrane of alveolar epithelial type I and II cells, providing a permissive effect for up-regulated AFC. ΔF508 mice that lack function CFTR did not increase AFC with exogenous or endogenous β-agonist stimulation (44). Other studies indicated that CFTR plays an important role in cAMP-accelerated chloride clearance, in parallel with increased transport of sodium through ENaC and other apical sodium channels (27, 42).

Several investigators reported that β-adrenergic receptor–independent factors, including dopamine, corticosteroids, thyroid hormone, reactive oxygen species, and keratinocyte growth factor, and even leukotriene D4, tumor necrosis factor-α, membrane-bound extracellular serine proteases, and nucleotides, can increase AFC by transcriptional and translational pathways (7, 22, 27, 45). Also, purinergic agonists have been shown to regulate ENaC as well as a large number of intracellular signaling pathways (22).

Figure 2B summarizes several of the pathways that increase the rate of AFC.

The net effect of all of these pathways in the setting of pulmonary edema in patients has not been clearly defined. For example, there is evidence that cAMP agonist stimulation with an inhaled β2-adrenergic agonist (salmeterol) can prevent high-altitude pulmonary edema (46) and that inhaled β2-agonist therapy can reduce lung water and improve oxygen saturation in patients with probable postoperative hydrostatic pulmonary edema (47). However, as is discussed in the next section, cAMP stimulation does not enhance the resolution of alveolar edema in patients with lung injury from ARDS.

Unresolved issues.

Although much has been learned, there are several unanswered questions. Is there an important contribution of distal airways to AFC that has been underestimated (48)? Under some pathological conditions, could secretion of Na+ or Cl contribute to alveolar edema (49)? Also, we do not adequately understand how the alveolar liquid subphase is maintained in the normal lung, although one study measured a fluid pH of 6.9, suggesting that it is actively regulated (50).

Clinical studies established that the capacity to remove pulmonary edema is impaired in most patients with ARDS (51). Impaired AFC correlated with higher mortality (51), and furthermore the severity of shock in sepsis-induced ARDS has been reported to be associated with lower rates of AFC (52). The mechanisms responsible for impaired AFC have been studied in a variety of clinically relevant experimental models of ARDS (19, 27).

Moderate hypoxemia reduced AFC by 50% (53) by decreasing apical sodium uptake by transcriptional effects and by impaired trafficking of ENaC. Hypoxia inhibited the function of Na/K-ATPase on alveolar epithelial cells, in part by triggering endocytosis through reactive oxygen species and phosphorylation of the α1 subunit (19, 54). Restoration of normoxia rapidly reversed the depressant effects of hypoxia in rats (53). Thus, the simple administration of supplemental oxygen to patients with pulmonary edema may in itself enhance the resolution of alveolar edema. There is also new evidence that hypercapnia can impair alveolar fluid clearance (55, 56).

Experimental work indicated that high tidal volume and elevated airway pressures injure the alveolar epithelium, markedly reducing AFC in the injured lung, in part by inducing cell death, inflammation, and disrupting cell junctions. The success of lung-protective ventilator strategies in reducing mortality in ARDS is likely explained in part by the preservation or restoration of more normal AFC in the injured lung, a finding that was demonstrated in a clinically relevant rat model of acid-induced lung injury (57).

Several cytokines present in the airspaces of patients with ARDS, including IL-1β, IL-8, and transforming growth factor-β, were shown to decrease vectorial fluid transport across alveolar epithelium by reducing the expression and function of Na/K-ATPase and ENaC (5862). Viral infection with influenza was found to impair the function of ENaC. Some investigators reported that bacterial and viral products directly injured alveolar epithelial cells, either through their effects on neutrophils, platelets, and monocytes, or by direct toxic injury to epithelial cells, potentially through oxidant, proteolytic, and other pathways (6365). There is also evidence that alveolar epithelial cell injury and dysfunction may in part result from mitochondrial injury, resulting in low intracellular ATP levels that can impair surfactant secretion and perhaps vectorial ion and fluid transport (66).

If lung vascular hydrostatic pressures are elevated in the setting of persistent endothelial or epithelial injury, then ongoing alveolar flooding could impair net removal of edema fluid from the alveoli. This concept may help explain why a conservative fluid strategy resulted in more ventilator-free days in patients with ARDS in a large randomized clinical trial (5), although there is experimental and clinical evidence that lower vascular pressures may also reduce proinflammatory pathways (67, 68).

