American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Rationale: Survivors of acute lung injury (ALI) frequently have substantial depressive symptoms and physical impairment, but the longitudinal epidemiology of these conditions remains unclear.

Objectives: To evaluate the 2-year incidence and duration of depressive symptoms and physical impairment after ALI, as well as risk factors for these conditions.

Methods: This prospective, longitudinal cohort study recruited patients from 13 intensive care units (ICUs) in four hospitals, with follow-up 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after ALI. The outcomes were Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale depression score greater than or equal to 8 (“depressive symptoms”) in patients without a history of depression before ALI, and two or more dependencies in instrumental activities of daily living (“impaired physical function”) in patients without baseline impairment.

Measurements and Main Results: During 2-year follow-up of 186 ALI survivors, the cumulative incidences of depressive symptoms and impaired physical function were 40 and 66%, respectively, with greatest incidence by 3-month follow-up; modal durations were greater than 21 months for each outcome. Risk factors for incident depressive symptoms were education 12 years or less, baseline disability or unemployment, higher baseline medical comorbidity, and lower blood glucose in the ICU. Risk factors for incident impaired physical function were longer ICU stay and prior depressive symptoms.

Conclusions: Incident depressive symptoms and impaired physical function are common and long-lasting during the first 2 years after ALI. Interventions targeting potentially modifiable risk factors (e.g., substantial depressive symptoms in early recovery) should be evaluated to improve ALI survivors’ long-term outcomes.

Scientific Knowledge on the Subject

Survivors of acute lung injury (ALI) frequently have substantial depressive symptoms and impaired physical function after hospital discharge, but the longitudinal epidemiology and risk factors for these conditions have not been fully evaluated.

What This Study Adds to the Field

This prospective, longitudinal cohort study shows that, in the first 2 years after ALI, new-onset depressive symptoms and new-onset physical impairment are common and long lasting (cumulative incidences were 40 and 66%, respectively, and modal durations were greater than 21 months for each outcome). Depressive symptoms were a significant and potentially modifiable risk factor for later-onset physical impairment.

Survivors of acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome (ALI) and other critical illnesses frequently have substantial depressive symptoms and impaired physical functioning, with associated decrements in quality of life (19). At present, there are gaps in knowledge regarding the incidence and duration of these conditions in ALI survivors, as well as their risk factors.

Our objective was to longitudinally examine the incidence and duration of depressive symptoms and impaired physical functioning in the first 2 years after ALI. We also sought to determine risk factors for each of these conditions, to help inform future prevention and treatment efforts. Some of the results of this study have been reported previously in the form of an abstract (10).

Study Population

Mechanically ventilated patients with ALI (11) were enrolled consecutively in a prospective cohort study involving 13 intensive care units (ICUs) at four hospitals in Baltimore, Maryland, between October 2004 and October 2007 (12). To avoid inclusion of patients with primary neurologic disease or head trauma, neurologic specialty ICUs at the participating hospitals were excluded. Key exclusion criteria were (1) preexisting illness with a life expectancy of less than 6 months, (2) preexisting cognitive impairment or communication/language barriers, (3) no fixed address, (4) transfer to a study site ICU with preexisting ALI of greater than 24 hours’ duration, (5) more than 5 days of mechanical ventilation before ALI, and (6) a physician order for no escalation of ICU care (e.g., no vasopressors or hemodialysis) at the time of study eligibility.

Informed consent was obtained after patients regained capacity, typically around the time of hospital discharge (13). Follow-up occurred at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after the onset of ALI. The institutional review boards of Johns Hopkins University and all participating study sites approved this research.

Definition of Depressive Symptoms Incidence, Remission, and Recurrence

To ascertain patients’ baseline mood status, we reviewed the medical records related to the ALI hospitalization for evidence of any preexisting “depression” diagnosis. At each follow-up time point, depressive symptoms were measured using the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale (14, 15). “Incident depressive symptoms” were defined as having an HAD depression score greater than or equal to 8 at any follow-up, in the absence of baseline depression. The HAD depression subscale was designed to evaluate depressive states in patients with general medical illnesses, as it primarily measures anhedonia rather than neurovegetative symptoms (e.g., diminished energy) that could be symptomatic of general medical conditions rather than depressive states. The HAD depression subscale has been validated as a screening tool for depressive states in many medical and general population settings, with an optimal threshold of 8 or more in most studies, corresponding to a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 80% across studies (15); the criterion standards for these studies were depression-related psychiatric diagnoses—which varied by study but included major depressive disorder and/or dysthymia or adjustment disorder—measured using structured or semistructured (clinical) diagnostic interviews (15).

