Rationale: Moderate–severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness, and hypertension. It is not known whether minimally symptomatic OSA is also associated with impaired vascular function.
Objectives: To determine whether minimally symptomatic OSA is associated with impaired vascular function.
Methods: In 64 patients (7 females) with minimally symptomatic OSA (oxygen desaturation index, 23.1 [SD, 15.6]; Epworth Sleepiness Scale score, 8 [SD, 3.8]), and 15 matched control subjects without OSA, endothelial function was assessed by ultrasonographic measurement of flow-mediated dilatation, and by applanation tonometry–derived pulse wave analysis (forearm ischemia and salbutamol-induced changes in augmentation index, AIx). Arterial stiffness was assessed by AIx and ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) was measured over 1 week.
Measurements and Main Results: In patients with OSA, flow-mediated dilatation was significantly lower than in control subjects (5.0% [SD, 2.7%] and 7.5% [SD, 3.3%], respectively; P = 0.003). AIx was significantly higher in the OSA group compared with the control group (26.0% [interquartile range (IQR), 19.0–29.5%] and 21.0% [IQR, 8.0–27.0%], respectively; P = 0.04). Change in AIx after both forearm ischemia and salbutamol was significantly smaller in patients with OSA (−2.0% [IQR, −5.0 to +4.0%] and −3.0% [IQR, −7.0 to 0.0%], respectively), than in control subjects (−6.0% [IQR, −8.0 to −5.0%] and −7.0% [IQR, −10.0 to −3.0%]; P = 0.005 and P = 0.04, respectively). ABP was similar (97.6 mm Hg [SD, 7.9 mm Hg] and 94.8 mm Hg [SD, 7.4 mm Hg], OSA and control groups, respectively; P = 0.21).
Conclusions: In patients with minimally symptomatic OSA, diverse properties of endothelial function are impaired and arterial stiffness is increased. Although this was not associated with a significantly increased ABP, the findings suggest that patients with minimally symptomatic OSA are at increased cardiovascular risk.
Moderate–severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness. It is not known whether minimally symptomatic OSA has the same negative effect on vascular function.
In patients with minimally symptomatic OSA, diverse properties of endothelial function are impaired and arterial stiffness is increased. These findings suggest that patients with minimally symptomatic OSA are at increased cardiovascular risk.
Cross-sectional and prospective studies have implicated OSA as an important causal factor in the development of cardiovascular disease (2). The mechanisms underlying the association between OSA and cardiovascular disease are currently not fully understood, and indeed may not be causal. Multiple causal factors leading to vessel wall damage and atherosclerotic plaques have been proposed, including reflex sympathetic activation, consequent increases in blood pressure, endothelial dysfunction, systemic inflammation, and reactive oxygen species (3–5).
Endothelial dysfunction and increased arterial stiffness play a central role in the initiation of atherosclerosis and are associated with cardiovascular risk factors (6–9). As a result, there is growing interest in early detection of these measures of cardiovascular risk with the anticipation that an intervention will benefit patients who are at increased risk for future cardiovascular events.
Moderate to severe OSA has been associated with endothelial dysfunction, increased arterial stiffness, and hypertension, all of which have been shown to improve after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy (5, 10, 11). In contrast to the fall in blood pressure seen with CPAP in hypersomnolent patients with OSA, blood pressure did not decrease after therapy in nonsleepy hypertensive patients with OSA (12). However, there are no data on endothelial dysfunction and arterial stiffness, potentially reflecting earlier changes in vascular function in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA. More importantly, because of the absence of daytime symptoms, these patients might not be treated with CPAP.
To investigate the hypothesis that vascular function is impaired in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA, we performed a controlled cross-sectional study investigating different aspects of endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and ambulatory blood pressure in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA.
Some of the results of this study have been previously reported in the form of an abstract (13).