The failure of either inhaled or intravenous β2-adrenergic agonists to improve survival in phase 3 clinical trials (69, 70) could be explained by several of the mechanisms, including the loss of an intact alveolar epithelial barrier, because apoptosis and necrosis play an important role in lung injury in ARDS (71, 72). There is also evidence that IL-8 can impair the stimulatory effect of β2 agonists on AFC (62). Inhaled β2 agonist also did not increase alveolar fluid clearance or oxygenation in a randomized trial in brain-dead subjects who were potential lung transplant donors if their lung function had improved (73).

Figure 3 summarizes these pathways to explain impaired AFC in ARDS. It is likely that several of these pathways simultaneously reduce the resolution of alveolar edema in most patients with ARDS.

The challenge is to accelerate the resolution of alveolar edema in patients with ARDS, which also includes enhancing the clearance of pathogens, cell debris, fibrin, and excess matrix (74). A critical barrier to restoring normal AFC is the lack of functional alveolar epithelium, probably in large part from death of type I and type II cells, perhaps explaining why aerosolized and intravenous β-adrenergic agonists did not improve outcomes in patients with ARDS (69, 70). Thus, we need to understand more completely the mechanisms of lung epithelial cell death and obtain more insights into how the injured alveolar epithelium is regenerated. Some progress has been made in mouse models indicating the likely contribution of several progenitor cell populations to alveolar repair (7578). However, we do not know how to accelerate this process of reestablishing an alveolar epithelium that will function normally for three essential properties of normal alveolar epithelium: (1) a tight barrier that guards against alveolar flooding, (2) surfactant secretion, and (3) vectorial ion and fluid transport to facilitate the resolution of alveolar edema. It is likely that repair of the nearby injured microvascular endothelium in ARDS is also required for normal AFC to be established across the alveolar epithelium.

Current ARDS trials are testing therapies that have the potential to enhance the resolution of alveolar edema. Cell-based therapy with mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells is being tested in phase 1 and 2 trials in adults with ARDS. Mesenchymal stem cells are attractive because they have multiple beneficial properties, including inhibition of apoptosis, reduction of inflammation, and enhancement of AFC in the presence of endotoxin and bacterial–induced injury (7981), and the capacity to deliver mitochondria to injured alveolar epithelium that can restore depleted ATP levels to a normal level (66). Although inhaled nitric oxide did not reduce mortality in ARDS, there is interest in testing safe levels of inhaled carbon monoxide because of promising data in preclinical models (82). Antiplatelet therapies are attractive, in part because of their capacity to reduce lung injury and also to increase pro-resolving lipid mediators (83). Improved methods to decrease ventilator-associated lung injury with prone positioning (84) or new methods to identify optimal levels of positive end-expiratory pressure may enhance AFC (85) and the resolution of alveolar edema by reducing epithelial injury and allowing more rapid restoration of a normal alveolar epithelium.

The author appreciates the helpful critical review of this manuscript by Drs. Lorrraine Ware, James Frank, Jeff Gotts, and Kathleen D. Liu and also the assistance of Andrew Manies in assembling the manuscript. Special thanks also to Diana Lim for outstanding work in creating Figures 2 and 3 for this essay. The author also acknowledges deep appreciation to the late Dr. Norman Staub for his role as an inspiring mentor and investigator for the author and many others in the CVRI and UCSF.