We were also interested in the course of incident depressive symptoms after ALI. We defined remission as having an HAD depression score less than 8 at any follow-up time point after incident depressive symptoms, along with a statistically reliable decrease in score using the Reliable Change Index (RCI) (16). To calculate the RCI, we used standard deviation (SD) and test–retest reliability estimates from previous studies (17, 18). To have a statistically significant change, patients had to have a difference in scores of greater than or equal to 4; this threshold is substantially larger than the minimal clinically important difference (1.5 points) established for this measure (19). We defined recurrence as having an HAD depression score greater than or equal to 8 at any follow-up after remission, along with an increase in scores of greater than or equal to 4.

Definition of Impaired Physical Function Incidence, Remission, and Recurrence

We chose dependencies in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) (20) as our measure of physical impairment, as IADL dependencies are reflective of more subtle dysfunction than ADL dependencies (20), and the former are less prone to ceiling effects in predicting the ability to live independently (21). IADL dependencies (i.e., difficulty with using the telephone, shopping, preparing meals, doing housework, laundering clothes, transportation, taking medications, and managing money) are strongly associated with other physical performance measures, such as gait velocity, balance function, grip strength, and chair stand time (22). In the current study, numbers of IADL dependencies were strongly related to 36-item Short-Form health survey (SF-36v2) (23) Physical Component scores at each follow-up, with Spearman rank correlations ranging between −0.64 and −0.71. We chose a threshold of two or more IADL dependencies, as used elsewhere (24, 25), to help ensure that the measured dysfunction would be meaningful to patients and caregivers. Patients were considered to have “incident impaired physical function” if they did not have baseline (pre-ALI) impairment (assessed retrospectively around hospital discharge, using the IADL instrument) but had two or more dependencies at any follow-up. Patients self-reported their IADL dependencies in 86% of the baseline assessments and in 96% of the follow-up assessments; their closest available proxies reported on the remainder.

We were also interested in the course of incident impaired physical function after ALI. We defined remission as having fewer than two IADL dependencies at any follow-up time point after incident impaired physical function, along with a statistically reliable decrease in number of dependencies. To calculate the RCI, we used SD and test–retest reliability estimates from previous studies (26, 27). To have a statistically significant change, patients had to have a difference in number of dependencies of two or more. We defined recurrence as having two or more IADL dependencies at any follow-up after remission, along with an increase in number of dependencies of two or more.

Risk Factors for Incident Depressive Symptoms and Incident Impaired Physical Function

We conducted separate analyses of risk factors for new-onset depressive symptoms and new-onset physical impairment after ALI. Potential risk factors were selected in part based on findings from previous studies of ALI survivors (28, 29); some predictors of depressive symptoms at 3- and 6-month follow-ups were reported previously (30, 31).

Baseline characteristics included age, sex, race, education, employment status (disabled or unemployed vs. employed), body mass index, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (32). Critical illness/ICU variables included organ failure (maximum Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA] [33] score), low blood glucose (operationalized using the mean daily minimum value), medication doses (mean daily benzodiazepine [midazolam-equivalent] and corticosteroid [prednisone-equivalent] doses), surgical (vs. medical) ICU admission, length of stay, delirium (proportion of ICU study days with a positive Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU [34] assessment), and deep sedation (proportion of ICU study days with Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale [35] score of −4 or −5). We also examined prior depressive symptoms as a risk factor for new-onset physical impairment and prior impaired physical function as a risk factor for new-onset depressive symptoms.

Statistical Methods

Cumulative incidence functions for depressive symptoms and impaired physical function were generated separately using the Kaplan-Meier estimator. These discrete-time survival data were analyzed using logistic regression models, which allowed for a flexible baseline hazard function (with indicator variables for the 6-, 12-, and 24-mo follow-ups) to examine associations with potential risk factors (36). Multivariable models included all potential risk factors that had a bivariate association (P ≤ 0.10) with the outcome variable.

Our primary analyses involved assumptions about depressive symptoms or impaired physical function status when data were missing. When HAD depression scores were missing, but SF-36v2 (23) Mental Health domain scores were available, depressive symptoms were deemed present if the Mental Health domain score was less than or equal to 69. This threshold was derived from a receiver operating characteristic analysis with the HAD depression score threshold (≥ 8) as the criterion variable, using data from the current study (area under the curve = 0.84). Using this procedure, we replaced 4, 3, 4, and 1 missing HAD depression scores at 3-, 6-, 12-, and 24-mo follow-ups, respectively. Otherwise, when patients had missing values for particular follow-ups, we assumed that their prior depressive symptoms or physical function status remained constant. Thus, our incidence estimates may be conservative, because we assume that subjects remain free of depressive symptoms or impaired physical function for longer than may be the case. To evaluate the potential for bias with this missing data strategy, we performed complete case analyses (i.e., only analyzing data from patients with complete data at all follow-ups) as sensitivity analyses. Results of the complete case analyses were similar to those of the primary analyses; hence, we only present results of the primary analyses. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05 (two-sided). All analyses were performed using R statistical software (37).