Patients with possible obstructive sleep apnea were referred to the Oxford Sleep Unit, Oxford Centre for Respiratory Medicine (Oxford, UK), by general practitioners; ear, nose, and throat surgeons; or other hospital consultants, usually because of severe snoring or witnessed apneas. Patients were eligible for the study if they were between 45 and 75 years of age, had proven obstructive sleep apnea with a severity defined as more than 7.5 oxygen desaturations exceeding 4% per hour (oxygen desaturation index [ODI] > 7.5/h), and no history of excessive daytime sleepiness or any other daytime symptoms of OSA that would have justified CPAP therapy. All eligible patients were offered participation in the study.
Control subjects were mainly identified and recruited from a general practitioners' database and were eligible for the study if they were between 45 and 75 years of age with no history of OSA, had fewer than five oxygen desaturations exceeding 4% per hour (ODI < 5/h), and an apnea/hypopnea index less than 5 per hour (AHI < 5/h). Control subjects were matched to patients with OSA for sex, age, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and cardiovascular comorbidities. The study was approved by the Oxford Research Ethics Committee (record no. 05/Q1604/159), and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
In patients, OSA was diagnosed from a one-night in-hospital respiratory polygraphic sleep study. Patients' body movements, heart rate, and pulse transit time changes were recorded as measures of arousal from sleep. Pulse oximetry, snoring, and increases in the respiratory swing in pulse transit time were used as markers of breathing pattern and respiratory effort (Win-Visi monitoring system; Stowood Scientific Instruments, Oxford, UK) as previously described and validated (14, 15).
The results of the sleep study were scored automatically, with manual review to ensure accuracy of the data. OSA was diagnosed from review of all data, and the severity was quantified as the number of oxygen desaturations exceeding 4% per hour of study (ODI). In control subjects, OSA was excluded by home sleep studies using the ApneaLink device (ResMed; MAP Medicine Technology, Martinsried, Germany). The device records the patient's nasal respiratory pressure signal and finger oximetry during sleep; it has been validated as an accurate instrument with which to detect snoring, apnea/hypopnea, and oxygen desaturations (16). The results of the sleep study were scored automatically with dedicated software (ResMed; MAP Medicine Technology), with manual review to ensure accuracy of the data. Apneas were defined as a cessation of airflow lasting more than 10 seconds, and hypopneas as a reduction in airflow of at least 50% lasting more than 10 seconds, associated with a drop in oxygen saturation exceeding 4%.
Subjective sleepiness was assessed with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, which assesses the tendency to fall asleep during eight typical daytime situations (17). Objective sleepiness was measured with one sleep resistance challenge (Oxford Sleep Resistance [OSLER] test), which tests the ability to stay awake in a darkened and sound-isolated room (18).
A cardiovascular risk score (Framingham index) was used to objectively assess an individual's 5-year risk of death due to cardiovascular events (19). The risk score is based on 11 factors including age, sex, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol concentration, height, serum creatinine concentration, cigarette smoking, diabetes, left ventricular hypertrophy, and history of stroke and myocardial infarction. The risk score is an integer, with points added for each factor according to its association with risk. The sum score and the corresponding risk of a fatal cardiovascular event were derived from individual patient data according to Pocock and coworkers (19).
Patients were asked to abstain from alcohol, tobacco, or caffeine on the day measurements were taken. Room temperature and lighting were set at the same level for all measurements. Flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) measurements were performed by ultrasound scanning according to the method originally described by Celermajer and coworkers (8). Longitudinal images of the brachial artery were obtained with a high-frequency (10.0-MHz) ultrasound scanning probe (Acuson CV70; Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc., Camberley, Surrey, UK) proximal to the antecubital fossa. Two-dimensional images, acquired with electrocardiogram gating, were obtained at baseline with Doppler ultrasound imaging to assess arterial diameter and flow velocity. Reactive hyperemia was then induced by inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet around the forearm to 200 mm Hg for 5 minutes, and repeated arterial diameter and flow velocity measurements were made at maximal dilatation 60 seconds after cuff deflation. To assess endothelial-independent vasodilation, we measured maximal brachial artery diameter 3 minutes after a single sublingual dose of nitroglycerin (NTG, 0.5 mg). All measurements were stored digitally and analyzed offline. Brachial artery diameter was measured automatically at the onset of the R wave with dedicated software (Vascular Research Tools 5; Medical Imaging Applications LLC, Coralville, IA) as previously described and validated (20, 21). The mean values of at least three cardiac cycles were averaged for each time point and results of endothelial-dependent (FMD) and endothelial-independent (NTG) vasodilation were expressed as percent change in arterial diameter from the baseline diameter.