1. Staub NC. The pathogenesis of pulmonary edema. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1980;23:5380.
2. Staub NC. Pulmonary edema due to increased microvascular permeability. Annu Rev Med 1981;32:291312.
3. Prewitt RM, McCarthy J, Wood LD. Treatment of acute low pressure pulmonary edema in dogs: relative effects of hydrostatic and oncotic pressure, nitroprusside, and positive end-expiratory pressure. J Clin Invest 1981;67:409418.
4. Staub NC. Pulmonary edema: physiologic approaches to management. Chest 1978;74:559564.
5. Wiedemann HP, Wheeler AP, Bernard GR, Thompson BT, Hayden D, deBoisblanc B, Connors AF Jr, Hite RD, Harabin AL. Comparison of two fluid-management strategies in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med 2006;354:25642575.
6. Pitkanen OM, O’Brodovich HM. Significance of ion transport during lung development and in respiratory disease of the newborn. Ann Med 1998;30:134142.
7. Matthay MA, Folkesson HG, Clerici C. Lung epithelial fluid transport and the resolution of pulmonary edema. Physiol Rev 2002;82:569600.
8. Wiener-Kronish JP, Broaddus VC, Albertine KH, Gropper MA, Matthay MA, Staub NC. Relationship of pleural effusions to increased permeability pulmonary edema in anesthetized sheep. J Clin Invest 1988;82:14221429.
9. Bhattacharya J, Gropper MA, Staub NC. Interstitial fluid pressure gradient measured by micropuncture in excised dog lung. J Appl Physiol 1984;56:271277.
10. Matthay MA, Landolt CC, Staub NC. Differential liquid and protein clearance from the alveoli of anesthetized sheep. J Appl Physiol 1982;53:96104.
11. Matthay MA, Berthiaume Y, Staub NC. Long-term clearance of liquid and protein from the lungs of unanesthetized sheep. J Appl Physiol 1985;59:928934.
12. Rutschman DH, Olivera W, Sznajder JI. Active transport and passive liquid movement in isolated perfused rat lungs. J Appl Physiol 1985;1993:15741580.
13. Sakuma T, Okaniwa G, Nakada T, Nishimura T, Fujimura S, Matthay MA. Alveolar fluid clearance in the resected human lung. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;150:305310.
14. Serikov VB, Grady M, Matthay MA. Effect of temperature on alveolar liquid and protein clearance in an in situ perfused goat lung. J Appl Physiol 1993;75:940947.
15. Basset G, Crone C, Saumon G. Significance of active ion transport in transalveolar water absorption: a study on isolated rat lung. J Physiol 1987;384:311324.
16. Basset G, Crone C, Saumon G. Fluid absorption by rat lung in situ: pathways for sodium entry in the luminal membrane of alveolar epithelium. J Physiol 1987;384:325345.
17. Goodman BE, Crandall ED. Dome formation in primary cultured monolayers of alveolar epithelial cells. Am J Physiol 1982;243:C96C100.
18. Mason RJ, Williams MC, Widdicombe JH, Sanders MJ, Misfeldt DS, Berry LC Jr. Transepithelial transport by pulmonary alveolar type II cells in primary culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982;79:60336037.
19. Vadasz I, Raviv S, Sznajder JI. Alveolar epithelium and Na,K-ATPase in acute lung injury. Intensive Care Med 2007;33:12431251.
20. Ballard ST, Schepens SM, Falcone JC, Meininger GA, Taylor AE. Regional bioelectric properties of porcine airway epithelium. J Appl Physiol 1985;1992:20212027.
21. Matalon S, O’Brodovich H. Sodium channels in alveolar epithelial cells: molecular characterization, biophysical properties, and physiological significance. Annu Rev Physiol 1999;61:627661.
22. Eaton DC, Helms MN, Koval M, Bao HF, Jain L. The contribution of epithelial sodium channels to alveolar function in health and disease. Annu Rev Physiol 2009;71:403423.
23. Helms MN, Jain L, Self JL, Eaton DC. Redox regulation of epithelial sodium channels examined in alveolar type 1 and 2 cells patch-clamped in lung slice tissue. J Biol Chem 2008;283:2287522883.
24. Canessa CM, Schild L, Buell G, Thorens B, Gautschi I, Horisberger JD, Rossier BC. Amiloride-sensitive epithelial Na+ channel is made of three homologous subunits. Nature 1994;367:463467.
25. Huppmann S, Lankes E, Schnabel D, Buhrer C. Unimpaired postnatal respiratory adaptation in a preterm human infant with a homozygous ENaC-α unit loss-of-function mutation. J Perinatol 2011;31:802803.
26. Ji HL, Zhao RZ, Chen ZX, Shetty S, Idell S, Matalon S. δ ENaC: a novel divergent amiloride-inhibitable sodium channel. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2012;303:L1013L1026.
27. Folkesson HG, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial ion and fluid transport: recent progress. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2006;35:1019.