Of 520 eligible patients with ALI, 274 (53%) survived their acute hospitalization and were eligible for consent. Additional patients died, declined, or could not be contacted for consent, leaving 196 consenting survivors at 3 months after ALI (Figure 1). Of these 196 participants, 186 (95%) had at least one follow-up visit with complete HAD and IADL data. Thirty-nine of these patients (21%) had baseline (pre-ALI) depression, and 74 (40%) had baseline impaired physical function. The point prevalences of depressive symptoms and impaired physical function at the four follow-up time points ranged from 24 to 32% and 43 to 64%, respectively (Figure 1). At each follow-up, depressive symptoms and impaired physical function were significantly related to each other cross-sectionally (Figure 1).

Onset and Duration of Incident Depressive Symptoms and Incident Impaired Physical Function

During 2-year follow-up after ALI, the cumulative incidence of depressive symptoms in the 147 patients at risk was 40%, and the cumulative incidence of impaired physical function in the 112 patients at risk was 66% (Figure 2). Incidence was highest by the 3-month follow-up and declined thereafter.

The modal durations of incident depressive symptoms and incident impaired physical function were each more than 21 months (the maximum duration possible), with remissions during the follow-up period in 39 and 54%, respectively, of those eligible for remission (i.e., those with incidence before 24-mo follow-up) and recurrences in 20 and 14%, respectively, of those with remissions. Of those with incident depressive symptoms, 69% had depressive symptoms at 24-month follow-up; of those with incident impaired physical function, 58% were impaired at 24-month follow-up.

Figure 3 illustrates individual and mean symptom levels for patients whose incident conditions remitted or did not remit during 2-year follow-up after ALI. In patients whose incident depressive symptoms remitted, the mean HAD depression score remained approximately 5 throughout the follow-up period; this score corresponds to the 75th percentile in a large nonclinical sample of adults (17). In patients whose depressive symptoms did not remit, the mean HAD depression score remained greater than or equal to 10; this score corresponds to the 96th percentile in a large nonclinical sample of adults (17). In patients whose incident impaired physical function remitted, the mean number of IADL dependencies remained approximately 1 throughout the follow-up period. In patients whose impaired physical function did not remit, the mean number of IADL dependencies remained greater than or equal to four.

Risk Factors for Incident Depressive Symptoms and Incident Impaired Physical Function

Table 1 shows the distribution of potential risk factors in the entire sample (n = 186) and in those without baseline depression (n = 147, 79%) or baseline impaired physical function (n = 112, 60%) who were at risk for these incident conditions.

TABLE 1. POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS FOR INCIDENT DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS OR INCIDENT IMPAIRED PHYSICAL FUNCTION IN ACUTE LUNG INJURY SURVIVORS

Incident Depressive Symptoms
Incident Impaired Physical Function
Potential Risk FactorsAll (n = 186)Case (n = 58)Noncase (n = 89)Case (n = 74)Noncase (n = 38)
Baseline factors
 Age, yr, mean (SD)49 (14)50 (13)48 (16)49 (13)46 (12)
 Male105 (56%)30 (52%)56 (63%)41 (55%)20 (53%)
 Nonwhite75 (40%)32 (55%)41 (46%)30 (40%)21 (55%)*
 Education ≤ 12 yr112 (63%)43 (80%)41 (48%)42 (59%)21 (55%)
 Disability or unemployment108 (58%)40 (69%)39 (44%)§39 (53%)13 (34%)
 BMI > 3058 (32%)17 (29%)26 (30%)19 (26%)14 (38%)
 Charlson Comorbidity Index, mean (SD)2.2 (2.7)2.9 (3.0)1.8 (2.4)§2.0 (2.5)1.6 (2.3)
Critical illness/ICU factors
 Maximum daily SOFA score > 1056 (30%)20 (34%)24 (27%)26 (35%)7 (18%)*
 Mean daily minimum glucose < 100 mg/dl72 (39%)31 (53%)31 (35%)30 (40%)10 (26%)*
 Mean daily midazolam equivalent dose > 75 mg39 (21%)13 (22%)16 (18%)11 (15%)11 (29%)*
 Mean daily prednisone equivalent dose ≥ 50 mg53 (29%)15 (26%)27 (31%)23 (31%)8 (21%)
 Surgical ICU admission26 (14%)11 (19%)10 (11%)12 (16%)2 (5%)*
 Length of stay, d, mean (SD)19 (17)17 (12)19.6 (18.6)21.2 (19.6)15.8 (11.5)
 Delirium, proportion of d, mean (SD)64% (33%)61% (35%)60% (33%)60% (34%)68% (34%)
 Deep sedation, proportion of d, mean (SD)32% (25%)31% (27%)30% (24%)32% (24%)36% (25%)
Longitudinal
 Impaired physical function at last follow-up30 (52%)30 (35%)*
 Depressive symptoms at last follow-up19 (26%)4 (10%)