Radial artery pulse waveforms were recorded with a pressure tonometer and designated software as previously described (SphygmoCor; At-Cor Medical, Sydney, Australia) (www.atcormedical.com) (22). Briefly, mean values of approximately 10 radial pulse waves are used to generate a corresponding central aortic pressure waveform with a validated mathematical transfer function (23). The software uses an algorithm to determine the inflection point of the aortic pressure waveform, which corresponds to the onset of the reflected wave returning from peripheral arteries, and divides the aortic pressure wave into an early and late systolic peak. The augmentation index (AIx) quantifies augmentation of central aortic pressure (due to the reflected component of the pulse pressure waveform), which typically increases with age as the arteries become stiffer (or less compliant) (24). AIx is calculated as the difference between the second (P2) and first systolic peak pressure (P1), expressed as percentage of the central pulse pressure (PP): AIx (%) = [(P2 – P1)/PP] × 100. As heart rate influences AIx, all values of AIx were corrected to 75 beats/minute as previously described (25). In essence, the faster the pulse wave returns from the periphery, the stiffer the arteries must be, and the higher the calculated augmentation index.
First, a baseline measurement of AIx was performed as a measure of arterial stiffness. To assess an endothelium-dependent change of AIx, reactive hyperemia was induced by inflation of a pneumatic tourniquet around the forearm to 200 mm Hg for 5 minutes and a repeated measurement of AIx was performed between 120 and 180 seconds after cuff deflation. A sublingual dose of 0.5 mg of NTG was then administered for 3 minutes to assess endothelium-independent vascular reaction, followed by a repeated measurement of AIx after 4 minutes. Previous studies have shown that 20 minutes is sufficient for hemodynamic changes after NTG to return to baseline (26). Therefore, after a 30-minute break, 400 μg of salbutamol was administered by inhalation as an alternative method to induce endothelium-dependent vascular dilatation (26), and AIx was remeasured after 10 minutes; at this time the peak plasma concentration of salbutamol occurs (26).
A minimum of 10 radial artery pulse waveforms is required by the software to calculate the AIx and also to derive an operator index (indicating the quality and reproducibility of the arterial signal) (SphygmoCor; At-Cor Medical). Several estimates of AIx were performed on each occasion and the measurement with the highest operator index was used for statistical analysis.
All patients had office blood pressure measured in the sitting position, after a period of rest for 5 minutes, with a standard digital automatic monitor (Omron Healthcare Co., Kyoto, Japan). The mean value of three readings was used for analysis.
Participants were asked to measure their ambulatory blood pressure at home three times per day in triplicate on seven continuous days with a standard digital automatic monitor (Omron Healthcare Co.) in the sitting position after a period of rest for 5 minutes.
The mean value of the 7 days of readings was used for analysis.
Data are expressed as means (SD) if data were normally distributed and as medians (interquartile range) if data were not normally distributed. All statistical analyses were performed with Statistica version 6.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). Differences between the OSA and control groups in terms of patients characteristics, blood pressure, endothelial function, and arterial stiffness were compared by independent t tests if data were normally distributed, or by the Mann-Whitney U test if data were not normally distributed. For comparison of frequencies, the χ2 test of independence was used. Spearman's rank test was used for correlation analysis. A P value less than 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.
Sixty-four patients with minimally symptomatic OSA and 15 control subjects without OSA were recruited. Control subjects were well matched for age, sex, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and cardiovascular risk profile. As expected, patients with OSA had a higher ODI, a greater neck circumference, and tended to have a higher score on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale although objective sleepiness assessed by the OSLER test was similar in the two groups (Table 1).