28. Johnson MD, Widdicombe JH, Allen L, Barbry P, Dobbs LG. Alveolar epithelial type I cells contain transport proteins and transport sodium, supporting an active role for type I cells in regulation of lung liquid homeostasis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002;99:19661971.
29. Bourke S, Mason HS, Borok Z, Kim KJ, Crandall ED, Kemp PJ. Development of a lung slice preparation for recording ion channel activity in alveolar epithelial type I cells. Respir Res 2005;6:40.
30. Ridge KM, Olivera WG, Saldias F, Azzam Z, Horowitz S, Rutschman DH, Dumasius V, Factor P, Sznajder JI. Alveolar type 1 cells express the α2 Na,K-ATPase, which contributes to lung liquid clearance. Circ Res 2003;92:453460.
31. Johnson MD, Bao HF, Helms MN, Chen XJ, Tigue Z, Jain L, Dobbs LG, Eaton DC. Functional ion channels in pulmonary alveolar type I cells support a role for type I cells in lung ion transport. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006;103:49644969.
32. Nielsen S, Smith BL, Christensen EI, Knepper MA, Agre P. CHIP28 water channels are localized in constitutively water-permeable segments of the nephron. J Cell Biol 1993;120:371383.
33. Dobbs LG, Gonzalez R, Matthay MA, Carter EP, Allen L, Verkman AS. Highly water-permeable type I alveolar epithelial cells confer high water permeability between the airspace and vasculature in rat lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998;95:29912996.
34. Ma T, Fukuda N, Song Y, Matthay MA, Verkman AS. Lung fluid transport in aquaporin-5 knockout mice. J Clin Invest 2000;105:93100.
35. Song Y, Fukuda N, Bai C, Ma T, Matthay MA, Verkman AS. Role of aquaporins in alveolar fluid clearance in neonatal and adult lung, and in oedema formation following acute lung injury: studies in transgenic aquaporin null mice. J Physiol 2000;525:771779.
36. Matthay MA, Wiener-Kronish JP. Intact epithelial barrier function is critical for the resolution of alveolar edema in humans. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;142:12501257.
37. Verghese GM, Ware LB, Matthay BA, Matthay MA. Alveolar epithelial fluid transport and the resolution of clinically severe hydrostatic pulmonary edema. J Appl Physiol 1985;1999:13011312.
38. Solymosi EA, Kaestle-Gembardt SM, Vadasz I, Wang L, Neye N, Chupin CJ, Rozowsky S, Ruehl R, Tabuchi A, Schulz H, et al. Chloride transport–driven alveolar fluid secretion is a major contributor to cardiogenic lung edema. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013;110:E2308E2316.
39. Frank JA, Briot R, Lee JW, Ishizaka A, Uchida T, Matthay MA. Physiological and biochemical markers of alveolar epithelial barrier dysfunction in perfused human lungs. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2007;293:L52L59.
40. Pittet JF, Wiener-Kronish JP, McElroy MC, Folkesson HG, Matthay MA. Stimulation of lung epithelial liquid clearance by endogenous release of catecholamines in septic shock in anesthetized rats. J Clin Invest 1994;94:663671.
41. Kim KJ, Cheek JM, Crandall ED. Contribution of active Na+ and Cl fluxes to net ion transport by alveolar epithelium. Respir Physiol 1991;85:245256.
42. Ingbar DH, Bhargava M, O’Grady SM. Mechanisms of alveolar epithelial chloride absorption. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2009;297:L813L815.
43. Frank JA. Claudins and alveolar epithelial barrier function in the lung. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2012;1257:175183.
44. Fang X, Fukuda N, Barbry P, Sartori C, Verkman AS, Matthay MA. Novel role for CFTR in fluid absorption from the distal airspaces of the lung. J Gen Physiol 2002;119:199207.
45. Sloniewsky DE, Ridge KM, Adir Y, Fries FP, Briva A, Sznajder JI, Sporn PH. Leukotriene D4 activates alveolar epithelial Na,K-ATPase and increases alveolar fluid clearance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:407412.
46. Sartori C, Allemann Y, Duplain H, Lepori M, Egli M, Lipp E, Hutter D, Turini P, Hugli O, Cook S, et al. Salmeterol for the prevention of high-altitude pulmonary edema. N Engl J Med 2002;346:16311636.
47. Licker M, Tschopp JM, Robert J, Frey JG, Diaper J, Ellenberger C. Aerosolized salbutamol accelerates the resolution of pulmonary edema after lung resection. Chest 2008;133:845852.
48. Lindert J, Perlman CE, Parthasarathi K, Bhattacharya J. Chloride-dependent secretion of alveolar wall liquid determined by optical-sectioning microscopy. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2007;36:688696.