Definition of abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; ICU = intensive care unit; SD = standard deviation; SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

Those at risk for incident depression or incident impaired physical function were those without baseline depression (n = 147) or baseline impaired physical function (n = 112), respectively, before acute lung injury.

* 0.05 < P ≤ 0.1, derived from discrete time survival logistic regression models.

n = 9 with missing education data; n = 2 with missing BMI data; n = 1 with missing prednisone equivalent data; n = 3 with missing baseline physical function data.

P < 0.001, derived from discrete time survival logistic regression models.

§ P < 0.01, derived from discrete time survival logistic regression models.

P < 0.05, derived from discrete time survival logistic regression models.

Potential risk factors that had a bivariate association (P ≤ 0.05) with incident depressive symptoms after ALI were education 12 or fewer years, baseline disability or unemployment, higher baseline medical comorbidity, and lower blood glucose in the ICU (Table 2). In a multivariable model, only education 12 or fewer years was significantly associated with incident depressive symptoms (odds ratio [OR] = 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–6.6).

TABLE 2. ESTIMATED ODDS RATIOS FOR INCIDENT DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS OR INCIDENT IMPAIRED PHYSICAL FUNCTION GIVEN POTENTIAL RISK FACTORS

Incident Depressive Symptoms
Incident Impaired Physical Function
Bivariate
Multivariable
Bivariate
Multivariable
Potential Risk FactorsOR (95% CI)P ValueOR (95% CI)P ValueOR (95% CI)P ValueOR (95% CI)P Value
Baseline factors
 Age (per 10 yr)1.13 (0.93–1.36)0.211.09 (0.86–1.38)0.45
 Male0.70 (0.39–1.24)0.211.11 (0.61–2.00)0.73
 Nonwhite1.43 (0.81–2.54)0.210.56 (0.31–1.02)0.050.65 (0.34–1.23)0.18
 Education ≤ 12 yr3.52 (1.73–7.18)<0.0013.14 (1.49–6.58)0.0021.11 (0.60–2.04)0.74
 Disability or unemployment2.47 (1.34–4.56)0.0031.78 (0.86–3.69)0.111.62 (0.90–2.94)0.10
 BMI > 301.05 (0.56–1.96)0.890.69 (0.36–1.34)0.26
 Charlson Comorbidity Index (per point)1.13 (1.03–1.24)0.0081.10 (0.98–1.23)0.101.07 (0.95–1.22)0.25
Critical illness/ICU factors
 Maximum daily SOFA score > 101.28 (0.70–2.36)0.411.82 (0.95–3.50)0.061.12 (0.53–2.37)0.76
 Mean daily minimum glucose < 100 mg/dl1.91 (1.07–3.40)0.021.42 (0.74–2.70)0.281.71 (0.92–3.19)0.081.59 (0.81–3.12)0.17
 Mean daily midazolam equivalent dose > 75 mg1.29 (0.64–2.58)0.470.51 (0.23–1.10)0.080.52 (0.23–1.19)0.11
 Mean daily prednisone equivalent dose ≥ 50 mg0.81 (0.42–1.55)0.511.48 (0.76–2.86)0.24
 Surgical ICU admission1.53 (0.72–3.23)0.262.51 (0.96–6.51)0.051.63 (0.59–4.54)0.34
 Length of stay (per d)0.99 (0.98–1.01)0.571.03 (1.00–1.05)0.031.02 (0.99–1.05)0.13
 Delirium, proportion of days (per 10%)1.00 (0.92–1.10)0.910.95 (0.87–1.04)0.24
 Deep sedation, proportion of days (per 10%)1.02 (0.91–1.14)0.760.96 (0.85–1.09)0.54
Longitudinal
 Impaired physical function at last follow-up1.68 (0.94–3.00)0.081.29 (0.67–2.47)0.44
 Depressive symptoms at last follow-up2.40 (1.11–5.17)0.022.66 (1.17–6.01)0.02

Definition of abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CI = confidence interval; ICU = intensive care unit; OR = odds ratio; SOFA = Sequential Organ Failure Assessment.