Patients with OSA (n = 64) | Control Subjects without OSA (n = 15) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Age, yr | 57.9 (6.8) | 58.1 (6.9) | 0.91 |
BMI, kg/m2 | 32.9 (6.2) | 31.7 (2.6) | 0.74 |
Waist-to-hip circumference ratio | 0.97 (0.06) | 0.97 (0.06) | 0.39 |
Neck circumference, cm | 43.7 (4.2) | 40.8 (3.0) | 0.01 |
Females, % | 10.9 | 13.3 | 0.79 |
Current smokers, % | 12.5 | 13.3 | 0.93 |
Ex-smokers,* % | 40.6 | 33.3 | 0.66 |
Hypertension,* % | 40.6 | 46.7 | 0.67 |
Diabetes,* % | 15.6 | 6.7 | 0.37 |
CAD,* % | 9.4 | 13.3 | 0.65 |
Cardiovascular risk score,† % | 2.5 (3.8) | 3.0 (4.6) | 0.68 |
Total cholesterol, mmol/L | 5.4 (1.2) | 5.2 (1.2) | 0.68 |
Fasting glucose, mmol/L | 5.9 (1.2) | 6.0 (0.8) | 0.80 |
Antihypertensive medication, % | 40.6 | 40.0 | 0.97 |
Cholesterol-lowering medication, % | 32.8 | 40.0 | 0.60 |
Glucose-lowering medication, % | 14.1 | 6.7 | 0.44 |
Oxygen saturation dips >4% (per h of sleep) | 23.1 (15.6) | 2.9 (1.1) | <0.0001 |
Minimal nocturnal oxygen saturation, % | 78.5 (8.0) | 90.0 (2.1) | <0.0001 |
ESS | 8.5 (3.8) | 6.5 (3.4) | 0.06 |
OSLER test, min | 32.6 (10.8) | 35.2 (10.2) | 0.41 |
Mean office blood pressure, and blood pressures averaged from the 7-day period of ambulatory measurements, were similar in patients with OSA and in control subjects (Table 2). Systolic office blood pressure, and averaged 7-day systolic blood pressure, tended to be higher in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA than in control subjects (Table 2).
Patients with OSA (n = 64) | Control Subjects without OSA (n = 15) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
Office systolic BP | 140.4 (18.0) | 131.7 (17.5) | 0.09 |
Office diastolic BP | 84.3 (9.0) | 81.3 (8.2) | 0.23 |
Office mean BP | 102.0 (11.2) | 98.1 (10.2) | 0.12 |
7-d systolic BP | 130.6 (10.1) | 125.2 (13.2) | 0.08 |
7-d diastolic BP | 81.1 (7.9) | 79.6 (5.8) | 0.49 |
7-d mean BP | 97.6 (7.9) | 94.8 (7.4) | 0.21 |
AIx baseline* (%) | 26.0 (19.0 to 29.5) | 21.0 (8.0 to 27.0) | 0.04 |
Mean baseline brachial artery diameter was 4.7 (0.8) mm in patients with OSA and 4.3 (0.6) mm in the control group (mean difference, +0.4 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], −0.04 to +0.84 mm; P = 0.13). Endothelial function, as assessed by measurement of flow-mediated dilatation of the brachial artery, was impaired in patients with OSA (mean FMD, 5.0 [2.7]%) compared with control subjects (mean FMD, 7.5 [3.3]%) (mean difference, 2.5%; 95% CI, −4.1 to −0.9%; P = 0.003) (Figure 1). As would be expected, mean NTG-induced endothelium-independent vasodilation was not different between patients with OSA and control subjects: 14.1 (5.0)% and 15.7 (6.1)%, respectively (mean difference, −1.6%; 95% CI, −4.6 to 1.4%; P = 0.28). Flow-mediated dilatation was correlated with the cardiovascular risk score (r = −0.36; n = 79; 95% CI, −0.54 to −0.15; P = 0.001), but there was no significant correlation between FMD and ODI.