49. Bove PF, Grubb BR, Okada SF, Ribeiro CM, Rogers TD, Randell SH, O’Neal WK, Boucher RC. Human alveolar type II cells secrete and absorb liquid in response to local nucleotide signaling. J Biol Chem 2010;285:3493934949.
50. Nielson DW, Goerke J, Clements JA. Alveolar subphase pH in the lungs of anesthetized rabbits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981;78:71197123.
51. Ware LB, Matthay MA. Alveolar fluid clearance is impaired in the majority of patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2001;163:13761383.
52. Zeyed YF, Bastarache JA, Matthay MA, Ware LB. The severity of shock is associated with impaired rates of net alveolar fluid clearance in clinical acute lung injury. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2012;303:L550L555.
53. Vivona ML, Matthay M, Chabaud MB, Friedlander G, Clerici C. Hypoxia reduces alveolar epithelial sodium and fluid transport in rats: reversal by β-adrenergic agonist treatment. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2001;25:554561.
54. Dada LA, Sznajder JI. Hypoxic inhibition of alveolar fluid reabsorption. Adv Exp Med Biol 2007;618:159168.
55. Briva A, Vadasz I, Lecuona E, Welch LC, Chen J, Dada LA, Trejo HE, Dumasius V, Azzam ZS, Myrianthefs PM, et al. High CO2 levels impair alveolar epithelial function independently of pH. PLoS One 2007;2:e1238.
56. Cummins EP, Selfridge AC, Sporn PH, Sznajder JI, Taylor CT. Carbon dioxide–sensing in organisms and its implications for human disease. Cell Mol Life Sci 2014;71:831845.
57. Frank JA, Gutierrez JA, Jones KD, Allen L, Dobbs L, Matthay MA. Low tidal volume reduces epithelial and endothelial injury in acid-injured rat lungs. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:242249.
58. Frank J, Roux J, Kawakatsu H, Su G, Dagenais A, Berthiaume Y, Howard M, Canessa CM, Fang X, Sheppard D, et al. Transforming growth factor-β1 decreases expression of the epithelial sodium channel αENaC and alveolar epithelial vectorial sodium and fluid transport via an ERK1/2-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem 2003;278:4393943950.
59. Lee JW, Fang X, Dolganov G, Fremont RD, Bastarache JA, Ware LB, Matthay MA. Acute lung injury edema fluid decreases net fluid transport across human alveolar epithelial type II cells. J Biol Chem 2007;282:2410924119.
60. Pittet JF, Griffiths MJ, Geiser T, Kaminski N, Dalton SL, Huang X, Brown LA, Gotwals PJ, Koteliansky VE, Matthay MA, et al. TGF-β is a critical mediator of acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 2001;107:15371544.
61. Peters DM, Vadasz I, Wujak L, Wygrecka M, Olschewski A, Becker C, Herold S, Papp R, Mayer K, Rummel S, et al. TGF-β directs trafficking of the epithelial sodium channel ENaC which has implications for ion and fluid transport in acute lung injury. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111:E374E383.
62. Roux J, McNicholas CM, Carles M, Goolaerts A, Houseman BT, Dickinson DA, Iles KE, Ware LB, Matthay MA, Pittet JF. IL-8 inhibits cAMP-stimulated alveolar epithelial fluid transport via a GRK2/PI3K-dependent mechanism. FASEB J 2013;27:10951106.
63. Hickman-Davis JM, McNicholas-Bevensee C, Davis IC, Ma HP, Davis GC, Bosworth CA, Matalon S. Reactive species mediate inhibition of alveolar type II sodium transport during mycoplasma infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;173:334344.
64. Chen XJ, Seth S, Yue G, Kamat P, Compans RW, Guidot D, Brown LA, Eaton DC, Jain L. Influenza virus inhibits ENaC and lung fluid clearance. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2004;287:L366L373.
65. Song W, Liu G, Bosworth CA, Walker JR, Megaw GA, Lazrak A, Abraham E, Sullender WM, Matalon S. Respiratory syncytial virus inhibits lung epithelial Na+ channels by up-regulating inducible nitric-oxide synthase. J Biol Chem 2009;284:72947306.
66. Islam MN, Das SR, Emin MT, Wei M, Sun L, Westphalen K, Rowlands DJ, Quadri SK, Bhattacharya S, Bhattacharya J. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat Med 2012;18:759765.
67. Kuebler WM, Ying X, Singh B, Issekutz AC, Bhattacharya J. Pressure is proinflammatory in lung venular capillaries. J Clin Invest 1999;104:495502.
68. Calfee CS, Gallagher D, Abbott J, Thompson BT, Matthay MA; NHLBI ARDS Network. Plasma angiopoietin-2 in clinical acute lung injury: prognostic and pathogenetic significance. Crit Care Med 2012;40:17311737.