ORs derived from discrete time survival logistic regression models.

Potential risk factors that had a bivariate association (P ≤ 0.05) with incident impaired physical function were longer ICU length of stay and depressive symptoms at last follow-up (Table 2). In a multivariable model (Table 2), only depressive symptoms at last follow-up were significantly associated with incident impaired physical function (OR = 2.7; 95% CI, 1.2–6.0).

In addition to reflecting impaired physical function, IADL dependencies could reflect impaired cognitive function. For example, taking medications and managing money are sometimes referred to as “nonphysical” IADLs (22). To determine whether depression-related cognitive dysfunction could underlie the relationship between depressive symptoms at last follow-up and incident impaired physical function, we repeated the prior analyses to evaluate if depressive symptoms at last follow-up were only associated with individual nonphysical incident IADL dependencies. The number of patients with incident IADL dependencies/number at risk were: using the telephone, 34/175; shopping, 80/133; preparing food, 57/132; housekeeping, 85/121; doing laundry, 67/136; traveling, 73/143; taking medications, 48/159; and managing money, 62/149. Adjusted ORs and 95% CIs relating depressive symptoms at last follow-up to incident IADL dependencies were: using the telephone, 1.7 (0.7–4.1); shopping, 2.1 (1.0–4.2); preparing food, 3.2 (1.5–6.6); housekeeping, 2.0 (1.0–4.0); doing laundry, 2.0 (1.0–3.9); traveling, 1.8 (0.9–3.8); taking medications, 2.2 (1.0–4.7); and managing money, 1.5 (0.8–3.1). Thus, the results did not support the hypothesis that depressive symptoms only precede nonphysical IADL dependencies (taking medications and managing money), because preceding depressive symptoms were significantly associated with incident dependencies in shopping, preparing food, housekeeping, and doing laundry, as well as taking medications; the weakest association was with managing money.

This multisite, prospective longitudinal study of 186 ALI survivors demonstrates that incident depressive symptoms and incident impaired physical function are common and long-lasting during the first 2 years after ALI. Our analyses indicate that depressive symptoms are not only relatively persistent in ALI survivors but also an independent risk factor for subsequent impairment in physical function. Hence, early identification and treatment of depressive states should be evaluated as a potential intervention to minimize the suffering and impairment that affect so many of these patients.

The cumulative 2-year incidences of depressive symptoms and impaired physical function after ALI were high at 40 and 66%, respectively. Incidence was highest by 3-month follow-up, as might be expected after a severe critical illness. However, the presence of additional incident cases throughout the 2-year follow-up period suggests that events after the ALI hospitalization (e.g., further illness and hospitalization, and financial and other stressors [38, 39]) contribute to ongoing morbidity for ALI survivors. Importantly, most survivors with post-ALI incidence of depressive symptoms or impaired physical functioning were affected at the last follow-up. The most common pattern was to have incidence by 3-month follow-up and persistence through the last follow-up. Given that depressive symptoms and impaired physical function are common and persistent/recurrent in ALI survivors, comprehensive and ongoing evaluation, treatment, and rehabilitation of these patients are necessary (40).

The point prevalences of substantial depressive symptoms in the current report (24–32% during the first 2 yr post-ALI) are comparable to those in previous studies of ALI survivors (range 17–43%, median 28% during the first 2 yr post-ALI) (1). These point prevalences are substantially higher than the 8% point prevalence of an HAD depression score greater than or equal to 8 in a large nonclinical sample of adults (17).

We identified several risk factors for incident depressive symptoms in ALI survivors: lower education, baseline disability or unemployment, baseline comorbid medical conditions, and lower blood glucose in the ICU. We previously reported that lower in-ICU blood glucose appeared particularly relevant to depressive symptoms early in the follow-up period (i.e., at 3-mo follow-up) (30, 31). Having 12 or fewer years of education was a particularly strong and independent risk factor for incident depressive symptoms in this study. Lower education and other indicators of low socioeconomic status are well-established risk factors for depressive illness (41).

We also identified two risk factors for incident physical impairment in ALI survivors: longer ICU length of stay and prior depressive symptoms. Having prior depressive symptoms was a particularly strong and independent risk factor for incident physical impairment in this study. Importantly, although a history of depression is often noted in patients admitted to an ICU, antidepressants are often stopped in this setting; starting or restarting antidepressants and/or psychotherapy early during patient recovery might improve long-term physical and psychiatric outcomes in ALI survivors (42).