Pulse wave analysis could be performed in 60 patients with OSA (measurements were not possible in 4 patients with atrial fibrillation) and 15 control subjects. Arterial stiffness, assessed by AIx, was higher in patients with OSA compared with matched control subjects (Table 2). The endothelial-dependent changes in AIx after ischemia-induced hyperemia and application of salbutamol were greater in control subjects than in patients with OSA (Table 3). As expected, the endothelial-independent response to NTG was not different between the two groups (Table 3). AIx at baseline was correlated with ODI (r = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.50; P = 0.01).
Patients with OSA (n = 60) | Control Subjects without OSA (n = 15) | P Value | |
---|---|---|---|
ΔAIx after ischemia, % | −2.0 (−5.0 to +4.0) | −6.0 (−8.0 to −5.0) | 0.005 |
ΔAIx after NTG, % | −15.0 (−21.0 to −10.0) | −17.0 (−22.0 to −10.0) | 0.97 |
ΔAIx after salbutamol, % | −3.0 (−7.0 to 0.0) | −7.0 (−10.0 to −3.0) | 0.04 |
To our knowledge, this is the first well-controlled, cross-sectional study on endothelial function, arterial stiffness, and blood pressure in patients with minimally symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea. We found that patients with minimally symptomatic obstructive sleep apnea had impaired endothelial function, assessed by flow-mediated dilatation and pulse wave analysis measurements, and increased arterial stiffness, compared with matched control subjects without obstructive sleep apnea. However, both office and averaged 7-day mean ambulatory blood pressure were similar in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA and control subjects.
We found that endothelial function assessed by two different techniques was impaired in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA compared with well-matched control subjects without OSA. The average flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was 5% in the OSA group, which is lower than the reported FMD in a healthy control population (8). Moreover, the observed difference in FMD between the patients with OSA and matched control subjects was 2.5% (see Figure 1) in our study; the size of this difference has been shown to be of clinical significance in studies looking at the association between flow-mediated dilatation and subsequent cardiovascular events (27, 28). In agreement with our study, Ip and coworkers (5) found that FMD was similarly impaired (FMD was 5.3%) in 28 patients with moderate–severe OSA without comorbidities, as was the observed difference in FMD (3%) between subjects with and without OSA. One of the potential underlying mechanisms for endothelial dysfunction in patients with OSA seems to be a downregulation of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase as a result of increased oxidative stress (29), excessive arterial wall shear stress caused by recurrent surges in blood pressure during apneic events (3), as well as increased endothelial cell apoptosis (30), and increased levels of coagulation factors and cholesterol (31).
The augmentation index, a measure of central arterial stiffness and pressure wave reflection, independently predicts cardiovascular events in high-risk populations (32). In our study, the augmentation index was significantly higher in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA compared with matched control subjects. The observed difference is comparable in size to the effect seen after 4 weeks of CPAP therapy in patients with moderate–severe OSA (11). The mechanism responsible for the increase in arterial stiffness is speculative at present. A higher sympathetic activity, due to recurrent sleep fragmentation or intermittent hypoxia, may contribute to the observed increase in arterial stiffness (11). Alternatively, the augmentation index has been shown to increase with the plasma level of asymmetric dimethylarginine (an endogenous inhibitor of endothelial NO synthase), suggesting that impaired endothelial function secondary to a lower bioavailability of NO may be a further cause for increased arterial stiffness in patients with OSA (5).
Consistent with an impaired FMD, we found that endothelial function assessed by pulse wave analysis (change in augmentation index [AIx] induced by both salbutamol and reactive hyperemia) was worse in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA than in matched control subjects. In contrast to FMD measurements, the augmentation index reflects the vascular function of a composite of the whole arterial tree (33), and therefore the decreased endothelial-dependent change in AIx we found in OSA reflects impaired endothelial function of differently sized arteries compared with FMD. To our knowledge, there are no other published studies that have investigated endothelial function in OSA by the same technique.