69. Matthay MA, Brower RG, Carson S, Douglas IS, Eisner M, Hite D, Holets S, Kallet RH, Liu KD, MacIntyre N, et al.; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) Clinical Trials Network. Randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial of an aerosolized β-agonist for treatment of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011;184:561568.
70. Gao Smith F, Perkins GD, Gates S, Young D, McAuley DF, Tunnicliffe W, Khan Z, Lamb SE. Effect of intravenous β-2 agonist treatment on clinical outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (BALTI-2): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;379:229235.
71. Albertine KH, Soulier MF, Wang Z, Ishizaka A, Hashimoto S, Zimmerman GA, Matthay MA, Ware LB. Fas and Fas ligand are up-regulated in pulmonary edema fluid and lung tissue of patients with acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Pathol 2002;161:17831796.
72. Ware LB, Matthay MA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2000;342:13341349.
73. Ware LB, Landeck M, Koyama T, Zhao Z, Singer J, Kern R, Neidlinger N, Nguyen J, Johnson E, Janz DR, et al.; California Transplant Donor Network. A randomized trial of the effects of nebulized albuterol on pulmonary edema in brain-dead organ donors. Am J Transplant 2014;14:621628.
74. Matthay MA, Ware L, Zimmerman GA. The acute respiratory distress syndrome. J Clin Invest 2012;122:27312740.
75. Gotts JE, Matthay MA. Mesenchymal stem cells and the stem cell niche: a new chapter. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2012;302:L1147L1149.
76. Barkauskas CE, Cronce MJ, Rackley CR, Bowie EJ, Keene DR, Stripp BR, Randell SH, Noble PW, Hogan BL. Type 2 alveolar cells are stem cells in adult lung. J Clin Invest 2013;123:30253036.
77. Lee JH, Bhang DH, Beede A, Huang TL, Stripp BR, Bloch KD, Wagers AJ, Tseng YH, Ryeom S, Kim CF. Lung stem cell differentiation in mice directed by endothelial cells via a BMP4–NFATc1–thrombospondin-1 axis. Cell 2014;156:440455.
78. Matthay MA, Anversa P, Bhattacharya J, Burnett BK, Chapman HA, Hare JM, Hei DJ, Hoffman AM, Kourembanas S, McKenna DH, et al. Cell therapy for lung diseases: report from an NIH-NHLBI workshop, November 13–14, 2012. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;188:370375.
79. Lee JW, Fang X, Krasnodembskaya A, Howard JP, Matthay MA. Concise review: mesenchymal stem cells for acute lung injury: role of paracrine soluble factors. Stem Cells 2011;29:913919.
80. Lee JW, Fang X, Gupta N, Serikov V, Matthay MA. Allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of E. coli endotoxin–induced acute lung injury in the ex vivo perfused human lung. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2009;106:1635716362.
81. Lee JW, Krasnodembskaya A, McKenna DH, Song Y, Abbott J, Matthay MA. Therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cells in ex vivo human lungs injured with live bacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013;187:751760.
82. Ryter SW, Choi AM. Heme oxygenase-1/carbon monoxide: novel therapeutic strategies in critical care medicine. Curr Drug Targets 2010;11:14851494.
83. Looney MR, Nguyen JX, Hu Y, Van Ziffle JA, Lowell CA, Matthay MA. Platelet depletion and aspirin treatment protect mice in a two-event model of transfusion-related acute lung injury. J Clin Invest 2009;119:34503461.
84. Guerin C, Reignier J, Richard JC, Beuret P, Gacouin A, Boulain T, Mercier E, Badet M, Mercat A, Baudin O, et al. Prone positioning in severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2013;368:21592168.
85. Constantin JM, Cayot-Constantin S, Roszyk L, Futier E, Sapin V, Dastugue B, Bazin JE, Rouby JJ. Response to recruitment maneuver influences net alveolar fluid clearance in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology 2007;106:944951.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Michael A. Matthay, M.D., 505 Parnassus Avenue, M-917, Box 0624, San Francisco, CA 94143-0624. E-mail:

Author disclosures are available with the text of this occasional essay at www.atsjournals.org.

Related

No related items
Comments Post a Comment




New User Registration

Not Yet Registered?
Benefits of Registration Include:
 •  A Unique User Profile that will allow you to manage your current subscriptions (including online access)
 •  The ability to create favorites lists down to the article level
 •  The ability to customize email alerts to receive specific notifications about the topics you care most about and special offers
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
189
11

Click to see any corrections or updates and to confirm this is the authentic version of record