Several possible mechanisms may explain why depressive symptoms are a risk factor for impaired physical function in ALI survivors. First, depressive symptoms may decrease motivation for, and reward from, physical activities necessary for recovery or maintenance of functioning (43). This is consistent with our clinical experience that depressed patients are more difficult to engage in physical therapy, which is often crucial for recovery of function (28). Second, depressive symptoms can amplify symptoms of general medical illnesses (44, 45), and an increased physical symptom load could negatively affect functioning. Third, depressive symptoms can affect adherence to medication regimens (46), which could worsen the course of general medical illnesses. Fourth, depressive symptoms could affect functioning through direct neurobiologic pathways, including neuroendocrine and inflammatory mechanisms (47). Finally, it is possible that depressive symptoms negatively influence patients’ perceptions of what they are able to do; nevertheless, like others (48), we do not doubt that depression-associated impairments in functioning are real, based on our clinical experience with these patients.

Limitations

There are several potential limitations of this study. First, we measured depressive symptoms using a well-validated self-report questionnaire (15), rather than psychiatric diagnoses using expert clinicians with specialized training to perform semistructured interviews and incorporate informant and medical record data (49). We believe that, given the added burden for participants, the latter method would have pushed the limits of feasibility and resulted in substantially higher losses to follow-up and incomplete data, especially during the first 12 months when patients were still in early recovery and required three follow-up assessments. Obtaining psychiatric diagnoses also would have been logistically difficult, given the need for expert clinicians to be physically present in patients’ homes or long-term care facilities (58% of participants required at least one such visit during 2-yr follow-up).

Second, we used medical records to identify baseline (pre-ALI) depression, likely a relatively specific, but insensitive, method that could lead to an overestimate of the incidence of post-ALI depressive symptoms due to nondetection of baseline depression. On the other hand, chart review may have detected depression that had remitted well before ALI, thus potentially underestimating the incidence of post-ALI depressive symptoms. Such potential biases are generally unavoidable, given the infeasibility of directly assessing patients’ mood status immediately before ALI onset. To examine the validity of our method, we compared retrospectively ascertained pre-ALI SF-36v2 Mental Health domain scores in patients with and without baseline depression identified via their medical records. Pre-ALI Mental Health domain scores were substantially lower in patients with baseline depression (mean = 52, SD = 23) than in patients without baseline depression (mean = 72, SD = 23) (P < 0.001).

Third, we did not account for possible effects of treatment of depression or impaired physical function. Thus, we may have missed instances of depressive symptoms or impaired physical function that occurred and resolved before the first follow-up or in between follow-ups.

Fourth, although we statistically controlled for several potential confounders in our analyses of risk factors, residual confounding could have influenced the associations detected in this study. However, because it is not possible to randomize patients to depressive symptoms, physical impairment, or indeed many of the potential risk factors we examined, observational studies provide essential information regarding likely relationships. Given the findings of the current study, it is important to evaluate interventions for early identification and treatment of depressive states as part of a comprehensive post-ICU rehabilitation program (40), to determine if such an intervention would improve patients’ mood states and physical functioning, as demonstrated previously in populations of elderly depressed persons (48, 50).

Conclusions

Incident depressive symptoms and incident impaired physical function are common and long-lasting during the first 2 years after ALI. Depressive symptoms are an independent risk factor for impaired physical function in this population. Hence, early identification and treatment of depressive states should be evaluated as a potential intervention to improve ALI survivors’ long-term outcomes.

The authors thank all of the patients who participated in the study and the dedicated research staff who assisted with the study, including Dr. Nardos Belayneh, Ms. Rachel Bell, Ms. Kim Boucher, Dr. Sanjay Desai, Ms. Carinda Feild, Ms. Thelma Harrington, Dr. Praveen Kondreddi, Ms. Frances Magliacane, Ms. Stacey Murray, Dr. Kim Nguyen, Dr. Susanne Prassl, Dr. Abdulla Damluji, Ms. Arabela Sampaio, Ms. Kristin Sepulveda, Dr. Shabana Shahid, Dr. Faisal Siddiqi, and Ms. Michelle Silas.