In contrast to the observed differences in endothelial function and arterial stiffness (measures representing early and sensitive changes in vascular function), we found no statistically significant difference in either office blood pressure or ambulatory blood pressure (measured during a period of 1 wk) between patients with minimally symptomatic OSA and matched control subjects; although there was a trend toward higher systolic blood pressure in patients with OSA (Table 2). This negative finding is supported by our previous work, in which we found that CPAP did not reduce blood pressure in nonsleepy hypertensive patients with moderate–severe OSA (12). However, the current study was not powered to look at blood pressure differences as a primary outcome, and therefore studies including a larger number of patients with minimally symptomatic OSA are needed to clarify this point.
It must be mentioned that although our control group was meticulously matched, neck circumference was greater in patients with OSA although waist-to-hip circumference was not; this might suggest that subtle differences in fat distribution could be a possible confounder as it has been shown that neck circumference may be a better measure of upper body obesity in some circumstances and is strongly correlated with cardiovascular risk (34).
In conclusion, this controlled cross-sectional study has shown that in patients with minimally symptomatic OSA, diverse properties of endothelial function are impaired, and arterial stiffness is increased, when compared with well-matched control subjects without OSA. Although this was not associated with significantly increased blood pressure, the findings of this study suggest that patients with minimally symptomatic OSA are at increased cardiovascular risk, as has been demonstrated in more severe disease. However, final proof that this association is causal, and not due to confounders, must await a randomized and controlled intervention study.
1. | Young T, Peppard PE, Gottlieb DJ. Epidemiology of obstructive sleep apnea: a population health perspective. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;165:1217–1239. |
2. | Peker Y, Hedner J, Norum J, Kraiczi H, Carlson J. Increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in middle-aged men with obstructive sleep apnea: a 7-year follow-up. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002;166:159–165. |
3. | Somers VK, Kyken ME, Clary MP, Abbound FM. Sympathetic neural mechanisms in obstructive sleep apnea. J Clin Invest 1995;96:1897–1904. |
4. | Shamsuzzaman AS, Winnicki M, Lanfranchi P, Wolk R, Kara T, Accurso V, Somers VK. Elevated C-reactive protein in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Circulation 2002;105:2462–2464. |
5. | Ip MSM, Tse HF, Lam B, Tsang KWT, Lam WK. Endothelial function in obstructive sleep apnea and response to treatment. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;169:348–353. |
6. | Ross R. Atherosclerosis: an inflammatory disease. N Engl J Med 1999;340:115–126. |
7. | Shimokawa H. Primary endothelial dysfunction: atherosclerosis. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1999;31:23–27. |
8. | Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, Spiegelhalter DJ, Miller OI, Sullivan ID, Lloyd JK, Deanfield JE. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet 1992;340:1111–1115. |
9. | Schachinger V, Britten MB, Zeiher AM. Prognostic impact of coronary vasodilator dysfunction on adverse long-term outcome of coronary heart disease. Circulation 2000;101:1899–1906. |
10. | Pepperell JCT, Ramdassingh-Dow S, Crosthwaite N, Mullins R, Jenkinson C, Stradling JR, Davies RJO. Ambulatory blood pressure after therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised parallel trial. Lancet 2002;359:204–210. |
11. | Kohler M, Pepperell JCT, Casadei B, Craig S, Crosthwaite N, Stradling JR, Davies RJO. Effects of continuous positive airway pressure on arterial stiffness, sympathetic activity, and baroreflex sensitivity in obstructive sleep apnea: a randomized controlled trial [abstract]. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:A292. |
12. | Robinson GV, Smith DM, Langford BA, Davies RJ, Stradling JR. Continuous positive airway pressure does not reduce blood pressure in nonsleepy hypertensive OSA patients. Eur Respir J 2006;27:1229–1235. |
13. | Kohler M, Craig S, Nicoll D, Leeson P, Stradling J. Vascular reactivity in patients with mild-moderate obstructive sleep apnoea [abstract]. Eur Respir J 2007;30:333s. |