1. Davydow DS, Desai SV, Needham DM, Bienvenu OJ. Psychiatric morbidity in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review. Psychosom Med 2008;70:512519.
2. Davydow DS, Gifford JM, Desai SV, Bienvenu OJ, Needham DM. Depression in general intensive care unit survivors: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:796809.
3. Weinert C, Meller W. Epidemiology of depression and antidepressant therapy after acute respiratory failure. Psychosomatics 2006;47:399407.
4. Herridge MS, Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Matte-Martyn A, Diaz-Granados N, Al-Saidi F, Cooper AB, Guest CB, Mazer CD, Mehta S, et al.. One-year outcomes in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med 2003;348:683693.
5. Hudson LD, Lee CM. Neuromuscular sequelae of critical illness. N Engl J Med 2003;348:745747.
6. Iwashyna TJ, Ely EW, Smith DM, Langa KM. Long-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis. JAMA 2010;304:17871794.
7. Dowdy DW, Eid MP, Dennison CR, Mendez-Tellez PA, Herridge MS, Guallar E, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Quality of life after acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med 2006;32:11151124.
8. Cuthbertson BH, Roughton S, Jenkinson D, Maclennan G, Vale L. Quality of life in the five years after intensive care: a cohort study. Crit Care 2010;14:R6.
9. Wunsch H, Angus DC. The puzzle of long-term morbidity after critical illness. Crit Care 2010;14:121.
10. Bienvenu OJ, Colantuoni E, Mendez-Tellez PA, Dinglas VD, Shanholtz C, Husain N, Dennison CR, Herridge MS, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Depression and impaired physical function after acute lung injury: a 2-year longitudinal study [abstract]. Presented at the Academy of Psychosomatic Medicine Annual Meeting. November 10–13, 2010, Marco Island, FL.
11. Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, Lamy M, Legall JR, Morris A, Spragg R. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149:818824.
12. Needham DM, Dennison CR, Dowdy DW, Mendez-Tellez PA, Ciesla N, Desai SV, Sevransky J, Shanholtz C, Scharfstein D, Herridge MS, et al.. Study protocol: The Improving Care of Acute lung injury Patients (ICAP) study. Crit Care 2006;10:R9.
13. Fan E, Shahid S, Kondreddi VP, Bienvenu OJ, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Informed consent in the critically ill: a two-step approach incorporating delirium screening. Crit Care Med 2008;36:9499.
14. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983;67:361370.
15. Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res 2002;52:6977.
16. Jacobson NS, Truax P. Clinical significance: a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1991;59:1219.
17. Crawford JR, Henry JD, Crombie HC, Taylor EP. Normative data for the HADS from a large non-clinical sample. Br J Clin Psychol 2001;40:429434.
18. Herrmann C. International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: a review of validation data and clinical results. J Psychosom Res 1997;42:1741.
19. Puhan MA, Frey M, Büchi S, Schünemann HJ. The minimal important difference of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008;6:46.
20. Lawton MP, Brody EM. Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. Gerontologist 1969;9:179186.
21. Coster WJ, Haley SM, Andres PL, Ludlow LH, Bond TLY, Ni PS. Refining the conceptual basis for rehabilitation outcome measurement: personal care and instrumental activities domain. Med Care 2004;42:I62I72.
22. Judge JO, Schechtman K, Cress E. The relationship between physical performance measures and independence in instrumental activities of daily living. The FICSIT group. Frailty and Injury: Cooperative Studies of Intervention Trials. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:13321341.
23. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992;30:473483.
24. Sager MA, Rudberg MA, Jalaluddin M, Franke T, Inouye SK, Landefeld CS, Siebens H, Winograd CH. Hospital Admission Risk Profile (HARP): identifying older patients at risk for functional decline following acute medical illness and hospitalization. J Am Geriatr Soc 1996;44:251257.
25. Sacanella E, Pérez-Castejón JM, Nicolás JM, Masanés F, Navarro M, Castro P, López-Soto A. Mortality in healthy elderly patients after ICU admission. Intensive Care Med 2009;35:550555.
26. de Meijer CA, Koopmanschap MA, Koolman XH, van Doorslaer EK. The role of disability in explaining long-term care utilization. Med Care 2009;47:11561163.
27. Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Marsh AP, Miller ME, Farmer DF. Measuring disability in older adults: The International Classification System of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) in older adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2008;8:4854.
28. Desai SD, Law TJ, Needham DM. Long-term complications of critical care. Crit Care Med 2011;39:371379.
29. Wilcox ME, Herridge MS. Long-term outcomes in patients surviving acute respiratory distress syndrome. Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2010;31:5565.
30. Dowdy DW, Dinglas V, Mendez-Tellez PA, Bienvenu OJ, Sevransky J, Dennison CR, Shanholtz C, Needham DM. Intensive care unit hypoglycemia predicts depression during early recovery from acute lung injury. Crit Care Med 2008;36:27262733.