14. | Pitson DJ, Stradling JR. Autonomic markers of arousal during sleep in patients undergoing investigation for obstructive sleep apnoea, their relationship to EEG arousals, respiratory events and subjective sleepiness. J Sleep Res 1998;7:53–60. |
15. | Argod J, Pepin JL, Levy P. Differentiating obstructive and central sleep respiratory events through pulse transit time. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998;158:1778–1783. |
16. | Wang Y, Teschler T, Weinreich G, Hess S, Wessendorf TE, Teschler H. Validation of microMESAM as screening device for sleep disordered breathing. Pneumologie 2003;57:734–740. |
17. | Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. Sleep 1991;14:540–545. |
18. | Bennett LS, Stradling JR, Davies RJ. A behavioural test to assess daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnoea. J Sleep Res 1997;6:142–145. |
19. | Pocock SJ, McCormack V, Gueyffier F, Boutitie F, Fagard RH, Boissel JP. A score for predicting risk of death from cardiovascular disease in adults with raised blood pressure, based on individual patient data from randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2001;323:75–81. |
20. | Tounian P, Aggoun Y, Dubern B, Varille V, Guy-Grand B, Sidi D, Girardet JP, Bonnet D. Presence of increased stiffness of the common carotid artery and endothelial dysfunction in severely obese children: a prospective study. Lancet 2001;358:1400–1404. |
21. | Sonka M, Liang W, Lauer RM. Automated analysis of brachial ultrasound image sequences: early detection of cardiovascular disease via surrogates of endothelial function. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002;21:1271–1279. |
22. | Kelly RP, Hayward CS, Avolio AP, O'Rourke M. Noninvasive determination of age-related changes in the human arterial pulse. Circulation 1989;80:1652–1659. |
23. | Pauca AL, O'Rourke MF, Kon ND. Prospective evaluation of a method for estimating ascending aortic pressure from the radial artery pressure waveform. Hypertension 2001;38:932–937. |
24. | Safar ME, London GM. Therapeutic studies and arterial stiffness in hypertension: recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension. The clinical committee of arterial structure and function. Working group on vascular structure and function of the European Society of Hypertension. J Hypertens 2000;18:1527–1535. |
25. | Wilkinson IB, Mohammad NH, Tyrell S, Hall IR, Webb DJ, Paul VE, Levy T, Cockcroft JR. Heart rate dependency of pulse pressure amplification and arterial stiffness. Am J Hypertens 2002;15:24–30. |
26. | Wilkinson IB, Hall IR, MacCallum H, Mackenzie IS, McEniery CM, van der Arend BJ, Shu YE, MacKay LS, Webb DJ, Cockcroft JR. Pulse-wave analysis: clinical evaluation of a noninvasive, widely apllicable method for assessing endothelial function. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2002;22:147–152. |
27. | Gokce N, Keany JF Jr, Hunter LM, Watkins MT, Menzoian MO, Vita JA. Risk stratification for postoperative cardiovascular events via noninvasive assessment of endothelial function: a prospective study. Circulation 2002;105:1567–1572. |
28. | Brevetti G, Silvestro A, Schiano V, Chiariello M. Endothelial dysfunction and cardiovascular risk prediction in peripheral arterial disease: additive value of flow-mediated dilation to ankle–brachial pressure index. Circulation 2003;108:2093–2098. |
29. | Gozal D, Kheirandish-Gozal L. Cardiovascular morbidity in obstructive sleep apnea: oxidative stress, inflammation, and much more. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008;177:369–375. |
30. | El Solh AA, Akinnusi ME, Baddoura FH, Mankowski CR. Endothelial cell apoptosis in obstructive sleep apnea: a link to endothelial dysfunction. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;175:1186–1191. |
31. | Robinson GV, Pepperell JC, Segal HC, Davies RJ, Stradling JR. Circulating cardiovascular risk factors in obstructive sleep apnoea: data from randomised controlled trials. Thorax 2004;59:777–782. |
32. | Weber T, Auer J, O'Rourke MF, Kvas E, Lassnig E, Berent R, Eber B. Arterial stiffness, wave reflections, and the risk of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2004;109:184–189. |
33. | O'Rourke MF, Gallagher DE. Pulse wave analysis. J Hypertens 1996;14:147–157. |
34. | Liubov BN, Arie L. Relationship of neck circumference to cardiovascular risk factors. Obes Res 2003;11:226–231. |