31. Dowdy DW, Bienvenu OJ, Dinglas VD, Mendez-Tellez PA, Sevransky J, Shanholtz C, Needham DM. Are intensive care factors associated with depressive symptoms 6 months after acute lung injury? Crit Care Med 2009;37:17021707.
32. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:373383.
33. Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, Willatts S, De Mendonça A, Bruining H, Reinhart CK, Suter PM, Thijs LG. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707710.
34. Ely EW, Inouye SK, Bernard GR, Gordon S, Francis J, May L, Truman B, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, et al.. Delirium in mechanically ventilated patients: validity and reliability of the Confusion Assessment Method for the Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU). JAMA 2001;286:27032710.
35. Ely EW, Truman B, Shintani A, Thomason JW, Wheeler AP, Gordon S, Francis J, Speroff T, Gautam S, Margolin R, et al.. Monitoring sedation status over time in ICU patients: reliability and validity of the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS). JAMA 2003;289:29832991.
36. Singer JD, Willett JB. It's about time: using discrete-time survival analysis to study duration and the timing of events. J Educ Stat 1993;18:155195.
37. R Development Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2010.
38. Cheung AM, Tansey CM, Tomlinson G, Diaz-Granados N, Matté A, Barr A, Mehta S, Mazer CD, Guest CB, Stewart TE, et al.. Two-year outcomes, health care use, and costs of survivors of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006;174:538544.
39. Unroe M, Kahn JM, Carson SS, Govert JA, Martinu T, Sathy SJ, Clay AS, Chia J, Gray A, Tulsky JA, et al.. One-year trajectories of care and resource utilization for recipients of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:167175.
40. Tan T, Brett SJ, Stokes T. Rehabilitation after critical illness: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2009;338:b822.
41. Everson SA, Maty SC, Lynch JW, Kaplan GA. Epidemiologic evidence for the relation between socioeconomic status and depression, obesity, and diabetes. J Psychosom Res 2002;53:891895.
42. Peris A, Bonizzoli M, Iozzelli D, Migliaccio ML, Zagli G, Bacchereti A, Debolini M, Vannini E, Solaro M, Balzi I, et al.. Early intra-intensive care unit psychological intervention promotes recovery from post traumatic stress disorders, anxiety and depression symptoms in critically ill patients. Crit Care 2011;15:R41.
43. Roshanaei-Moghaddam B, Katon WJ, Russo J. The longitudinal effects of depression on physical activity. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2009;31:306315.
44. Katon W, Sullivan M, Walker E. Medical symptoms without identified pathology: relationship to psychiatric disorders, childhood and adult trauma, and personality traits. Ann Intern Med 2001;134:917925.
45. Katon WJ, Lin E, Russo J, Unutzer J. Increased medical costs of a population-based sample of depressed elderly patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2003;60:897903.
46. DiMatteo MR, Lepper HS, Croghan TW. Depression is a risk factor for noncompliance with medical treatment: meta-analysis of the effects of anxiety and depression on patient adherence. Arch Intern Med 2000;160:21012107.
47. Tsigos C, Chrousos GP. Hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, neuroendocrine factors and stress. J Psychosom Res 2002;53:865871.
48. Callahan CM, Kroenke K, Counsell SR, Hendrie HC, Perkins AJ, Katon W, Noel PH, Harpole L, Hunkeler EM, Unützer J. Treatment of depression improves physical functioning in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:367373.
49. Spitzer RL. Psychiatric diagnosis: are clinicians still necessary? Compr Psychiatry 1983;24:399411.
50. Oslin DW, Streim J, Katz IR, Edell WS, TenHave T. Change in disability follows inpatient treatment for late life depression. J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48:357362.
Correspondence and requests for reprints should be addressed to Oscar J. Bienvenu, M.D., Ph.D., 600 North Wolfe St., Meyer 115, Baltimore, MD 21287. E-mail:

Supported by National Institutes of Health Acute Lung Injury SCCOR Grant P050 HL73994. O.J.B. was supported by a Mentored Patient-Oriented Research Career Development Award (K23 MH64543). D.M.N. was supported by a Clinician-Scientist Award from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research. P.J.P. was supported by a Mid-career Investigator Award in Patient-Oriented Research (K24 HL88551). The funding bodies had no role in the study design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, writing, or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author Contributions: O.J.B., E.C., P.A.M.T., C.S., C.R.D., M.S.H., P.J.P., and D.M.N. contributed to the conception and design of this study. P.A.M.T., V.D.D., C.S., C.R.D., P.J.P., and D.M.N., contributed to the acquisition of data. O.J.B., E.C., P.A.M.T., V.D.D., N.H., M.S.H., P.J.P., and D.M.N. contributed to the analysis and interpretation of data. O.J.B. and E.C. drafted the manuscript, and all authors critically revised it for important intellectual content and approved the final version to be submitted.

Originally Published in Press as DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201103-0503OC on December 8, 2011

Author disclosures

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
185
5

Click to see any corrections or updates and to confirm this is the authentic version of record